Single-molecule studies on PolySUMO proteins reveal their mechanical flexibility.

Proteins with β-sandwich and β-grasp topologies are resistant to mechanical unfolding as shown by single-molecule force spectroscopy studies. Their high mechanical stability has generally been associated with the mechanical clamp geometry present at the termini. However, there is also evidence for the importance of interactions other than the mechanical clamp in providing mechanical stability, which needs to be tested thoroughly. Here, we report the mechanical unfolding properties of ubiquitin-like proteins (SUMO1 and SUMO2) and their comparison with those of ubiquitin. Although ubiquitin and SUMOs have similar size and structural topology, they differ in their sequences and structural contacts, making them ideal candidates to understand the variations in the mechanical stability of a given protein topology. We observe a two-state unfolding pathway for SUMO1 and SUMO2, similar to that of ubiquitin. Nevertheless, the unfolding forces of SUMO1 (∼130 pN) and SUMO2 (∼120 pN) are lower than that of ubiquitin (∼190 pN) at a pulling speed of 400 nm/s, indicating their lower mechanical stability. The mechanical stabilities of SUMO proteins and ubiquitin are well correlated with the number of interresidue contacts present in their structures. From pulling speed-dependent mechanical unfolding experiments and Monte Carlo simulations, we find that the unfolding potential widths of SUMO1 (∼0.51 nm) and SUMO2 (∼0.33 nm) are much larger than that of ubiquitin (∼0.19 nm), indicating that SUMO1 is six times and SUMO2 is three times mechanically more flexible than ubiquitin. These findings might also be important in understanding the functional differences between ubiquitin and SUMOs.