S Beddhu1, F J Bruns, M Saul, P Seddon, M L Zeidel. 1. Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In a university-based dialysis program, we found that 25% of the patients accounted for 50% of the costs and 42% of the deaths. We determined whether the Charlson Comorbidity Index, a simple measure of comorbid conditions, could predict clinical outcomes and costs in these patients. METHODS: Patients on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis from July 1996 to June 1998 at the University of Pittsburgh outpatient dialysis unit were studied. Comorbidity scores and outcomes were determined by reviewing the Medical Archival Retrieval System database and outpatient records. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight patients were observed for 293 patient-years. The Comorbidity Index strongly predicted admission rate (relative risk per each unit increase = 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 1.23, P = 0.0001), hospital days and inpatient costs (both P <0.0001), and mortality (relative risk per unit increase = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.39, P = 0.0002.). Age and diabetes, used in the Health Care Financing Administration dialysis capitation model, correlated poorly with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Charlson Comorbidity Index predicts outcomes and costs in dialysis patients. This index may be useful in determining appropriate payment for care of dialysis patients under capitated payment schemes and as a research tool to stratify dialysis patients in order to compare the outcomes of various interventions.
PURPOSE: In a university-based dialysis program, we found that 25% of the patients accounted for 50% of the costs and 42% of the deaths. We determined whether the Charlson Comorbidity Index, a simple measure of comorbid conditions, could predict clinical outcomes and costs in these patients. METHODS:Patients on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis from July 1996 to June 1998 at the University of Pittsburgh outpatient dialysis unit were studied. Comorbidity scores and outcomes were determined by reviewing the Medical Archival Retrieval System database and outpatient records. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight patients were observed for 293 patient-years. The Comorbidity Index strongly predicted admission rate (relative risk per each unit increase = 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 1.23, P = 0.0001), hospital days and inpatient costs (both P <0.0001), and mortality (relative risk per unit increase = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.39, P = 0.0002.). Age and diabetes, used in the Health Care Financing Administration dialysis capitation model, correlated poorly with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Charlson Comorbidity Index predicts outcomes and costs in dialysis patients. This index may be useful in determining appropriate payment for care of dialysis patients under capitated payment schemes and as a research tool to stratify dialysis patients in order to compare the outcomes of various interventions.
Authors: Mehdi Rambod; Rachelle Bross; Jennifer Zitterkoph; Deborah Benner; Juhi Pithia; Sara Colman; Csaba P Kovesdy; Joel D Kopple; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Scott V Adams; Matthew Rivara; Elani Streja; Alfred K Cheung; Onyebuchi A Arah; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Rajnish Mehrotra Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Lilia Cervantes; Michel Chonchol; Romana Hasnain-Wynia; John F Steiner; Edward Havranek; Madelyne Hull; John Rice; Jessica Kendrick; Xochilt Alamillo; Claudia Camacho; Stacy Fischer Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.947