| Literature DB >> 25541108 |
Vignir Isberg1, Chris de Graaf2, Andrea Bortolato3, Vadim Cherezov4, Vsevolod Katritch5, Fiona H Marshall3, Stefan Mordalski6, Jean-Philippe Pin7, Raymond C Stevens8, Gerrit Vriend9, David E Gloriam10.
Abstract
Generic residue numbers facilitate comparisons of, for example, mutational effects, ligand interactions, and structural motifs. The numbering scheme by Ballesteros and Weinstein for residues within the class A GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors) has more than 1100 citations, and the recent crystal structures for classes B, C, and F now call for a community consensus in residue numbering within and across these classes. Furthermore, the structural era has uncovered helix bulges and constrictions that offset the generic residue numbers. The use of generic residue numbers depends on convenient access by pharmacologists, chemists, and structural biologists. We review the generic residue numbering schemes for each GPCR class, as well as a complementary structure-based scheme, and provide illustrative examples and GPCR database (GPCRDB) web tools to number any receptor sequence or structure.Entities:
Keywords: G protein-coupled receptor; ligand binding; mutational effects; sequence alignments; structural motifs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25541108 PMCID: PMC4408928 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Pharmacol Sci ISSN: 0165-6147 Impact factor: 14.819