Literature DB >> 17221196

Susceptibility of staphylococcal biofilms to enzymatic treatments depends on their chemical composition.

P Chaignon1, I Sadovskaya, Ch Ragunah, N Ramasubbu, J B Kaplan, S Jabbouri.   

Abstract

Bacterial infections are serious complications after orthopaedic implant surgery. Staphylococci, with Staphylococcus epidermidis as a leading species, are the prevalent and most important species involved in orthopaedic implant-related infections. The biofilm mode of growth of these bacteria on an implant surface protects the organisms from the host's immune system and from antibiotic therapy. Therapeutic agents that disintegrate the biofilm matrix would release planktonic cells into the environment and therefore allow antibiotics to eliminate the bacteria. An addition of a biofilm-degrading agent to a solution used for washing-draining procedures of infected orthopaedic implants would greatly improve the efficiency of the procedure and thus help to avoid the removal of the implant. We have previously shown that the extracellular staphylococcal matrix consists of a poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG), extracellular teichoic acids (TAs) and protein components. In this study, we accessed the sensitivity of pre-formed biofilms of five clinical staphylococcal strains associated with orthopaedic prosthesis infections and with known compositions of the biofilm matrix to periodate, Pectinex Ultra SP, proteinase K, trypsin, pancreatin and dispersin B, an enzyme with a PNAG-hydrolysing activity. We also tested the effect of these agents on the purified carbohydrate components of staphylococcal biofilms, PNAG and TA. We found that the enzymatic detachment of staphylococcal biofilms depends on the nature of their constituents and varies between the clinical isolates. We suggest that a treatment with dispersin B followed by a protease (proteinase K or trypsin) could be capable to eradicate biofilms of a variety of staphylococcal strains on inert surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221196     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-006-0790-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  69 in total

Review 1.  Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal.

Authors:  Diane McDougald; Scott A Rice; Nicolas Barraud; Peter D Steinberg; Staffan Kjelleberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  IsdC from Staphylococcus lugdunensis induces biofilm formation under low-iron growth conditions.

Authors:  Antonino Missineo; Antonella Di Poto; Joan A Geoghegan; Simonetta Rindi; Simon Heilbronner; Valentina Gianotti; Carla Renata Arciola; Timothy J Foster; Pietro Speziale; Giampiero Pietrocola
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Immobilized Hydrolytic Enzymes Exhibit Antibiofilm Activity Against Escherichia coli at Sub-Lethal Concentrations.

Authors:  Federica Villa; Francesco Secundo; Andrea Polo; Francesca Cappitelli
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 4.  Staphylococcal Biofilms.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2018-08

5.  Novel thermostable lipase from Bacillus circulans IIIB153: comparison with the mesostable homologue at sequence and structure level.

Authors:  S Johri; A Bhat; S Sayed; A Nargotra; A Jain; G N Qazi
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.

Authors:  David Lebeaux; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Christophe Beloin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 7.  Biofouling of Polyamide Membranes: Fouling Mechanisms, Current Mitigation and Cleaning Strategies, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Jane Kucera
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-30

Review 8.  Staphylococcus epidermidis--the 'accidental' pathogen.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 9.  From clinical microbiology to infection pathogenesis: how daring to be different works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  Kristi L Frank; José Luis Del Pozo; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Staphylococcus aureus CcpA affects biofilm formation.

Authors:  Kati Seidl; Christiane Goerke; Christiane Wolz; Dietrich Mack; Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Markus Bischoff
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.