Literature DB >> 29707548

Minimally invasive spine surgery for degenerative spine disease and deformity correction: a literature review.

Marios G Lykissas1, Dionysios Giannoulis2.   

Abstract

During the last two decades, minimally invasive techniques and instruments in spine surgery have undergone serious development in all fields. Specific advantages of these minimally invasive methods have put them forward in spine surgery in recent times. Preservation of important anatomical structures of the spine is a major factor for the evolution of these procedures. The lower prevalence of complications and faster rehabilitation of patients are some of the advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Due to the increasing use of minimally invasive methods in the clinical practice worldwide, there is a strong need for clarification of basic principles, tips and tricks, complications, and clinical outcomes. This review is an effort to provide a better understanding of some of these procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Percutaneous; endoscopy; interbody fusion; minimally invasive; navigation; scoliosis; spine surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 29707548      PMCID: PMC5900066          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  47 in total

1.  Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Revision of Non-union Following Prior Posterior Surgery: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  David Rouben; Michael Casnellie; Michael Ferguson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-07

3.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Tzinieris; Elefterios Tsiridis; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Choll W Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: pitfalls and complication avoidance.

Authors:  Randall B Graham; Albert P Wong; John C Liu
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 7.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

8.  Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Byungjoo Jung; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Combining pedicle screw stimulation with spinal navigation, a protocol to maximize the safety of neural elements and minimize radiation exposure in thoracolumbar spine instrumentation.

Authors:  Sebouh Z Kassis; Loay K Abukwedar; Abdul Karim Msaddi; Catalin N Majer; Walid Othman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults.

Authors:  Peter Lee; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deviating from the Recommended Torque on Set Screws Can Reduce the Stability and Fatigue Life of Pedicle Screw Fixation Devices.

Authors:  Lien-Chen Wu; Yueh-Ying Hsieh; Fon-Yih Tsuang; Yueh-Feng Chiang; Chang-Jung Chiang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Judith Divera de Rooij; Pravesh Shankar Gadjradj; Hans Aukes; George Groeneweg; Caroline Margina Speksnijder; Frank Johannes Huygen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Traumatic brain injury-the effects of patient age on treatment intensity and mortality.

Authors:  Ola Skaansar; Cathrine Tverdal; Pål Andre Rønning; Karoline Skogen; Tor Brommeland; Olav Røise; Mads Aarhus; Nada Andelic; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.474

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.