BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate relationships between the degree of early reperfusion achieved on perfusion-weighted imaging and clinical outcomes in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution studies. We hypothesized that there would be a strong correlation between the degree of reperfusion achieved and clinical outcomes in target mismatch (TMM) patients. METHODS: The degree of reperfusion was calculated on the basis of the difference in perfusion-weighted imaging volumes (time to maximum of tissue residue function [Tmax]>6 s) between the baseline MRI and the early post-treatment follow-up scan. Patients were grouped into quartiles, on the basis of degree of reperfusion achieved, and the association between the degree of reperfusion and clinical outcomes in TMM and no TMM patients was assessed. Favorable clinical response was determined at day 30 on the basis of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and good functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90. RESULTS: This study included 121 patients; 98 of these had TMM. The median degree of reperfusion achieved was not different in TMM patients (60%) versus No TMM patients (64%; P=0.604). The degree of reperfusion was strongly correlated with both favorable clinical response (P<0.001) and good functional outcome (P=0.001) in TMM patients; no correlation was present in no TMM. The frequency of achieving favorable clinical response or good functional outcome was significantly higher in TMM patients in the highest reperfusion quartile versus the lower 3 quartiles (88% versus 41% as odds ratio, 10.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-37.5; and 75% versus 34% as odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-16.7, respectively). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 90% as the optimal reperfusion threshold for predicting good functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: The degree of reperfusion documented on perfusion-weighted imaging after reperfusion therapies corresponds closely with clinical outcomes in TMM patients. Reperfusion of ≥90% of the perfusion lesion is an appropriate goal for reperfusion therapies to aspire to.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate relationships between the degree of early reperfusion achieved on perfusion-weighted imaging and clinical outcomes in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution studies. We hypothesized that there would be a strong correlation between the degree of reperfusion achieved and clinical outcomes in target mismatch (TMM) patients. METHODS: The degree of reperfusion was calculated on the basis of the difference in perfusion-weighted imaging volumes (time to maximum of tissue residue function [Tmax]>6 s) between the baseline MRI and the early post-treatment follow-up scan. Patients were grouped into quartiles, on the basis of degree of reperfusion achieved, and the association between the degree of reperfusion and clinical outcomes in TMM and no TMMpatients was assessed. Favorable clinical response was determined at day 30 on the basis of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and good functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90. RESULTS: This study included 121 patients; 98 of these had TMM. The median degree of reperfusion achieved was not different in TMMpatients (60%) versus No TMMpatients (64%; P=0.604). The degree of reperfusion was strongly correlated with both favorable clinical response (P<0.001) and good functional outcome (P=0.001) in TMMpatients; no correlation was present in no TMM. The frequency of achieving favorable clinical response or good functional outcome was significantly higher in TMMpatients in the highest reperfusion quartile versus the lower 3 quartiles (88% versus 41% as odds ratio, 10.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-37.5; and 75% versus 34% as odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-16.7, respectively). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 90% as the optimal reperfusion threshold for predicting good functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: The degree of reperfusion documented on perfusion-weighted imaging after reperfusion therapies corresponds closely with clinical outcomes in TMMpatients. Reperfusion of ≥90% of the perfusion lesion is an appropriate goal for reperfusion therapies to aspire to.
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Jun Lee; Soren Christensen; Matus Straka; Deidre A De Silva; Michael Mlynash; Bruce C Campbell; Roland Bammer; Jean-Marc Olivot; Patricia Desmond; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Gregory W Albers Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Matus Straka; Stephanie Kemp; Michael Mlynash; Lawrence R Wechsler; Tudor G Jovin; Michael J Wilder; Helmi L Lutsep; Todd J Czartoski; Richard A Bernstein; Cherylee W J Chang; Steven Warach; Franz Fazekas; Manabu Inoue; Aaryani Tipirneni; Scott A Hamilton; Greg Zaharchuk; Michael P Marks; Roland Bammer; Gregory W Albers Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Mark Parsons; Neil Spratt; Andrew Bivard; Bruce Campbell; Kong Chung; Ferdinand Miteff; Bill O'Brien; Christopher Bladin; Patrick McElduff; Chris Allen; Grant Bateman; Geoffrey Donnan; Stephen Davis; Christopher Levi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Vincent N Thijs; Lawrence Wechsler; Stephanie Kemp; Gottfried Schlaug; Elaine Skalabrin; Roland Bammer; Wataru Kakuda; Maarten G Lansberg; Ashfaq Shuaib; William Coplin; Scott Hamilton; Michael Moseley; Michael P Marks Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Pooja Khatri; Joddi Neff; Joseph P Broderick; Jane C Khoury; Janice Carrozzella; Thomas Tomsick Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Randall T Higashida; Anthony J Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Mark W Parsons; Christopher Levi; Kenneth S Butcher; Andre Peeters; P Alan Barber; Christopher Bladin; Deidre A De Silva; Graham Byrnes; Jonathan B Chalk; John N Fink; Thomas E Kimber; David Schultz; Peter J Hand; Judith Frayne; Graeme Hankey; Keith Muir; Richard Gerraty; Brian M Tress; Patricia M Desmond Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Joseph P Broderick; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Sharon D Yeatts; Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Bernard Yan; Frank L Silver; Rüdiger von Kummer; Carlos A Molina; Bart M Demaerschalk; Ronald Budzik; Wayne M Clark; Osama O Zaidat; Tim W Malisch; Mayank Goyal; Wouter J Schonewille; Mikael Mazighi; Stefan T Engelter; Craig Anderson; Judith Spilker; Janice Carrozzella; Karla J Ryckborst; L Scott Janis; Renée H Martin; Lydia D Foster; Thomas A Tomsick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Bourcier; S Volpi; B Guyomarch; B Daumas-Duport; A Lintia-Gaultier; C Papagiannaki; J M Serfaty; H Desal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andrew Bivard; Venkatesh Krishnamurthy; Peter Stanwell; Nawaf Yassi; Neil J Spratt; Michael Nilsson; Christopher R Levi; Stephen Davis; Mark W Parsons Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Ying Zhou; Ruiting Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Shenqiang Yan; Ze Wang; Bruce C V Campbell; David S Liebeskind; Min Lou Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Won Hyung A Ryu; Michael B Avery; Navjit Dharampal; Isabel E Allen; Steven W Hetts Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 5.836