BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholesterol levels are inconsistently associated with the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The purpose of this study is to assess their relationships using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for pertinent articles published in English. Only prospective studies that reported effect estimates with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) of hemorrhagic stroke for ≥3 categories of cholesterol levels, for high and low comparison, or for per 1 mmol/L increment of cholesterol concentrations were included. We used the random-effects model to pool the study-specific results. RESULTS: Twenty-three prospective studies were included, totaling 1 430 141 participants with 7960 (5.6%) hemorrhagic strokes. In high versus low analysis, the summary relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.81) for total cholesterol, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.80-1.19) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41-0.92) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In dose-response analysis, the summary relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke for 1 mmol/L increment of total cholesterol was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91), for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.99-1.25), and for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.05). The pooled relative risk for intracerebral hemorrhage was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.02-1.35) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Total cholesterol level is inversely associated with risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol seems to be associated with lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol level seems to be positively associated with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Cholesterol levels are inconsistently associated with the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The purpose of this study is to assess their relationships using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for pertinent articles published in English. Only prospective studies that reported effect estimates with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) of hemorrhagic stroke for ≥3 categories of cholesterol levels, for high and low comparison, or for per 1 mmol/L increment of cholesterol concentrations were included. We used the random-effects model to pool the study-specific results. RESULTS: Twenty-three prospective studies were included, totaling 1 430 141 participants with 7960 (5.6%) hemorrhagic strokes. In high versus low analysis, the summary relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.81) for total cholesterol, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.80-1.19) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41-0.92) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In dose-response analysis, the summary relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke for 1 mmol/L increment of total cholesterol was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91), for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.99-1.25), and for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.05). The pooled relative risk for intracerebral hemorrhage was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.02-1.35) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Total cholesterol level is inversely associated with risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol seems to be associated with lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol level seems to be positively associated with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Authors: Yun Shen; Lizheng Shi; Elizabeth Nauman; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Alessandra N Bazzano; Somesh Nigam; Gang Hu Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690