Literature DB >> 23710970

Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a comprehensive review.

Eric C H Lai1, Chung Ngai Tang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article reviews the current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.
METHOD: Searches of MEDLINE and PubMed databases were conducted using the keywords "laparoscopic pancreatectomy," "robotic surgery," "pancreaticoduodenectomy" and "distal pancreatectomy" to find articles published between January 1990 and September 2012. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references in key articles.
RESULTS: Only cases reports, cohort series and nonrandomized comparative studies were available to validate the outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. There was no randomized controlled trial comparing the robotic approach to the laparoscopic or open approach. To the best of our knowledge, only four studies have compared the robotic approach and the open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy, and four studies have been published comparing the robotic approach and the laparoscopic approach for distal pancreatectomy. The data were difficult to interpret because of the heterogeneity of the pathologies and techniques used. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy for appropriately selected patients can be performed safely, with postoperative complication rates and mortality rate comparable to results observed with laparoscopic or open techniques. Robotic surgical systems also seem to improve the spleen-preservation rate in distal pancreatectomy. The oncologic outcomes have not yet been adequately evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy are safe and feasible in appropriately selected patients. However, because of uncertainties regarding long-term oncologic outcome, caution should be exercised in assessing the appropriateness of this operation for individual patients. Further randomized and controlled studies are required to support the routine use of the robotic technology for pancreatectomy.
© 2013 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic pancreatectomy; Whipple's operation; robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23710970     DOI: 10.1111/ases.12040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg        ISSN: 1758-5902


  16 in total

1.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study for short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

3.  Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26

Review 4.  Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Tung Wu; Yu-Yin Liu; Shang-Yu Wang; Shih-Ching Kang; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Giovanni Butturini; Ugo Boggi; Andrea Pietrabissa; Luca Morelli; Fabio Vistoli; Isacco Damoli; Andrea Peri; Claudio Fiorillo; Luigi Pugliese; Marco Ramera; Nelide De Lio; Gregorio Di Franco; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Fausto Rosa; Roberta Menghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Giuseppe Quero
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  A multicenter survey on distal pancreatectomy in Italy: results of minimally invasive technique and variability of perioperative pathways.

Authors:  G Balzano; M Bissolati; U Boggi; C Bassi; A Zerbi; M Falconi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-11-28

7.  Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Qian Zhan; Jiang-zhi Chen; Jia-bin Jin; Xia-xing Deng; Hao Chen; Bai-yong Shen; Cheng-hong Peng; Hong-wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Qi-Yu Liu; Wen-Zhi Zhang; Hong-Tian Xia; Jian-Jun Leng; Tao Wan; Bin Liang; Tao Yang; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Impact of the transection plan on postoperative pancreatic fistulas occurring after robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Lihan Qian; Binwei Hu; Jiancheng Wang; Xiongxiong Lu; Xiaxing Deng; Weimin Chai; Zhiwei Xu; Weishen Wang; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection for gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Takashi Shirobe; Shotaro Maruyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.