Literature DB >> 10220646

Comparative ability of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

X Kang1, D S Berman, H Lewin, R Miranda, J Erel, J D Friedman, A M Amanullah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetics generally have more frequent and extensive silent myocardial ischemia than nondiabetics, increasing the importance of noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in this cohort. However, little is known regarding the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with diabetes. This study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic value of rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with and without diabetes.
METHODS: Of the 203 patients with diabetes and 260 patients without diabetes who underwent dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT with exercise or pharmacologic stress testing, 138 diabetics (12% type 1 diabetics) and 188 nondiabetics had coronary angiography within 6 months of the nuclear test, and 65 diabetics and 72 nondiabetics had a low likelihood (<10%, mean 6% +/- 3% and 6% +/- 3%) of CAD.
RESULTS: The angiographic data showed that patients with diabetes had less incidence of 1-vessel disease and a higher incidence of 3-vessel/left main artery disease than patients without diabetes (P <.05). The overall sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of SPECT for detecting CAD with the criterion of >/=50% diameter stenosis were 86% (95 of 111) and 56% (15 of 27) in diabetics, 86% (122 of 142) and 46% (21 of 46) in nondiabetics (P = not significant). With the criterion of >/=70% diameter stenosis the corresponding results were 90% (86 of 96) and 50% (21 of 42) in diabetics, and 91% (108 of 119) and 43% (30 of 69) in nondiabetics, respectively (P = not significant). The normalcy rate for low likelihood patients was 89% (58 of 65) in diabetics and 90% (65 of 72) in nondiabetics (P = not significant). The sensitivity and specificity for individual vessel detection were also similar in patients with and without diabetes (P = not significant) except for a lower sensitivity and a higher specificity for detecting left anterior descending coronary artery disease in the diabetic group (P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT has comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of CAD in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220646     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70421-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  36 in total

1.  Is a revision of the "nuclear cardiology warranty" in order?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas; Michael I Miyamoto
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in a study population without post-test referral bias.

Authors:  Allan Johansen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Henrik Wulff Christensen; Werner Vach; Henrik Boel Jørgensen; Annegrete Veje; Torben Haghfelt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging: a summary of the currently available literature.

Authors:  Roger D Des Prez; Leslee J Shaw; Robert L Gillespie; Wael A Jaber; Gavin L Noble; Prem Soman; David G Wolinsky; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus should be screened for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Frans J Th Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  "Mismatch" in regional myocardial perfusion defects during exercise and pharmacologic vasodilation: a noninvasive marker of epicardial vasomotor dysfunction?

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Heinrich H Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Gavin L Noble; Gary V Heller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Cardiovascular imaging in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Diagnosis of CAD in patients with diabetes: who to evaluate.

Authors:  Lawrence H Young; Powell Jose; Deborah Chyun
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  A comparative evaluation of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion spect imaging in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Ozgür Omür; Zehra Ozcan; Murat Argon; Ebru Tani Acar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Screening for coronary artery disease in diabetic patients: a commentary.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Alan Rozanski; Jamal S Rana; Leslee J Shaw; Nathan D Wong; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.