IMPORTANCE: Controlled family studies have consistently found that obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aggregates in families but have typically relied on samples recruited from specialist clinics. Furthermore, previous studies could not disentangle genetic from environmental factors contributing to the observed familiality. OBJECTIVE: To provide unbiased estimates of familial risk for and heritability of OCD at the population level. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based, multigenerational, case-control family and twin studies using the Swedish National Patient Register, Multi-Generation Register, and Twin Register. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals diagnosed as having OCD between January 1, 1969, and December 31, 2009 (n = 24 768) and all their available first-, second-, and third-degree relatives, as well as nonbiological relatives and matched general population control subjects. Twins (n = 16 383) were included from the population-based Twin Register. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The risk for OCD among relatives of OCD probands. RESULTS: The risk for OCD among relatives of OCD probands increased proportionally to the degree of genetic relatedness. The risk for first-degree relatives was significantly higher than that for second- and third-degree and nonbiological relatives. Second-degree relatives had higher risk for OCD than third-degree relatives. Relatives at similar genetic distances had similar risks for OCD, despite different degrees of shared environment. Separate twin modeling analyses confirmed that familial risk for OCD was largely attributable to additive genetic factors (47%; 95% CI, 42%-52%), with no significant effect of shared environment. Nonbiological relatives (spouses or partners who have at least 1 child together) also had an elevated risk for OCD (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.99-3.42). Early-onset probands (3907 individuals; mean age, 13.7 years) had slightly (nonsignificantly) higher familial risk than the total sample, although this was substantially lower than previously reported. There were no significant sex differences in the familial pattern or heritability estimates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Obsessive-compulsive disorder clusters in families primarily due to genetic factors. Nonshared environmental factors are at least as important. The quest for candidate genes, nonshared environmental risk factors, and their possible correlation or interaction should continue. The finding of possible assortative mating in OCD is intriguing and should be investigated further.
IMPORTANCE: Controlled family studies have consistently found that obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aggregates in families but have typically relied on samples recruited from specialist clinics. Furthermore, previous studies could not disentangle genetic from environmental factors contributing to the observed familiality. OBJECTIVE: To provide unbiased estimates of familial risk for and heritability of OCD at the population level. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based, multigenerational, case-control family and twin studies using the Swedish National Patient Register, Multi-Generation Register, and Twin Register. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals diagnosed as having OCD between January 1, 1969, and December 31, 2009 (n = 24 768) and all their available first-, second-, and third-degree relatives, as well as nonbiological relatives and matched general population control subjects. Twins (n = 16 383) were included from the population-based Twin Register. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The risk for OCD among relatives of OCD probands. RESULTS: The risk for OCD among relatives of OCD probands increased proportionally to the degree of genetic relatedness. The risk for first-degree relatives was significantly higher than that for second- and third-degree and nonbiological relatives. Second-degree relatives had higher risk for OCD than third-degree relatives. Relatives at similar genetic distances had similar risks for OCD, despite different degrees of shared environment. Separate twin modeling analyses confirmed that familial risk for OCD was largely attributable to additive genetic factors (47%; 95% CI, 42%-52%), with no significant effect of shared environment. Nonbiological relatives (spouses or partners who have at least 1 child together) also had an elevated risk for OCD (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.99-3.42). Early-onset probands (3907 individuals; mean age, 13.7 years) had slightly (nonsignificantly) higher familial risk than the total sample, although this was substantially lower than previously reported. There were no significant sex differences in the familial pattern or heritability estimates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Obsessive-compulsive disorder clusters in families primarily due to genetic factors. Nonshared environmental factors are at least as important. The quest for candidate genes, nonshared environmental risk factors, and their possible correlation or interaction should continue. The finding of possible assortative mating in OCD is intriguing and should be investigated further.
Authors: Ashley E Nordsletten; Henrik Larsson; James J Crowley; Catarina Almqvist; Paul Lichtenstein; David Mataix-Cols Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: David Mataix-Cols; Bjarne Hansen; Manuel Mattheisen; Elinor K Karlsson; Anjené M Addington; Julia Boberg; Diana R Djurfeldt; Matthew Halvorsen; Paul Lichtenstein; Stian Solem; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Jan Haavik; Gerd Kvale; Christian Rück; James J Crowley Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Xiang-Zhen Kong; Premika S W Boedhoe; Yoshinari Abe; Pino Alonso; Stephanie H Ameis; Paul D Arnold; Francesca Assogna; Justin T Baker; Marcelo C Batistuzzo; Francesco Benedetti; Jan C Beucke; Irene Bollettini; Anushree Bose; Silvia Brem; Brian P Brennan; Jan Buitelaar; Rosa Calvo; Yuqi Cheng; Kang Ik K Cho; Sara Dallaspezia; Damiaan Denys; Benjamin A Ely; Jamie Feusner; Kate D Fitzgerald; Jean-Paul Fouche; Egill A Fridgeirsson; David C Glahn; Patricia Gruner; Deniz A Gürsel; Tobias U Hauser; Yoshiyuki Hirano; Marcelo Q Hoexter; Hao Hu; Chaim Huyser; Anthony James; Fern Jaspers-Fayer; Norbert Kathmann; Christian Kaufmann; Kathrin Koch; Masaru Kuno; Gerd Kvale; Jun Soo Kwon; Luisa Lazaro; Yanni Liu; Christine Lochner; Paulo Marques; Rachel Marsh; Ignacio Martínez-Zalacaín; David Mataix-Cols; Sarah E Medland; José M Menchón; Luciano Minuzzi; Pedro S Moreira; Astrid Morer; Pedro Morgado; Akiko Nakagawa; Takashi Nakamae; Tomohiro Nakao; Janardhanan C Narayanaswamy; Erika L Nurmi; Joseph O'Neill; Jose C Pariente; Chris Perriello; John Piacentini; Fabrizio Piras; Federica Piras; Christopher Pittenger; Y C Janardhan Reddy; Oana Georgiana Rus-Oswald; Yuki Sakai; Joao R Sato; Lianne Schmaal; H Blair Simpson; Noam Soreni; Carles Soriano-Mas; Gianfranco Spalletta; Emily R Stern; Michael C Stevens; S Evelyn Stewart; Philip R Szeszko; David F Tolin; Aki Tsuchiyagaito; Daan van Rooij; Guido A van Wingen; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Zhen Wang; Je-Yeon Yun; Paul M Thompson; Dan J Stein; Odile A van den Heuvel; Clyde Francks Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Pedro Macul Ferreira de Barros; Maria Conceição do Rosário; Natalia Szejko; Natália Polga; Guaraci de Lima Requena; Beatriz Ravagnani; Daniel Fatori; Marcelo Camargo Batistuzzo; Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter; Luis Augusto Rohde; Guilherme Vanoni Polanczyk; James Frederick Leckman; Eurípedes Constantino Miguel; Pedro Gomes de Alvarenga Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Celia van der Merwe; Neda Jahanshad; Josh W Cheung; Mary Mufford; Nynke A Groenewold; Nastassja Koen; Rajkumar Ramesar; Shareefa Dalvie; James A Knowles; Derrek P Hibar; Caroline M Nievergelt; Karestan C Koenen; Israel Liberzon; Kerry J Ressler; Sarah E Medland; Rajendra A Morey; Paul M Thompson; Dan J Stein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Caleb M Pardue; Nicholas J Sibrava; Christina L Boisseau; Maria C Mancebo; Jane L Eisen; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 1.677
Authors: Ana Pérez-Vigil; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Gustaf Brander; Kayoko Isomura; Andreas Jangmo; Inna Feldman; Eva Hesselmark; Eva Serlachius; Luisa Lázaro; Christian Rück; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Brian M D'Onofrio; Henrik Larsson; David Mataix-Cols Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Martin Cederlöf; Laura M Thornton; Jessica Baker; Paul Lichtenstein; Henrik Larsson; Christian Rück; Cynthia M Bulik; David Mataix-Cols Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Sandra M Meier; Liselotte Petersen; Manuel Mattheisen; Ole Mors; Preben B Mortensen; Thomas M Laursen Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 27.083