Literature DB >> 23715025

Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis.

Neel Anand1, Eli M Baron, Babak Khandehroo, Sheila Kahwaty.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: We assess MIS technique's clinical and functional outcomes during a 2- to 5-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional surgical approaches for adult scoliosis are associated with significant blood loss and morbidity, in a population that is often elderly with multiple medical comorbidities. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) represents a newer method of achieving similar long-term outcomes but considerably lower morbidity and complication rates.
METHODS: We reviewed 71 patients who underwent MIS correction of spinal deformity with fusion of 2 or more levels including: degenerative scoliosis (54), idiopathic scoliosis (11), and iatrogenic scoliosis (6). All underwent a combination of 3 MIS techniques: direct lateral interbody fusion (66), axial lumbar interbody fusion (34), and posterior instrumentation (67). Thirty-six patients were staged with direct lateral interbody fusion done first followed by the posterior instrumentation and fusion including axial lumbar interbody fusion done 3 days later.
RESULTS: Mean age was 64 years (20-84 yr). Mean follow-up was 39 months (24-60 mo). Patients with 1-stage same-day surgery had a mean blood loss of 412 mL and a mean surgical time of 291 minutes. Patients with 2-stage surgery had a mean blood loss of 314 mL and surgical time of 183 minutes for direct lateral interbody fusion and 357 mL and 243 minutes, respectively for posterior instrumentation and axial lumbar interbody fusion. Mean hospital stay was 7.6 days (2-26 d). The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 24.7° (8.3°-65°), which corrected to 9.5° (0.6°-28.8°). Mean preoperative Coronal balance was 25.5 mm, which corrected to 11 mm. Mean preoperative sagittal balance was 31.7 mm and corrected to 10.7 mm. The mean preoperative lumbar apical vertebral translation was 24 mm and corrected to 12 mm. Fourteen patients had adverse events requiring intervention: 4 pseudarthrosis, 4 persistent stenosis, 1 osteomyelitis, 1 adjacent segment discitis, 1 late wound infection, 1 proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 screw prominence, 1 idiopathic cerebellar hemorrhage, and 2 wound dehiscence.
CONCLUSION: A combination of 3 novel MIS techniques allows comparable correction of adult spinal deformity, with low pseudarthrosis rates, significantly improved functional outcomes, and excellent clinical and radiological improvement, but considerably lowers morbidity and complication rates at early and long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23715025     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829cb67a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

1.  Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Adam S Kanter; Bryan D Bolinger; Gregory M Mundis; Stacie Nguyen; Praveen V Mummaneni; Neel Anand; Richard G Fessler; Peter G Passias; Paul Park; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Michael Y Wang; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Christopher I Shaffrey; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Samuel K Cho; John I Shin; Yongjung J Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Jonathan S Markowitz; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

5.  Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences.

Authors:  Andrea Zanirato; Marco Damilano; Matteo Formica; Andrea Piazzolla; Alessio Lovi; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Minimally invasive spine surgery for degenerative spine disease and deformity correction: a literature review.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Dionysios Giannoulis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

7.  Minimally invasive surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompression, anterior/lateral and posterior lumbar approaches.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ya Ruth Huo; Jarred A Hogan; Joshua Xu; Alexander Dunn; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs; Patrick McKenna; Trichy Rajagopal; Farhaan Altaf
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

Review 8.  Degenerative Scoliosis.

Authors:  Philip J York; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

9.  The Influence of Lordotic cages on creating Sagittal Balance in the CMIS treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Ryan B Cohen; Jason Cohen; Babak Kahndehroo; Sheila Kahwaty; Eli Baron
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-30

10.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis: a consecutive case series with minimum 2 years follow up.

Authors:  Silviu Sabou; Roberto Carrasco; Rajat Verma; Irfan Siddique; Saeed Mohammad
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.