Literature DB >> 23699052

Simultaneous encoding of the direction and orientation of potential targets during reach planning: evidence of multiple competing reach plans.

Brandie M Stewart1, Lee A Baugh, Jason P Gallivan, J Randall Flanagan.   

Abstract

Reaches performed in many natural situations involve selecting a specific target from a number of alternatives. Recent studies show that before reaching, multiple potential reach targets are encoded in brain regions involved in action control and that, when people are required to initiate the reach before the target is specified, initial hand direction is biased by the spatial distribution of potential targets. These findings have led to the suggestion that the brain, during planning, simultaneously prepares multiple reaches to potential targets. In addition to hand direction, reach planning often involves specifying other parameters such as wrist orientation. For example, when posting a letter in a mail slot, both the location and orientation of the slot must be encoded to control hand direction and orientation. Therefore, if the brain prepares multiple reaches to potential targets and if these targets require the specification of hand direction and orientation, then both of these variables should be biased by the spatial distribution of potential targets. To test this prediction, we examined a task in which participants moved a hand-held rectangular tool toward multiple rectangular targets of varying location and orientation, one of which was selected, with equal probability as the actual target after movement initiation. We found that initial hand direction and orientation were biased by the spatial distributions of potential target locations and orientations, respectively. This result is consistent with the idea that the brain, in cases of target uncertainty, simultaneously plans fully specified reaching movements to all potential targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; goal-directed action; human; visually guided reaching

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23699052     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00131.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Rapid Automatic Motor Encoding of Competing Reach Options.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Brandie M Stewart; Lee A Baugh; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Parallel specification of competing sensorimotor control policies for alternative action options.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Lindsey Logan; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The sequential encoding of competing action goals involves dynamic restructuring of motor plans in working memory.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Natasha A R Bowman; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Motor cortex guides selection of predictable movement targets.

Authors:  Philip J W Woodgate; Soeren Strauss; Saber A Sami; Dietmar Heinke
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Action plan co-optimization reveals the parallel encoding of competing reach movements.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Kathryn S Barton; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Hedging your bets: intermediate movements as optimal behavior in the context of an incomplete decision.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; David M Huberdeau; John W Krakauer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.