| Literature DB >> 23705749 |
Shusheng Zhou1, Xiaoguang Chao, Mingming Fei, Yuanyuan Dai, Bao Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus epidermidis is a common pathogen in medical device-associated infections and have an ability to form adherent slime. We aimed to study the effects of icaA and icaD genes on the slime formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis associated with catheter-associated infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23705749 PMCID: PMC3671247 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Glass-surface slime production by cultures on CRA. A) Black colonies of slime-producing S. epidermidis ATCC 35984. B) Red colonies of the non-slime-producing S. epidermidis ATCC 12228. CRA: Congo Red Agar.
Figure 2Colorimetric scale adopted for colony evaluation by Congo red agar. vr, very red; r, red; brd, Bordeaux; ab, almost black; b, black; vb, very black.
Figure 3A scanning electron microscopy image shows a laboratory-grown biofilm. Image A shows normal slime-producing strains; B shows slime-producing strain ATCC 35984; C shows non-slime-producing strain ATCC 12228. Scale bar 2 μm. Image taken by Fu, Instruments’ Center for Physical Science, University of Science & Technology China.
Figure 4PCR detection of icaA, icaD, and mecA. Lane 1, 100 bp DNA molecular size marker. Image A shows mecA locus (A, 224-bp band), lanes 2–10, PCR amplification of mecA, lanes 2, ATCC25923. Lane 7, negative control; lanes 3 to 10, PCR amplicons obtained with DNA of S. epidermidis; B shows icaA locus (B, 198-bp band),lanes 2–9, PCR amplification of icaA. Lane 8, ATCC 35984 (RP62A). Lane 9, ATCC 12228. Lanes 2–7, amplification obtained with DNA of clinical S. epidermidis isolate. C shows icaD locus (C, 198-bp band), lanes 2–13, PCR amplification of icaD. Lane 2, ATCC 35984 (RP62A). Lane 3, ATCC 12228. Lanes 4–13, amplification obtained with DNA of clinical S. epidermidis isolate.
Association between slime production on congo red agar and presence of and genes in the 82 strains
| 1 | 22 | 0.894 | 0.000◇ | 0.459 | 0.036△ | 1.000 | 0.000◇ | 0.686 | 0.001☆ |
| 2 | 21 | 0.679 | 0.001◇ | 0.439 | 0.047△ | 0.748 | 0.000◇ | 0.553 | 0.009☆ |
| 3 | 19 | 0.701 | 0.001◇ | 0.406 | 0.085 | 0.782 | 0.000◇ | 0.456 | 0.049☆ |
| 4 | 20 | 0.533 | 0.015△ | 0.408 | 0.074 | 0.698 | 0.001◇ | 0.535 | 0.015☆ |
Group 1, blood isolates obtained from patients’ IV line; Group 2, nasal isolates of healthy volunteers; Group 3, nasal isolates of the same patients in Group 1; Group 4, nasal isolates of ICU staff. △The correlation between the presence of the operon and the presence of slime production in all groups (p<0.05). ◇The correlation between the presence of the operon and the presence of slime production in all groups (p<0.001). ☆The correlation between the presence of MecA and icaD (p<0.05).
Association between slime production on congo red agar and presence of and genes in the 82 strains
| 1 | 22 | 15 (68.18%) | 16 (72.72%) | 20 (90.91%) | 15 (68.18%) | 20 |
| 2 | 21 | 8 (38.10%)△ | 12 (57.14%) | 15 (71.43%) | 11 (52.38%) | 14 |
| 3 | 19 | 5 (26.32%)◇ | 8 (42.11%) | 15 (78.95%) | 7 (36.84%) | 14 |
| 4 | 20 | 8 (40.00%)◇ | 12 (60.00%) | 17 (85.00%) | 12 (60.00%) | 14 |
Group 1, blood isolates obtained from patients’ IV line; Group 2, nasal isolates of healthy volunteers; Group 3, nasal isolates of the same patients in Group 1; Group 4, nasal isolates of ICU staff. △Values are given as slime production of S. epidermidis strains vs first group (p<0.05), ◇Values are given as slime production of S. epidermidis strains vs first group (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference among other three groups (P>0.05).