| Literature DB >> 30065895 |
Miquel A Gonzalez-Meler1, Armen Poghosyan1,2, Yaniria Sanchez-de Leon1,3, Eduardo Dias de Olivera1, Richard J Norby4, Neil C Sturchio1,5.
Abstract
Most experimental studies measuring the effects of climate change on terrestriEntities:
Keywords: Bioturbation; Elevated CO2; Isotope; Soil C; Temperate forest; cesium-137; lead-210
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065895 PMCID: PMC6065474 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Soil organic carbon vs depth.
(A) depth (cm) vs. soil organic carbon (wt. %) for average core samples from ambient (open circles) and elevated-CO2 plots (filled circles); (B) depth (cm) vs. δ13C (‰) for average core samples from ambient (open circles) and elevated-CO2 plots (filled circles).
Figure 2δ13C vs. inverse concentration of organic carbon.
Diagram showing δ13C (‰) vs. inverse concentration of organic carbon (1/wt. %) for averages of core profiles from the ambient CO2 plot (open circles) and the elevated-CO2 plot (filled circles). Black lines are 2nd-order polynomial best fits. Shift of the elevated-CO2 profile toward the Y-axis indicates enrichment in organic carbon relative to the ambient CO2 profile. Y-intercepts represent contrasting δ13C values of organic carbon being added to the surface under ambient and elevated-CO2 conditions.
Soil bulk density (kg cm−3) across the soil profile for sections of soil cores collected at ambient and Elevated CO2 plots at the ORNL FACE experiment in 2008.
Values are averages of three and two replicates for ambient and elevated plots, respectively, with standard errors.
| 0–1 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.07 |
| 1–2 | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
| 2–3 | 0.97 ± 0.21 | 1.08 ± 0.31 |
| 3–4 | 0.96 ± 0.32 | 1.23 ± 0.25 |
| 4–5 | 1.16 ± 0.09 | 1.02 ± 0.01 |
| 5–6 | 1.27 ± 0.06 | 1.43 ± 0.13 |
| 6–7 | 1.43 ± 0.20 | 1.00 ± 0.19 |
| 7–8 | 1.26 ± 0.11 | 1.26 ± 0.22 |
| 8–10 | 1.16 ± 0.09 | 1.43 ± 0.16 |
| 10–12 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 1.11 ± 0.09 |
| 12–14 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.20 |
| 14–16 | 1.36 ± 0.05 | 1.23 ± 0.12 |
| 16–18 | 1.28 ± 0.16 | 1.17 ± 0.04 |
| 18–20 | 1.28 ± 0.06 | 1.18 ± 0.12 |
| 20–25 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 1.36 ± 0.08 |
| 25–30 | 1.16 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.05 |
Figure 3Depth vs. 137Cs activity.
Depth (cm) vs. average 137Cs activity (Bq cm−3) in cores collected from the ambient (open circles) and elevated-CO2 (filled circles) plots at the Oak Ridge FACE site. Solid lines (gray, ambient; R2 = 0.84; black, elevated-CO2; R2 = 0.75) are best-fit advection-diffusion model profiles based on Eq. (2).
Figure 4Cumulative 137Cs activity.
Average cumulative 137Cs activity (Bq/cm2) vs. depth (cm) in soil cores from ambient and elevated-CO2 plots collected in 2008 (after 10 years of CO2 release) and for two single sets of samples collected from the same locations in 1997 (before the beginning of CO2 release) at the Oak Ridge FACE site.
Bioturbation.
Parameter values obtained from advection-diffusion model. Parameters D, v, and γ are derived from best-fits of average 137Cs activity profiles to Eq. (2). The soil mixing time τ is calculated for L = 20 cm. Values are averages of two ambient CO2 and two elevated CO2 rings ± standard deviations.
| Bio-diffusion coefficient | cm2 yr−1 | 0.53 ± 0.20 | 0.63 ± 0.29 | |
| Advection term | cm yr−1 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | |
| Feeding rate constant | yr−1 | 0.008 ± 0.003 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | |
| Soil mixing time ( | yr | 750 ± 210 | 640 ± 200 |
Figure 5Activity ratio (210Pb/226Ra) vs. depth (cm) in soil cores collected in 2008 from ambient (open circles) and elevated-CO2 (filled circles) plots at the Oak Ridge FACE site.
Solid curve (blue) represents constant addition of 210Pb to the surface, an advection rate of 0.185 cm yr−1 based on best-fit of advection-diffusion model (Eq. (3)) to mean 137CS profiles, and decay of 210Pb to a steady-state value of 0.75 × (226Ra), representing 25% loss of in situ 222Rn production. Dot-dashed vertical line represents the typical mean value of 0.75 for soil (210Pb/226Ra) (Graustein & Turekian, 1990). Dashed curve (red) represents constant addition of 210Pb to the surface and an advection rate of 0.0.093 cm yr−1 based on the best-fit of advection-diffusion model (Eq. (4)) to mean unsupported-210Pb profiles, and decay of 210Pb to a steady-state value of 0.75 × (226Ra). Apparent deficiency of excess 210Pb in the soil profiles is consistent with diffusive escape of 222Rn produced in situ, possibly enhanced by bioturbation and transpiration occurring in the shallow root zone.
Figure 6(A) Depth (cm) vs. 40K activity (Bq cm−1) and (B) depth (cm) vs. 226Ra activity (Bq cm−1) in average soil profiles from the ambient (open circles) and elevated-CO2 (filled circles) plots at the Oak Ridge FACE site.