Literature DB >> 23703380

Risk stratification among diabetic patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Abhijit Ghatak1, Santosh Padala, Deborah M Katten, Donna M Polk, Gary V Heller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that diabetic patients undergoing single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are at greater risk for cardiac events than non-diabetic patients with both normal and abnormal imaging results. However, the impact of stress modality on outcomes in this patient group has not been examined.
METHODS: The data on all patients undergoing exercise stress or vasodilator stress SPECT MPI from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. After excluding patients based on our predefined criteria, we subcategorized the study population into diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients. Among the diabetic patients, we identified patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and no known CAD. All studies were interpreted using the 17-segment ASNC model. The presence, extent, and severity of perfusion defects were calculated using the summed stress score (SSS), and patients were classified into normal (SSS < 4), mildly abnormal (SSS 4-8), and moderate-severely abnormal (SSS > 8) categories. The annualized cardiac event rate including cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction was calculated over a mean follow-up period of 2.4 ± 1.4 years with a maximum of 6 years.
RESULTS: The cardiac event rate was statistically significantly lower in diabetic patients undergoing exercise stress MPI when compared to the diabetic patients undergoing pharmacological stress MPI across all three perfusion categories (1.3% vs 3.4%, 2.3% vs 5.7%, 4.2% vs 10.7%, respectively). Diabetic patients with no known CAD, who underwent exercise stress MPI had significantly lower cardiac events across all three perfusion categories as compared to the remainder of the diabetic population. Ability to perform exercise stress test was the strongest multivariate predictor of favorable outcome, whereas ejection fraction < 50%, abnormal perfusion imaging on SPECT MPI, and increasing age stood out as independent predictors of adverse outcome in the diabetic patients. Within the abnormal perfusion category, the annualized cardiac event rate among patients undergoing exercise stress SPECT MPI was not statistically different between the diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients undergoing exercise SPECT MPI have a significantly better prognosis than those undergoing pharmacological stress, more similar to patients without diabetes. In patients with diabetes exercise stress test MPI identifies low risk patients and provides precise risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23703380     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-013-9731-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  26 in total

1.  Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Management of coronary artery disease: therapeutic options in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  T Hammoud; J F Tanguay; M G Bourassa
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparative ability of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  X Kang; D S Berman; H Lewin; R Miranda; J Erel; J D Friedman; A M Amanullah
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Stress testing in patients with diabetes mellitus: diagnostic and prognostic value.

Authors:  Anne R Albers; Marc Z Krichavsky; Gary J Balady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  X Kang; D S Berman; H C Lewin; I Cohen; J D Friedman; G Germano; R Hachamovitch; L J Shaw
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Prediction of cardiovascular events in clinically selected high-risk NIDDM patients. Prognostic value of exercise stress test and thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  G Vanzetto; S Halimi; T Hammoud; D Fagret; P Y Benhamou; D Cordonnier; B Denis; J Machecourt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Can the reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on stress gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT predict a future cardiac event?

Authors:  Nunzia Rosa Petix; Stelvio Sestini; Gabriella Marcucci; Angela Coppola; Angela Arena; Franco Nassi; Andrea Taiti; Vincenzo Guarnaccia; Alberto Mennuti; Vincenzo Mazzoni
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Importance of estimated functional capacity as a predictor of all-cause mortality among patients referred for exercise thallium single-photon emission computed tomography: report of 3,400 patients from a single center.

Authors:  C E Snader; T H Marwick; F J Pashkow; S A Harvey; J D Thomas; M S Lauer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Exercise capacity and all-cause mortality in African American and Caucasian men with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter Kokkinos; Jonathan Myers; Eric Nylen; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Athanasios Manolis; Andreas Pittaras; Marc R Blackman; Roshney Jacob-Issac; Charles Faselis; Joshua Abella; Steven Singh
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 17.152

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Effectively Risk Stratifies Diabetic Patients With Suspected Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Hui Liu; Siddique Abbasi; Ravi Shah; Ron Blankstein; Michael Steigner; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Francesca Maio; Stefania Daniele; Carmela Nappi; Valeria Gaudieri; Giorgio Punzo; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Coronary risk equivalence of diabetes assessed by SPECT-MPI.

Authors:  Donna Chelle V Morales; Sanjeev P Bhavnani; Alan W Ahlberg; Raja C Pullatt; Deborah M Katten; Donna M Polk; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Renato Cuocolo; Stefania Daniele; Valeria Cantoni; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Cardiovascular risk stratification in diabetic patients following stress single-photon emission-computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: the impact of achieved exercise level.

Authors:  Santosh K Padala; Abhijit Ghatak; Sandeep Padala; Deborah M Katten; Donna M Polk; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.