| Literature DB >> 23717164 |
Jae Sik Ryu1, Hyun Jung Lee, Song Hwan Bae, Sun Young Kim, Yooheon Park, Hyung Joo Suh, Yoon Hwa Jeong.
Abstract
For the improvement of ginsenoside bioavailability, the ginsenosides of fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus (FRG) were examined with respect to bioavailability and physiological activity. The polyphenol content of FRG (19.14±0.50 mg/g) was significantly higher (p<0.05) compared with that of non-fermented red ginseng (NFRG, 11.31±1.15 mg/g). The antioxidant activities in FRG, such as 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid, and ferric reducing antioxidant power, were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those in NFRG. The HPLC analysis results showed that the FRG had a high level of ginsenoside metabolites. The total ginsenoside contents in NFRG and FRG were 41.65±1.53 mg/g and 50.12±1.43 mg/g, respectively. However, FRG had a significantly higher content (33.90±0.97 mg/g) of ginsenoside metabolites (Rg3, Rg5, Rk1, compound K, Rh1, F2, and Rg2) compared with NFRG (14.75±0.46 mg/g). The skin permeability of FRG was higher than that of NFRG using Franz diffusion cell models. In particular, after 3 h, the skin permeability of FRG was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of NFRG. Using a rat everted intestinal sac model, FRG showed a high transport level compared with NFRG after 1 h. FRG had dramatically improved bioavailability compared with NFRG as indicated by skin permeation and intestinal permeability. The significantly greater bioavailability of FRG may have been due to the transformation of its ginsenosides by fermentation to more easily absorbable forms (ginsenoside metabolites).Entities:
Keywords: Bioavailability; Fermented red ginseng; Panax ginseng
Year: 2013 PMID: 23717164 PMCID: PMC3659629 DOI: 10.5142/jgr.2013.37.108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ginseng Res ISSN: 1226-8453 Impact factor: 6.060
Fig. 1.A chromatogram of standard ginsenosides using HPLC assay. The column configuration consisted of an IMtakt Cadenza CD-C18 (4.6×75 mm). The UV absorption was measured at 203 nm. Gradient elution was employed, using solvent A (10% acetonitrile) and solvent B (90% acetonitrile) at 40℃. CK, compound K.
General composition and antioxidant activities of NFRG and FRG
| NFRG | FRG | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Dry weight (mg/mL) | 927.00±23.30 | 827.33±25.421) |
| Total sugar (mg/g) | 436.71±10.17 | 432.76±14.69 |
| Uronic acid (mg/g) | 71.38±2.74 | 45.44±1.301) |
| Polyphenol (mg/g) | 11.31±1.15 | 19.14±0.501) |
| DPPH (IC50, mg/mL) | 3.58±0.07 | 1.57±0.061) |
| ABTS (IC50, mg/mL) | 5.21±0.08 | 2.61±0.121) |
| FRAP (mM TPTZ/g) | 44.21±0.84 | 83.52±5.041) |
NFRG, non-fermented red ginseng; FRG, fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus; DPPH, 2,2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; TPTZ, 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine.
1)The FRG shows a significant difference compared with the NFRG (p<0.05).
Ginsenosides content of NFRG and FRG
| Ginsenoside | NFRG (mg/g) | FRG (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Rg1 | 1.50±0.06 | 0.35±0.021) |
| Re | 3.86±0.15 | 0.61±0.021) |
| Rf | 1.53±0.06 | 1.46±0.05 |
| Rh1(s)+Rg2(s) | 0.98±0.02 | 1.44±0.041) |
| Rg2(r) | 1.31±0.05 | 2.24±0.071) |
| Rb1 | 8.75±0.44 | 1.98±0.061) |
| Rc | 4.33±0.13 | 1.77±0.061) |
| Rb2 | 4.09±0.12 | 2.70±0.081) |
| Rd | 2.83±0.10 | 7.34±0.211) |
| F2 | 1.48±0.05 | 4.00±0.111) |
| Rg3(s) | 2.69±0.08 | 6.21±0.181) |
| Rg3(r) | 1.74±0.06 | 3.62±0.111) |
| CK+Rg5 | 1.72±0.06 | 3.92±0.111) |
| Rk1 | 4.82±0.14 | 12.20±0.361) |
| Rh2(s) | ND | 0.28±0.01 |
| Rh2(r) | ND | ND |
| Total | 41.65±1.53 | 50.12±1.431) |
| Rg1+Rb1 | 10.25±0.51 | 2.33±0.071) |
| Panaxdiols | 24.43±0.94 | 23.62±0.67 |
| Panaxtriols | 9.19±0.36 | 6.11±0.171) |
| Metabolite2) | 14.75±0.46 | 33.90±0.971) |
NFRG, non-fermented red ginseng; FRG, fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus; CK, compound K; ND, not detected, 1)The FRG shows a significant difference compared with the NFRG (p<0.05).
2)Sum of Rg2, Rg3, Rg5, Rk1, CK, Rh1, Rh2, and F2.
Fig. 2.A chromatogram of (A) non-fermented red ginseng and (B) fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus ginsenosides using HPLC assay. The column configuration consisted of an IMtakt Cadenza CD-C18 (4.6×75 mm). The UV absorption was measured at 203 nm. Gradient elution was employed, using solvent A (10% acetonitrile) and solvent B (90% acetonitrile) at 40℃.
Fig. 3.The skin permeability test using the Franz diffusion cell model of non-fermented red ginseng (NFRG) and fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus (FRG). A 100 μL sample of ginseng was placed on the donor side of a Franz cell. The receptor medium was kept at 37℃ and stirred with a magnetic stirrer at 400 rpm. Aliquots (0.5 mL) of the receptor medium were withdrawn at 0.5 h, 1 to 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h. The skin permeability of the ginseng sample is expressed as mg of polyphenol/g tissue dry weight. The FRG shows a significant difference compared with the NFRG (**p<0.01, ***p<0.001).
Fig. 4.The intestinal permeability test using the everted intestinal sac model of non-fermented red ginseng (NFRG) and fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus (FRG). After an everted sac was filled with 1 mL of Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer (inner compartment), the sacs were incubated in 29.5 mL of the same buffer (outer compartment) that contained 0.5 mL of ginseng sample at 37℃ in a water bath. The serosal fluid inside the sacs was sampled at 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, and 1 h. The intestinal transport of the ginseng sample is expressed as mg of polyphenols/g tissue dry weight. The FRG shows a significant difference compared with the NFRG (**p<0.01, ***p<0.001).
Fig. 5.The ginsenoside intestinal permeability test using the everted intestinal sac model of non-fermented red ginseng (NFRG) and fermented red ginseng by Phellinus linteus (FRG). After an everted sac was filled with 1 mL of Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer (inner compartment), the sacs were incubated in 29.5 mL of the same buffer (outer compartment) that contained 0.5 mL of ginseng sample at 37℃ in a water bath. The serosal fluid inside the sacs was sampled at 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, and 1 h. The intestinal transport of the ginseng sample is expressed as ug of total and metabolite ginsenoside/g tissue dry weight. The FRG show a significant difference compared with the NFRG (***p<0.001).