Literature DB >> 23713991

Skin physiology in men and women: in vivo evaluation of 300 people including TEWL, SC hydration, sebum content and skin surface pH.

S Luebberding1, N Krueger, M Kerscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence is given that differences in skin physiological properties exist between men and women. However, despite an assessable number of available publications, the results are still inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this clinical study is the first systematic assessment of gender-related differences in skin physiology in men and women, with a special focus on changes over lifetime.
METHODS: A total of 300 healthy male and female subjects (20-74 years) were selected following strict criteria including age, sun behaviour or smoking habits. TEWL, hydration level, sebum production and pH value were measured with worldwide-acknowledged biophysical measuring methods at forehead, cheek, neck, volar forearm and dorsum of hand.
RESULTS: Until the age of 50 men's TEWL is significantly lower than the water loss of women of the same age, regardless of the location. With ageing gender-related differences in TEWL assimilate. Young men show higher SC hydration in comparison with women. But, whereas SC hydration is stable or even increasing in women over lifetime, the skin hydration in men is progressively decreasing, beginning at the age of 40. Sebum production in male skin is always higher and stays stable with increasing age, whereas sebum production in women progressively decreases over lifetime. Across all localizations and age groups, the pH value in men is below 5, the pH value of female subjects is, aside from limited expectations, higher than 5.
CONCLUSION: Skin physiological distinctions between the sexes exist and are particularly remarkable with regard to sebum production and pH value.
© 2013 Society of Cosmetic Scientists and the Société Française de Cosmétologie.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biophysical measuring methods; corneometry; evaporimetry, male skin; pH-metry; sebumetry; skin aging; skin barrier; skin physiology/structure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23713991     DOI: 10.1111/ics.12068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci        ISSN: 0142-5463            Impact factor:   2.970


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Experimental models of human skin aging].

Authors:  G Nikolakis; C Zoschke; E Makrantonaki; C Hausmann; M Schäfer-Korting; C C Zouboulis
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Methods for measuring skin aging].

Authors:  M Zieger; M Kaatz
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Age and Mothers: Potent Influences of Children's Skin Microbiota.

Authors:  Ting Zhu; Xing Liu; Fan-Qi Kong; Yuan-Yuan Duan; Alyson L Yee; Madeline Kim; Carlos Galzote; Jack A Gilbert; Zhe-Xue Quan
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 4.  Materials, Devices, and Systems of On-Skin Electrodes for Electrophysiological Monitoring and Human-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Ganguang Yang; Kanhao Zhu; Shaoyu Liu; Wei Guo; Zhuo Jiang; Zhuo Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 16.806

5.  Measurement of morphological and physiological skin properties in aged care residents: a test-retest reliability pilot study.

Authors:  Robyn Rayner; Keryln Carville; Gavin Leslie; Satvinder S Dhaliwal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Retrieving forensic information about the donor through bacterial profiling.

Authors:  Katherine Phan; Mark Barash; Xanthe Spindler; Peter Gunn; Claude Roux
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Sex-by-formulation interaction in bioequivalence trials with transdermal patches.

Authors:  Esperanza González-Rojano; Julio Marcotegui; Susana Morales-Alcelay; Covadonga Álvarez; John Gordon; Francisco Abad-Santos; Alfredo García-Arieta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  A Comparison of Canine Decontamination Cleansers: Implications for Water Use, Dermal pH, and Contaminant Reduction.

Authors:  Dakota Discepolo; Russ Kelley; Eileen K Jenkins; Stephen Y Liang; Erin Perry
Journal:  J Vet Behav       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Skin Surface pH in Acne Vulgaris: Insights from an Observational Study and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Chaitra Prakash; Puneet Bhargava; Siddhi Tiwari; Banashree Majumdar; Rishi Kumar Bhargava
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 10.  Unbearable transepidermal water loss (TEWL) experimental variability: why?

Authors:  Reva P Peer; Anuk Burli; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.