Literature DB >> 25429722

A multicenter survey on distal pancreatectomy in Italy: results of minimally invasive technique and variability of perioperative pathways.

G Balzano1, M Bissolati, U Boggi, C Bassi, A Zerbi, M Falconi.   

Abstract

No data are available about distal pancreatectomy (DP) in Italy, regarding variability of care among centers, and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in a multicenter setting. Hence, a survey was conducted among 20 institutions experienced in pancreatic surgery by the Italian Association for Study of Pancreas. Centers were asked to fill in two questionnaires about (1) general approach and perioperative protocols for DP and MIDP; (2) detailed operative results of MIDP in the period 2010-2011. Results of questionnaire 1: a great variability in perioperative approach was observed: octreotide was used in 50 % of centers, enzyme supplementation in 35 %, postoperative gastric suction in 80 % and oral liquids on day 1 in 55 %. All hospitals used at least one drain and its removal ranged between days 3-5 (in absence of fistula). Differences in type and timing of post-splenectomy vaccinations were recorded. As regards MIDP, 17/20 centers performed laparoscopic or robotic DP. MIDP rate on overall DP varied among centers (range 0-82 %) and it doubled from 2007 (14 %) to 2011 (28 %). Results of questionnaire 2: in the period 2010-2011, 171 MIDP were performed (140 laparoscopic, 31 robotic). Overall conversion rate was 17 %, mean operative time was 230 min and blood loss 285 ml. Mortality was nil and morbidity was 62 %, with 4 % relaparotomies. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 49 % (grade A 35 %, B 14 %). Mean postoperative stay was 9.8 days with 10 % readmission rate. The results indicated a great variability in DP management among Italian centers. Most centers performed MIDP, but MIDP rate on overall DP largely varied among centers. As regards MIDP conversion rate and hospital stay were found to be worse than those in single-institution series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25429722     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-014-0273-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  46 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study.

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Claudio Ricci; Marielda D'Ambra; Nicola Marrano; Vincento Alagna; Daniela Rega; Francesco Monari; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-12

3.  Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study.

Authors:  Sandeep S Vijan; Kamran A Ahmed; William S Harmsen; Florencia G Que; Kaye M Reid-Lombardo; David M Nagorney; John H Donohue; Michael B Farnell; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-07

4.  Mesh reinforcement of pancreatic transection decreases incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure for left pancreatectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hamilton; Matthew R Porembka; Fabian M Johnston; Feng Gao; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Stefano Partelli; Andrea Coratti; Jacopo Desiderio; Amilcare Parisi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  G Balzano; A Zerbi; M Braga; S Rocchetti; A A Beneduce; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Immune responses of splenectomized trauma patients to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine at 1 versus 7 versus 14 days after splenectomy.

Authors:  D V Shatz; M F Schinsky; L B Pais; S Romero-Steiner; O C Kirton; G M Carlone
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-05

8.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Riccardo Ariotti; Giovanni Capretti; Massimiliano Greco; Gianpaolo Balzano; Renato Castoldi; Luigi Beretta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Lu Feng; Jichun Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Marc G Besselink; Awad Shamali; Giovanni Butturini; Olivier R Busch; Bjørn Edwin; Roberto Troisi; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Ibrahim Dagher; Claudio Bassi; Mohammad Abu Hilal
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Niccolò Napoli; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Vittorio Grazio Perrone; Mario Miccoli; Stefania Brozzetti; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 4.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

5.  Robotics in HPB surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Hanna; Charles Imber
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Trends.

Authors:  Georgios D Lianos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Christos Katsios; Georgios K Glantzounis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-06

7.  Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference.

Authors:  Bjørn Edwin; Mushegh A Sahakyan; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink; Marco Braga; Jean-Michel Fabre; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Igor E Khatkov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gian Piero Guerrini; Andrea Lauretta; Claudio Belluco; Matteo Olivieri; Marco Forlin; Stefania Basso; Bruno Breda; Giulio Bertola; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.