Literature DB >> 12584599

What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery?

A Perez1, M J Zinner, S W Ashley, D C Brooks, E E Whang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although telerobotic technology has entered clinical application, its value for gastrointestinal surgery is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the performance characteristics of telerobotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TALC).
METHODS: All TALCs performed using the da Vinci Surgical System between January 2000 and September 2001 at a tertiary academic medical center were analyzed.
RESULTS: For this study, 20 patients (80% female) with a mean age of 47 +/- 4 years underwent TALC. All had symptomatic cholelithiasis, and all had successful TALC results without complications or need for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLP). The mean procedure time was 152 +/- 8 min. The procedures were performed by one of three staff surgeons experienced in laparoscopic surgery who had training in telerobotic surgery. The perceived advantages of TALC over CLP included easier tissue dissection, enhanced dexterity, and stimulated interest in biliary surgery. The disadvantages included increased operating time and lack of tactile feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: The TALC procedure is effective and safe when performed by appropriately trained surgeons. Telerobotic technology has the potential to reinvigorate gastrointestinal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12584599     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8561-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Robotic assistance in microsurgery.

Authors:  M Siemionow; K Ozer; W Siemionow; G Lister
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.873

2.  Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy between two countries.

Authors:  W K Cheah; B Lee; J E Lenzi; P M Goh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G F Buess; M O Schurr; S C Fischer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-02

4.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fundoplication--initial experiences with the Da Vinci system].

Authors:  E Hanisch; B Markus; C Gutt; T C Schmandra; A Encke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  [Robot arm in laparoscopic surgery].

Authors:  I Baca
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Application of robotics to stereotactic neurosurgery.

Authors:  R F Young
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Automated retinal robotic laser system.

Authors:  S F Barrett; C H Wright; M R Jerath; R S Lewis; B C Dillard; H G Rylander; A J Welch
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  1995

8.  Applications of image-directed robotics in otolaryngologic surgery.

Authors:  K T Kavanagh
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients.

Authors:  J Marescaux; M K Smith; D Fölscher; F Jamali; B Malassagne; J Leroy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  R J Damiano; H A Tabaie; M J Mack; J R Edgerton; C Mullangi; W P Graper; S M Prasad
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  17 in total

1.  Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Natalino Bedin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Diks; J E N Jaspers; W Wisselink; B A M J de Mol; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minilaparoscopic colorectal resection: a preliminary experience and an outcomes comparison with classical laparoscopic colon procedures.

Authors:  Em Santoro; F Agresta; S Veltri; G Mulieri; N Bedin; M Mulieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Annular pancreas in an adult managed by laparobotic surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Kumaran Chinnappan; A Yiengpruksawan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-03-29

5.  Surgical treatment of hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease in complex cases using robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a prospective study/consistent experience in a single institution.

Authors:  Vladimir Schraibman; Antonio Luiz de Vasconcellos Macedo; Samuel Okazaki; Fernando Concilio Mauro; Marina Gabrielle Epstein; Suzan Menasce Goldman; Suzana Lustosa; Delcio Matos
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-06

6.  Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Ward Davies; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  The effect of a silicone-coated robotic needle holder.

Authors:  Norihiko Ishikawa; Go Watanabe; Yasumitsu Hirano; Hideki Moriyama; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-07-19

8.  The patterns and costs of the Da Vinci robotic surgery system in a large academic institution.

Authors:  Rhonda Prewitt; Victor Bochkarev; Corrigan L McBride; Sonja Kinney; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-04-02

9.  Objective evaluation of expert performance during human robotic surgical procedures.

Authors:  Timothy N Judkins; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-04

10.  Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Nam Hyun Baek; Guangyl Li; Seung Hui Choi; In Ho Jeong; Jae Chul Hwang; Jin Hong Kim; Byung Moo Yoo; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.