Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is the most abundant membrane-associated isoform of the P450 family in humans and is responsible for biotransformation of more than 50% of drugs metabolized in the body. Despite the large number of crystallographic structures available for CYP3A4, no structural information for its membrane-bound state at an atomic level is available. In order to characterize binding, depth of insertion, membrane orientation, and lipid interactions of CYP3A4, we have employed a combined experimental and simulation approach in this study. Taking advantage of a novel membrane representation, highly mobile membrane mimetic (HMMM), with enhanced lipid mobility and dynamics, we have been able to capture spontaneous binding and insertion of the globular domain of the enzyme into the membrane in multiple independent, unbiased simulations. Despite different initial orientations and positions of the protein in solution, all the simulations converged into the same membrane-bound configuration with regard to both the depth of membrane insertion and the orientation of the enzyme on the surface of the membrane. In tandem, linear dichroism measurements performed on CYP3A4 bound to Nanodisc membranes were used to characterize the orientation of the enzyme in its membrane-bound form experimentally. The heme tilt angles measured experimentally are in close agreement with those calculated for the membrane-bound structures resulted from the simulations, thereby verifying the validity of the developed model. Membrane binding of the globular domain in CYP3A4, which appears to be independent of the presence of the transmembrane helix of the full-length enzyme, significantly reshapes the protein at the membrane interface, causing conformational changes relevant to access tunnels leading to the active site of the enzyme.
Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is the most abundant membrane-associated isoform of the P450 family in humans and is responsible for biotransformation of more than 50% of drugs metabolized in the body. Despite the large number of crystallographic structures available for CYP3A4, no structural information for its membrane-bound state at an atomic level is available. In order to characterize binding, depth of insertion, membrane orientation, and lipid interactions of CYP3A4, we have employed a combined experimental and simulation approach in this study. Taking advantage of a novel membrane representation, highly mobile membrane mimetic (HMMM), with enhanced lipid mobility and dynamics, we have been able to capture spontaneous binding and insertion of the globular domain of the enzyme into the membrane in multiple independent, unbiased simulations. Despite different initial orientations and positions of the protein in solution, all the simulations converged into the same membrane-bound configuration with regard to both the depth of membrane insertion and the orientation of the enzyme on the surface of the membrane. In tandem, linear dichroism measurements performed on CYP3A4 bound to Nanodisc membranes were used to characterize the orientation of the enzyme in its membrane-bound form experimentally. The heme tilt angles measured experimentally are in close agreement with those calculated for the membrane-bound structures resulted from the simulations, thereby verifying the validity of the developed model. Membrane binding of the globular domain in CYP3A4, which appears to be independent of the presence of the transmembrane helix of the full-length enzyme, significantly reshapes the protein at the membrane interface, causing conformational changes relevant to access tunnels leading to the active site of the enzyme.
Cytochrome P450 (CYP)
constitutes a large family of heme-containing
enzymes that are present in a wide variety of organisms and are involved
in the metabolism of both xenobiotics (e.g., drugs) and endogenous
compounds such as steroidal hormones.[1] CYPs
are found in both soluble and membrane-bound forms. They function
by oxidizing a broad spectrum of both water-soluble and lipophilic
molecules. One of the key aspects of their function is the mechanism
and pathway by which various molecular species gain access to the
active site of the enzyme, a process that is particularly important
for membrane-associated CYPs. The crystal structures of a large number
of CYPs, in both apo and substrate-bound forms, have been solved;
however, they provide limited information on these pathways.[2] In particular, substrate access through the membrane,
which is suggested to be the main mechanism for lipophilic and amphiphilic
substrates to gain access to the active site of CYPs,[3,4] is largely unknown, as a complete description of the involved pathways
relies on the characterization of the enzyme structure, and more importantly
its dynamics, in its membrane-associated form.Human CYPs are
anchored in the cellular membrane by an N-terminal
transmembrane α helix.[5,6] However, a large body
of evidence strongly suggests that the globular, enzymatic part of
the protein directly interacts with the surface of the membrane.[6−8] Naturally, such direct interactions are key to the orientation and
partitioning of the enzyme on the surface of the membrane, which are
the main determinants of substrate’s efficient access to the
enzyme from the membrane.In humans, cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)
is the most abundant isoform.
It is present in the liver and in the small intestine,[9] and it is responsible for the metabolism of more than 50%
of clinically used drugs that are metabolized in the body,[10,11] indicating a high ligand promiscuity when compared to other humanCYP enzymes. Due to its broad involvement in drug metabolism, CYP3A4
plays a key role in determining the bioavailability and, thereby,
the effective plasma concentration of a wide range of pharmacological
compounds in the body. Similarly, CYP3A4 is a key element in side
effects of drugs in which the metabolites are the main source of toxicity,
as well as in drug–drug interactions due to its promiscuous
substrate specificity and malleable active site.[12,13] To date, over 1000 compounds, including inhibitors and inducers
of CYP3A4, have been identified that interact with and affect the
activity of CYP3A4.[14]Accumulating
evidence has strongly indicated that the interaction
of CYPs with the cellular membrane contributes to the recruitment
of liposoluble substrates to the active site of the enzyme.[3,4] Therefore, in order to understand its effects in the body, it is
crucial to understand the interaction of CYP3A4 with the membrane
at an atomic resolution. To date, several X-ray structures of CYP3A4
with a truncated N-terminal transmembrane helix have been solved,
both in the ligand-free form and bound to a variety of ligands.[12,15−19] These structures have not only established that CYP3A4 presents
an overall fold similar to other CYPs (Figure 1) but also revealed functionally relevant aspects, such as the ability
of CYP3A4 to bind to a broad range of molecules of different sizes[12,15−19] and a malleable active site that might even allow binding of two
ligands simultaneously,[12] a feature that
had been suggested on the basis of the atypical kinetic behavior exhibited
by the enzyme.[20−22]
Figure 1
Structure of CYP3A4: two views, rotated by 90°, showing
the
side (left) and bottom (right) views of the globular domain. A schematic
of the location of the TM helix with respect to the globular domain
is included in the side view. The structure presents a fold similar
to other P450 enzymes, consisting of an N-terminal β-sheet domain
and a helical C-terminal domain, containing the cofactor heme (red
stick representation) and the active site. The nomenclature used for
the secondary structure elements was adopted from ref (54). The side chains forming
A-anchor are shown in orange stick representation in both views and
boxed in the side view. Also depicted in the figure is a schematic
representation of the HMMM membrane, highlighting the location of
the organic phase and the short-tailed lipids.
Structure of CYP3A4: two views, rotated by 90°, showing
the
side (left) and bottom (right) views of the globular domain. A schematic
of the location of the TM helix with respect to the globular domain
is included in the side view. The structure presents a fold similar
to other P450 enzymes, consisting of an N-terminal β-sheet domain
and a helical C-terminal domain, containing the cofactor heme (red
stick representation) and the active site. The nomenclature used for
the secondary structure elements was adopted from ref (54). The side chains forming
A-anchor are shown in orange stick representation in both views and
boxed in the side view. Also depicted in the figure is a schematic
representation of the HMMM membrane, highlighting the location of
the organic phase and the short-tailed lipids.Structural dynamics of human CYPs have been studied with
molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations. Several previous MD studies of CYP3A4 aimed
at studying the interaction of the enzyme with some of its ligands,
focusing on the gating mechanisms involved in the access/egress of
the ligands from the active site[23,24] and on the
underlying mechanism of positive homotropic cooperativity observed
upon binding of two ligands.[25] Other simulation
studies investigated the dynamics of water molecules in different
human CYPs, including CYP3A4.[26] Despite
providing insightful information about the dynamics of CYP3A4, these
studies were performed mostly without taking into account the interaction
of the enzyme with a membrane, which could affect both structural
and dynamical properties of CYP3A4. In a recent simulation study of
membrane-bound CYP3A4 by Denisov et al.,[27] it was shown that interaction with the membrane affects the opening/closing
of the access tunnels observed in the crystal structures. Moreover,
MD studies with humanCYP2C9 in the presence of the membrane have
shown that interaction of the enzyme with the membrane favors the
opening of additional access tunnels not identified in the crystal
structures.[28,29]An experimentally observable
yet unexplored aspect of CYP3A4 is
the orientation of the enzyme in its membrane-bound form. The angle
between the heme plane and the membrane plane, termed the heme tilt
angle, has been estimated experimentally to be between 38° and
78° for several other CYPs isoforms[30] but not for CYP3A4. For CYP2C9, MD studies have suggested that the
enzyme might even adopt two different orientations upon membrane binding,
corresponding to two different conformations of the F-G loop of this
isoform.[29] The orientation that the enzyme
takes after binding to the membrane might have implications not only
in efficient substrate recruitment but also in the rate of electron
transfer from the CYP reductase necessary for the oxidation reaction.[29,31]In order to study the binding and interaction of CYP3A4 with
the
membrane, we have performed MD simulations employing a novel membrane
representation, termed highly mobile membrane mimetic (HMMM), which
was recently developed in our lab.[32] This
membrane model employs a biphasic solvent system[33] together with short-tailed lipids located at the organic/water
interface. Due to the reduced entanglement of the shortened lipid
tails and the fluid nature of the hydrophobic core, the HMMM membrane
allows for an increase of 1–2 orders of magnitude in the lateral
diffusion of the lipids, thereby accelerating the association of proteins
with the bilayer without the need for external biases or forces, while
preserving the atomistic details of the interactions between the protein
and lipid headgroups.[32] In multiple independent
simulations, spontaneous binding and insertion of the globular domain
of CYP3A4 was captured, resulting in a convergent model for the membrane-bound
form of CYP3A4, whose insertion depth and orientation on the membrane
are preserved after transformation of the HMMM model to a full lipid
bilayer. Complementary to the simulations, a series of planar waveguide
linear dichroism measurements were performed to characterize the heme
tilt angle of CYP3A4 bound to a Nanodisc, a membrane system that is
water-soluble and preserves the structure and activity of membrane
proteins.[34] The measurements were performed
by first determining the dichroic ratio of a monolayer of Nanodisc-incorporated
CYP3A4 protein, and then calculating the orientation of the CYP3A4
within the lipid bilayer. Together, the structural models resulting
from the simulations and experimental measurements allow for a detailed
description of the enzyme in its membrane-bound form. Furthermore,
the simulations also reveal some of the membrane-induced conformational
changes in CYP3A4 that might affect the accessibility of the active
site to substrates approaching from the membrane.
Materials and Methods
Details of the simulations and
experiments are presented in the
following two sections. A more detailed description of derivation
of the dichroic ratio is included in Supporting
Information.
Simulation Procedures
Preparation of HMMM Membrane
The HMMM membrane patch
was constructed by placing two leaflets of short-tailed lipids at
the interface of water and 1,1-dichloroethane (DCLE), as described
in detail elsewhere.[32] The phosphatidylcholine
(PC) headgroup was selected for this study because of its relevance
to membrane composition of eukaryotic cells. The lipids used in the
membrane patch were constructed starting from palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine
(POPC) molecule as a template and shortening its lipid tails to only
five carbons.[32] The HMMM membrane was then
assembled by use of Packmol software[35] by
constructing a DCLE box, with dimensions of 100 × 100 ×
10 Å3 and containing 5840 molecules of the organic
solvent, and placing 300 short-tailed PC lipids on its large faces,
with 150 lipids in each leaflet. The resulting structure was then
solvated with water by use of the SOLVATE plugin of VMD,[36] yielding a system of ∼66 000 atoms.
The solvated membrane mimetic system was energy-minimized for 10 000
steps and simulated for 2 ns, by use of an NPAT ensemble with constant area, and with a target normal pressure
and temperature of 1.0 atm and 310 K, respectively. A constant area
of 11 236 Å2 (106 × 106 Å2) was employed, yielding an area of ∼75 Å2/lipid (AL), which is ∼8% higher
than the experimental AL for POPC.[37] This was done to account for the area of the
membrane that would be occupied by the protein upon its insertion.
On the basis of our experience with several other peripheral proteins,
a mild increase (5–8%) in the area can significantly accelerate
the process. The resulting membrane was employed in all subsequent
simulations of membrane binding and dynamics of CYP3A4.
CYP3A4 Model
and Initial Configurations
The ligand-free
crystal structure of CYP3A4[16] was obtained
from the RCSB Protein Data Bank[38] (PDB
entry 1TQN).
The missing residues Lys-282, Glu-283, Thr-284, and Glu-285 were added
by use of the program MODELLER 9v10.[39] Crystallographic
water molecules were maintained in the model. For the first part of
this study the N-terminal transmembrane (TM) helix (27 residues),
which is also missing from the crystal structures, was not modeled,
as the main aim was to independently characterize membrane binding
and insertion of the globular domain of the enzyme. In the second
part of the study, two models including the TM helix were constructed
by adding the TM helix to one of the membrane-bound CYP3A4 structures
obtained from the simulations in the first part of the study. One
model included all N-terminal 27 residues of CYP3A4 (full-length CYP3A4),
while the other model included a truncated TM helix, which does not
include the first 12 residues and has a S18F point mutation. These
systems are referred to as WT-TM and truncated-TM simulation systems,
respectively. The truncated-TM model was designed and simulated to
match the sequence of CYP3A4 employed during the experimental measurements
reported in this study. The additional TM residues were added to the
membrane-bound CYP3A4 by use of MODELLER 9v10.[39]In the first set of simulations, hereby referred
to as “membrane binding” simulations, the globular domain
of CYP3A4 (i.e., without the TM helix) was placed in five different
initial orientations and between 7 and 13 Å above the surface
of the membrane. These systems will be referred to as Mem-1 through
Mem-5 hereafter. The initial orientations were obtained by first aligning
the three principal axes of the protein to the xyz axes, respectively, and then rotating the principal axis aligned
to z in different planes, thus resulting in five
different initial heme tilt angles. An additional layer of water was
then added to the resulting structure by use of the SOLVATE plugin,
and a concentration of 100 mM Na+ and Cl– ions was generated in the systems by use of the AUTOIONIZE plugin
of VMD.[36] The resulting initial systems
then consisted of a box with dimensions 100 × 100 × 130
Å3 and containing ∼140 000 atoms. In
addition and as a control, CYP3A4 was also simulated in an aqueous
solution, that is, in the absence of a membrane. For the solution
simulation, CYP3A4 was solvated with water by use of the SOLVATE plugin
of VMD with a minimum padding of 10 Å in all directions, resulting
in a box with dimensions of 89 × 95 × 107 Å3 including ∼62 000 atoms. All systems were energy-minimized
for 10 000 steps and relaxed further for 100 ps with the Cα
atoms of the protein restrained (k = 5 kcal·mol–1·Å–2), except for the
residues that were modeled and added to the crystal structure. Then
systems Mem-1 through Mem-5 and the solvated CYP3A4 were simulated
each for 50 ns, while systems WT-TM and truncated-TM were simulated
each for 40 ns. For the HMMM simulations, a harmonic constraint on
the z-position, with a force constant k = 0.05 kcal·mol–1·Å–2, was applied to the carbonyl atoms of the PC lipids, in order to
restrain the position of the short-tailed lipids to mimic the atomic
distributions of a full lipid bilayer more closely and to prevent
their occasional diffusion into the aqueous solution, which is expected
for short-tailed lipids (surfactants).In addition to the HMMM
simulation systems, and in order to further
examine the stability and dynamics of the resulting membrane-bound
CYP3A4 from these simulations, a simulation employing a full POPClipid bilayer was also performed. A membrane-bound model of the globular
domain of CYP3A4 was adopted from one of the last frames of one of
the HMMM simulations described above. The lipid bilayer was then grown
(transformed) into a full lipid bilayer by removing the DCLE molecules
and adding the missing carbons of the lipid tails while preserving
the positions of the lipid atoms already present in the HMMM model
(headgroups and initial few carbons of the lipid tails). In order
to further optimize the process, the positions of the newly added
atoms in the lipid tails were based on the coordinates of randomly
selected lipid molecules from a separately equilibrated POPC membrane.
During these steps, the original contacts established between the
lipids and CYP3A4 during the HMMM membrane-binding simulations were
preserved. This system, which is referred to as the POPC system, was
then minimized and equilibrated for 100 ps while constraining the
heavy atoms of the protein, the short-tailed lipids (already present
before adding the new atoms) to allow for the newly added atoms to
relax. Following this step, the system was simulated without constraints
for 40 ns.
Simulation Conditions and Protocols
All the simulations
were performed with NAMD2[40] utilizing the
CHARMM27 force field with cMAP[41] corrections
for the protein and CHARMM36[42] for lipids.
The TIP3P model was used for water.[43] All
simulations, except system POPC, were performed as an NPAT ensemble at 1.0 atm and 310 K and with a time
step of 2 fs. The POPC system was simulated as an NPT ensemble. A
constant area of 11 236 Å2 (106 × 106
Å2) was employed for NPAT. Constant pressure was maintained by the Nosé–Hoover
Langevin piston method,[44,45] and constant temperature
was maintained by Langevin dynamics with a damping coefficient γ
of 0.5 ps–1 applied to all atoms. Nonbonded interactions
were cut off after 12 Å with a smoothing function applied after
10 Å. The particle mesh Ewald (PME) method[46] was used for long-range electrostatic calculations with
a grid density greater than 1 Å–3.
Identification
of Access Tunnels to the Active Site
Access tunnels to the
active site were characterized by use of MolAxis,[47] which identifies tunnels and cavities in macromolecules
via computational geometry techniques. Snapshots of the protein were
obtained every 100 ps from the last 40 ns of the trajectories, which
in all the membrane binding simulations corresponded to the period
after CYP3A4 has completed its binding and insertion into the membrane.
The access tunnels to the active site were calculated for each snapshot.
In order to cluster the tunnels calculated for each different snapshots,
an average structure over the last 40 ns of the trajectory of the
bound CYP3A4 for each simulated system was obtained and the access
tunnels of these average structures were used as references for their
respective system. Then, for each system, the spatial overlap between
each reference tunnel and each tunnel from the trajectory snapshots
was calculated. Tunnels from different snapshots were assumed to be
the same when they had a spatial overlap of at least 70% with the
same reference tunnel. The bottleneck radius and the bottleneck residues
for each identified access tunnel were obtained from the MolAxis calculations.
All tunnels with a bottleneck radius ≥1.2 Å were included
in the analysis of open cavities within the protein.
Experimental
Procedures
CYP3A4 was expressed with a
histidine affinity tag from the NF-14 construct in the pCWOri+ vector,
purified, and incorporated into POPC Nanodisc lipid bilayers as previously
described.[34] The Nanodiscs were stored
in a buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4,
and 0.3 M NaCl) before use. A commercially available 405 nm diode
laser was used in the laser module. The laser spot was reduced by
use of an iris, and any stray polarization was excluded by use of
a Glan-Taylor polarizer (Melles Griot). The laser assembly was mounted
on a rotational stage to precisely modulate the polarization of light.
The laser was shone on the glass slide assembly, which used two BK7
prisms (Edmund Optics) to couple the light in and out of the internal
reflection element (IRE). The IRE substrates used were SuperClean
2 microarray substrates (Arrayit Corp.) with dimensions of 25 ×
76 × 0.940 mm. The out-coupled light went through a band-pass
filter and onto a light diffuser before being detected by a phototube
(Oriel Instruments). The output of the phototube was amplified by
a low-noise current amplifier (Stanford Research Systems) before being
measured by a digital multimeter (Hewlett-Packard). The background
signal was measured by placing several drops of the buffer on a glass
substrate slide and measuring the signal. In order to facilitate adsorption
onto the glass slide, MgCl2 was added to the buffer before
addition of Nanodiscs.[48] Subsequently,
CYP3A4 Nanodiscs were added to the buffer on the substrate so that
total concentration of CYP3A4 was ∼100 nM and total concentration
of MgCl2 was 10 mM. Adsorbed Nanodiscs formed a thin monolayer
film at the interface between the glass slide and the bulk solution.
After 30 min (required for adsorption), the slide was flushed with
3 volumes of buffer to wash away nonadsorbed analytes. The final signal
was compared to the background signal to calculate the thin film absorbance.
Calculation
of CYP3A4 Orientation from Linear Dichroism Measurements
Light inside an IRE is totally reflected internally and has no
transmitted element. From the electric field amplitudes of the evanescent
wave along the laboratory axes, it is possible to calculate the absorbance
of a chromophore that is adsorbed to the surface of the IRE.[49] Since a heme ring can be modeled as a circular
oscillator[50] and the transition moments
are degenerate, the absorbance can be broken down into the three components
along the laboratory axes and simplified to the following three equations:[49]where
μ is the absorption transition
moment; E, E, and E are the components of the electric field; and θ,
the orientation angle, is the angle between the transition moment
and the laboratory z-axis. The subscripts TE and
TM refer to transverse electric polarized and transverse magnetic
polarized light, respectively. TE polarized light is oriented in the y direction, and only absorbers with a transition moment
component in the y direction will absorb it, whereas
TM polarized light is oriented in the x and z directions, thus only absorbers with transition moment
components lying in the x or z direction
will be able to absorb this light. The ratio of the absorbance of
TE to TM polarized light, the dichroic ratio, can be used to determine
the orientation of the absorber.[51] The
following equation relates the dichroic ratio to the orientation angle,
using eqs 1, 2, and 3:where ρ
is the dichroic ratio and θ
is the angle between the transition moment vector and the laboratory z-axis. Since CYP3A4 is a heme protein, it is possible to
use the heme as the absorber and monitor the orientation of the protein
in the lipid bilayer. The heme moiety has a strong absorption at the
Soret band, with CYP3A4 having a molar absorptivity on the order of
106 M–1·cm–1.
Results
and Discussion
Spontaneous Binding and Insertion of CYP3A4
into the Membrane
In order to study the binding of CYP3A4
to the membrane, five different
orientations of the globular domain of the enzyme (not including the
TM helix) initially placed above the PC lipid bilayer were simulated,
each for 50 ns (Mem-1 to Mem-5). Spontaneous binding of CYP3A4 with
the HMMM membrane was consistently observed in all the simulations.
Membrane binding did not require the use of external forces or biasing
potentials, thus resulting in an unbiased positioning of the enzyme
at the lipid–water interface within the first 10 ns of simulation.
For the five different starting positions tested, CYP3A4 first encounters
the membrane through its hydrophobic helices F′ and G′ (Figure 1) and
with a hydrophobic
anchor composed of residues Leu-44, Pro-45, Phe-46, and Leu-47. This
hydrophobic anchor, which is located between helices A″ and
A and that we term A-anchor hereafter, is one of the features that
distinguishes CYP3A4 from other CYP isoforms. A-anchor has been hypothesized
to mediate the interaction with the membrane,[15] together with the hydrophobic helices F′ and G′,[7,16] on the basis of its location in the globular domain of the enzyme.
After the first encounter with the membrane, the enzyme is rapidly
inserted into the membrane and remains bound to it for the remainder
of the simulation, as exemplified in Figure 2 for simulation Mem-1. In less than 10 ns, A-anchor establishes contacts
with the lipid headgroups, as characterized by monitoring the position
of the anchor with respect to PO4 and choline groups (Figure 2). In systems Mem-2 and Mem-5, A-anchor remains
buried below the PO4 level for the remainder of the simulation,
while in systems Mem-1, Mem-3, and Mem-4, the anchor fluctuates within
the region between the PO4 and the choline groups. Interestingly,
and functionally highly relevant,
A-anchor inserts deeper into the membrane than helices F′ and
G′. Helices F′ and G′ are stabilized at a level
close to the lipid headgroups after 10 ns (Figure 2) but do not completely insert into the membrane, with helix
G′ establishing a closer contact to the membrane than helix
F′. For the five independent membrane binding simulations,
the depth of insertion of A-anchor and of helices F′ and G′
converges to the same range of values, with the residues located in
these three elements forming the majority of the hydrophobic contacts
between CYP3A4 and the membrane after insertion (Figure S1, Supporting Information).
Figure 2
Spontaneous insertion
of CYP3A4 into the membrane. (Top) Snapshots
taken at different time points from the simulation system Mem-1. (Bottom
right) Close-up view of the membrane-bound form of CYP3A4, highlighting
residues inserting directly into and interacting with the membrane.
The hydrophobic side chains of A-anchor, formed by residues Leu-44,
Pro-45, Phe-46, and Leu-47, and of helix G′ are shown in stick
representation in orange and magenta, respectively. (Bottom left)
Time evolution of average height of the center of mass of A-anchor
and helices F′ and G′ in different simulations. The
average height is shown for the five simulations. The average positions
of the phosphorus (PO4) group and the nitrogen (choline)
atoms of the lipid headgroups are shown as gray and brown dotted lines,
respectively.
Spontaneous insertion
of CYP3A4 into the membrane. (Top) Snapshots
taken at different time points from the simulation system Mem-1. (Bottom
right) Close-up view of the membrane-bound form of CYP3A4, highlighting
residues inserting directly into and interacting with the membrane.
The hydrophobic side chains of A-anchor, formed by residues Leu-44,
Pro-45, Phe-46, and Leu-47, and of helix G′ are shown in stick
representation in orange and magenta, respectively. (Bottom left)
Time evolution of average height of the center of mass of A-anchor
and helices F′ and G′ in different simulations. The
average height is shown for the five simulations. The average positions
of the phosphorus (PO4) group and the nitrogen (choline)
atoms of the lipid headgroups are shown as gray and brown dotted lines,
respectively.
Orientation of Membrane-Bound
CYP3A4
Experimentally,
it is difficult to measure characteristic parameters of membrane-bound
proteins, such as depth of insertion or orientation. In the case of
CYPs, although measuring the insertion depth remains a difficult task,
it is possible to measure their orientation by taking advantage of
the optical properties of the heme moiety buried in the active site.
The orientation of some CYP isoforms associated with proteoliposomes
or microsomes[30] has been measured experimentally;
however, such experiments have not been reported for CYP3A4. A series
of linear dichroism measurements were performed in this study to calculate
the orientation of CYP3A4 in POPC Nanodiscs. The Nanodisc approach
has been employed to study the metabolic mechanisms of CYP3A4 in a
phospholipid bilayer.[34] The orientation
of the Nanodisc-bound CYP3A4 was calculated by measuring the angle
between the heme moiety and the z-axis from the dichroic
ratio measured from the sample (see Materials and
Methods). A total of 11 independent experiments were carried
out. The calculated angles are presented in Table 1. The
heme tilt angle of CYP3A4
in the Nanodisc exhibits values between 52.0° and 67.3°,
with an average of 59.7°. These measurements suggest that the
CYP3A4 bound to the POPC Nanodiscs adopts a specific orientation,
rather than a nonspecific adsorption to the membrane surface.
Table 1
Experimental Measurements of Heme
Tilt Angle for CYP3A4 Bound to POPC Nanodisc
experiment
tilt angle
(deg)
1
61.1
2
57.5
3
57.5
4
61.1
5
58.8
6
52.0
7
60.0
8
55.9
9
62.9
10
67.3
11
62.9
avg
59.7 ± 4.1
From the simulations, the positioning of the globular
domain of
CYP3A4 after binding to the membrane was studied more thoroughly by
defining a set of angles that characterize the orientation of its
membrane-bound form. The orientation of CYP3A4 after association with
the membrane was characterized by measuring the heme tilt angle with
respect to the membrane normal (z-axis). The time
evolution of the heme tilt angle for the five simulated membrane systems
(Mem-1 to Mem-5) is presented in Figure 3.
The tilt angle converges to a value around 70° in about 10 ns,
corresponding to the time of binding of CYP3A4 to the membrane. For
the remainder of the simulations, the tilt angle fluctuates between
70° and 80°. In Table 2, the initial
and average values of the tilt angle for each simulated system are
shown, with the average obtained over the last 40 ns of the simulation,
that is, the portion corresponding to the membrane-bound form of the
enzyme. The average heme tilt angle is calculated to be between 68.7°
and 75.9° for individual simulations, with an overall average
of 72.2° over the five simulations. The calculated average angles
strongly support the convergence of the simulations; despite using
very different initial orientations in solution, the final tilt angles
in all the simulations are very similar and deviate by only a few
degrees. This suggests that, as observed in the experiments, CYP3A4
adopts a specific orientation upon binding to the membrane, with the
heme moiety oriented at approximately 70° with respect to the
membrane normal.
Figure 3
Orientation of CYP3A4 upon binding to the membrane: time
series
of the heme tilt angle for the five membrane simulations (Mem-1 to
Mem-5). The heme plane was defined by fitting the position of the
four porphyrin nitrogen atoms to a plane. The angle θ is defined
as the angle between the membrane normal (z-axis)
and the heme plane.
Table 2
Initial
and Average Heme Tilt Angle
Calculated for CYP3A4 in Five Independent Membrane-Binding Simulationsa
run
initial tilt
angle (deg)
avg tilt
angle (deg)
Mem-1
55.2
75.9 (3.9)
Mem-2
33.9
69.1 (5.3)
Mem-3
51.9
72.9 (3.7)
Mem-4
59.9
74.4 (5.0)
Mem-5
81.0
68.7 (3.7)
avg
72.2 (3.2)
Averages were
calculated from
the last 40 ns of each simulation corresponding to the membrane-bound
form of CYP3A4. Standard deviations are given in parentheses.
Orientation of CYP3A4 upon binding to the membrane: time
series
of the heme tilt angle for the five membrane simulations (Mem-1 to
Mem-5). The heme plane was defined by fitting the position of the
four porphyrinnitrogen atoms to a plane. The angle θ is defined
as the angle between the membrane normal (z-axis)
and the heme plane.Averages were
calculated from
the last 40 ns of each simulation corresponding to the membrane-bound
form of CYP3A4. Standard deviations are given in parentheses.In order to examine the structure
and dynamics of the membrane-bound
model for CYP3A4 that was developed with the HMMM membrane model,
we put the model to a test simulation performed in a full membrane.
While we might not expect to capture the complete insertion process
using such a full representation for the membrane within our limited
simulation time scales (the main reason for using the HMMM model),
we have adopted the membrane-bound configuration from an HMMM simulation
and performed additional equilibrium simulations (40 ns) after transforming
the lipids to full POPClipid molecules (see Materials
and Methods). As depicted in Figure 4, the membrane-bound configuration is highly preserved; both the
depth of membrane insertion and the orientation show similar average
values and range of fluctuation to those obtained from membrane binding
simulations.
Figure 4
Orientation and depth of insertion of CYP3A4 in a full
POPC membrane.
(Top) Time evolution of the heme tilt angle and (bottom) average height
of the center of mass of A-anchor and helices F′ and G′
are shown for CYP3A4 bound to a full POPC membrane. Average positions
of the phosphorus (PO4) group and the nitrogen (choline)
atoms of the lipid headgroups are shown as gray and brown dotted lines,
respectively.
Orientation and depth of insertion of CYP3A4 in a full
POPC membrane.
(Top) Time evolution of the heme tilt angle and (bottom) average height
of the center of mass of A-anchor and helices F′ and G′
are shown for CYP3A4 bound to a full POPC membrane. Average positions
of the phosphorus (PO4) group and the nitrogen (choline)
atoms of the lipid headgroups are shown as gray and brown dotted lines,
respectively.In order to characterize
the orientation of CYP3A4 on the membrane,
in addition to the heme tilt angle described above, two additional
orthogonal vectors were defined, similar to the approach employed
in other studies of CYPs in membranes.[29] The time evolution and average values of the angles between these
two vectors and the membrane normal (Table S1 and Figure S2, Supporting Information) further confirm the specific
orientation of CYP3A4 upon binding to the membrane, which in turn
determines the accessibility of the active site.Since the experiments
presented in this work were carried out with
a sequence of CYP3A4 that includes a truncated TM helix, two additional
simulations including a TM helix were performed, with the models prepared
as described under Materials and Methods.
The average heme tilt angle of these membrane simulations (Figure 5), 72.6° for WT-TM and 73.4° for truncated-TM,
suggests that the orientation angle of CYP3A4 is not significantly
affected by the presence of the TM anchor. Whether or not the helix
is there, the tilt angle would not drastically change. The observation
that the heme tilt angle is largely independent of the presence of
the TM helix suggests that the globular domain, not the TM anchor,
is the main determinant of the orientation of the membrane-bound enzyme.
Figure 5
Effect
of the transmembrane helix on the orientation of CYP3A4.
(Top) Initial configuration of the two simulated systems including
a transmembrane helix. (Bottom) Time evolution of the heme tilt angle
for the simulations including the transmembrane helix. The average
heme tilt angle for the WT-TM system is 72.6° ± 5.1°
and for truncated-TM is 73.4° ± 4.2°.
Effect
of the transmembrane helix on the orientation of CYP3A4.
(Top) Initial configuration of the two simulated systems including
a transmembrane helix. (Bottom) Time evolution of the heme tilt angle
for the simulations including the transmembrane helix. The average
heme tilt angle for the WT-TM system is 72.6° ± 5.1°
and for truncated-TM is 73.4° ± 4.2°.
Membrane-Induced Conformational Changes of
CYP3A4
Despite
the large number of crystallographic structures available for CYP3A4,
no structural information for its membrane-bound state at an atomic
level is available. This is particularly critical since the structure
of CYP3A4 might be affected by the membrane, and the potential membrane-induced
conformational changes could have a direct impact on the access of
substrates, especially large molecules, to the active site, an aspect
that is unclear from the crystal structures. Binding of CYP3A4 to
the membrane does not induce any global conformational changes in
the enzyme within the simulated time, as measured by the backbone
root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) with respect to the X-ray structure,
which shows values <2.5 Å (Figure S3, Supporting Information). The RMSD of the membrane-bound CYP3A4
does not deviate significantly from that of the aqueous simulation
of CYP3A4 either, suggesting that the overall fold of the enzyme is
likely preserved upon binding to the membrane, in agreement with the
reported behavior of the CYP2C9 isoform when bound to a conventional
membrane in a previous MD study.[28,29] However, significant
local conformational changes at the membrane interface accompany the
process of membrane binding of the enzyme. These conformational changes,
which are mostly localized to the membrane–protein interface,
likely arise due to close interaction of specific residues and/or
regions of CYP3A4 with lipid molecules in the membrane, in particular
helices F′ and G′ and A-anchor (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Such specific lipid–protein
interactions might disrupt interactions with residues located in other
regions of the enzyme, for example, interactions with residues of
the BC loop, which is in close proximity to helix G′, or interactions
between the β1 sheet and helix F′. While the globally
low RMSD appears to suggest that CYP3A4 remains in a nearly closed
conformation in its membrane-bound form, side-chain fluctuations due
to interaction with the lipids directly affect the opening and closing
of access tunnels leading to the active site of the enzyme.
Membrane-Induced
Modulation of Access Tunnels
For other
humanCYP isoforms, it has been suggested that access of lipophilic
substrates to the active site is primarily through the membrane, while
egress of products occurs through solvent-accessible tunnels.[4,24,52] In our simulations, the interaction
of CYP3A4 with the membrane induces local changes that promote the
opening of access tunnels leading to the active site of the enzyme
(Figure 6). These tunnels correspond to the
2a, 2b, 2e, 3, and solvent (S) tunnels, named after their lining secondary
structures according to the nomenclature established in ref (2). The tunnels were observed
to start to open to different degrees during the membrane binding
simulations. Interestingly, tunnels 2a and 3 are delimited by regions
of CYP3A4 that are in close contact with the membrane (Table S2, Supporting Information); for example, tunnel
2a is located between β1 sheet and the F–F′ loop,
close to A-anchor, and tunnel 3 is located within the F-G loop, surrounded
by helices F′ and G′.
Figure 6
Membrane-induced rearrangement of the
access tunnels. (Top) Access
tunnels that were observed to be opening during simulations. Two views,
rotated by 120°, are presented, showing the side (left) and bottom
(right) of the protein and the location of the access tunnels leading
to the active site. (Middle) Percentage of frames from the membrane
binding (Mem-1 to Mem-5) and solution trajectories in which the access
tunnels to the active site were opening. (Bottom) Time evolution of
the smallest (bottleneck) radius along each access tunnel during the
simulations. A tunnel is considered to be opening when its bottleneck
radius is ≥1.2 Å.
Membrane-induced rearrangement of the
access tunnels. (Top) Access
tunnels that were observed to be opening during simulations. Two views,
rotated by 120°, are presented, showing the side (left) and bottom
(right) of the protein and the location of the access tunnels leading
to the active site. (Middle) Percentage of frames from the membrane
binding (Mem-1 to Mem-5) and solution trajectories in which the access
tunnels to the active site were opening. (Bottom) Time evolution of
the smallest (bottleneck) radius along each access tunnel during the
simulations. A tunnel is considered to be opening when its bottleneck
radius is ≥1.2 Å.The identified access tunnels open to varying degrees in
each simulation
(Figure 6). The data were collected from the
last 40 ns of each simulation (i.e., for membrane-bound CYP3A4). Tunnels
2b and 2e are predominantly more open than other tunnels during the
simulations. Furthermore, the solution simulation of CYP3A4 reveals
that these tunnels are open to a lesser extent in the absence of the
membrane. The interaction of CYP3A4 with the membrane not only promotes
the opening of those tunnels already identified from the crystal structures[15,16] but also induces the opening of additional tunnels. It should be
noted that these opening events are not observed in the solution simulation
of the enzyme. We also note that although these openings are significant,
we do not believe that we have been able to capture the complete process
and the ultimate “open” configuration of the tunnels,
since they are still too small for accommodating such large substrates
as those metabolized by CYP3A4. Although the HMMM model allows for
increased lateral diffusion of the lipids in our simulations, the
internal degrees of freedom of the protein governing the opening of
the access tunnels still follow the unaccelerated and therefore slow
protein dynamics. Therefore, it is highly likely that we have not
been able to capture the full opening of the access tunnels and the
formation of their fully open states.The opening of the tunnels
facing the membrane is of particular
importance in the recruitment of lipophilic substrates directly from
the membrane into the active site.[24,28,29] In our simulations, access tunnels 2a, 3, and S are
observed to open to varying degrees and are found to be facing the
lipid layer in the membrane-bound form of CYP3A4. The lipophilic substrate
transport hypothesis is particularly relevant for tunnel 3, since
it is formed only after membrane binding of the enzyme, with opening
observed in at least 20% of the snapshots in systems Mem-2 and Mem-3.
In the membrane binding simulations, tunnels 2b and 2e open after
binding to the membrane, and they remain open for most of the simulation
time (Figure 6), whereas in the aqueous simulation
these tunnels start to open only sporadically. Access tunnel 3 opens
after binding to the membrane in systems Mem-2 and Mem-3, where the
opening occurs approximately at t = 25 and 40 ns,
respectively (Figure 6). The opening of tunnel 3 is related to the motion of the side chain
of Phe-219 located in helix F′, favoring the opening of this
tunnel when pointing toward the membrane. The entrance of this tunnel
is defined by residues Phe-213 and Phe-220, which together with Phe-108,
Phe-219, Phe-241, and Phe-304 form a Phe cluster in the absence of
the membrane (Figure 7), a distinctive region
of CYP3A4 that has been suggested to serve as a substrate recognition
mechanism[15,53] and that has been observed to serve as a
peripheral binding site for progesterone, through residues Phe-219
and Phe-220.[15] Access tunnel S is observed
to open to various degrees after membrane binding, except for system
Mem-5 (Figure 6). The opening of this tunnel
seems to be coupled to the motion of Arg-212, a residue that has been
recently reported to assist the binding of ligands to the active site.[18,19] It has been suggested that tunnel S might function as a ligand egress
path in other CYPs[4,52] as well as in CYP3A4 in water.[24] Available crystal structures indicate that in
order to accommodate large compounds in the active site of CYP3A4,
such as ritonavir,[18] two ketoconazole molecules,
or erythromycin,[12] rearrangement of the
F-G region, in particular between helices F and F′, is necessary,
suggesting that this is a very flexible region (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Although we do not observe
a dramatic backbone motion in this region in our simulations (Figure
S5, Supporting Information), the side-chain
motion of the residues located in this region, including the Phe cluster,
is promoted in the presence of the membrane.
Figure 7
Membrane-induced rearrangement
of the Phe cluster of CYP3A4: side
view of the Phe cluster of CYP3A4 in the crystal structure (left)
and in the membrane-bound form (system Mem-2) (right). The dashed
line represents the approximate location of the membrane surface.
The side chains of Phe-108, Phe-213, and Phe-220, involved in tunnel
gating, are shown in red stick representation. The side chain of Phe-219
is shown in gray stick representation. During the process of membrane
binding, the side chain of Phe-219 is observed to change its orientation
toward the membrane, and the Phe cluster starts to break.
Membrane-induced rearrangement
of the Phe cluster of CYP3A4: side
view of the Phe cluster of CYP3A4 in the crystal structure (left)
and in the membrane-bound form (system Mem-2) (right). The dashed
line represents the approximate location of the membrane surface.
The side chains of Phe-108, Phe-213, and Phe-220, involved in tunnel
gating, are shown in red stick representation. The side chain of Phe-219
is shown in gray stick representation. During the process of membrane
binding, the side chain of Phe-219 is observed to change its orientation
toward the membrane, and the Phe cluster starts to break.The radius of the observed access tunnels is small
for the average
size of the substrates of the enzyme, indicating that further changes
are needed in order for the substrates to be able to gain access to
the active site. The interaction with the membrane might represent
only the first step in formation of substrate access pathways to the
active site. Although the binding of small ligands to the active site
does not require major conformational changes over the enzyme,[15,18] it has been observed that the binding of larger compounds accompanies
a significant effect in the conformation of the F-G region of CYP3A4,[12,17,19] including helices F′ and
G′ that are in direct contact with the membrane in membrane-bound
CYP3A4. These conformational changes induced by the ligand, together
with the interaction between the enzyme and the lipids observed in
our simulations, suggest that the size of the tunnels leading to the
active site could further increase to allow a lipophilic substrate
into the active site.
Conclusion
CYP3A4, a membrane-associated
isoform of the cytochrome P450 family,
is the most common metabolizing enzyme in the human body for biotransformation
of a large number of pharmaceutical compounds and toxic xenobiotics
and a major site for biosynthesis of various endogenous compounds.
Given the fact that a large fraction of compounds metabolized by the
enzyme primarily partition in the membrane, characterizing the membrane-bound
form of the enzyme is key to our understanding of its mechanism and
spectrum, yet this has proven an extremely challenging task given
the difficulties associated with high-resolution structural determination
of the membrane-associated state of peripheral membrane proteins.
In the present study, employing a concerted experimental and simulation
approach, we have developed a structural model for the membrane-bound
state of CYP3A4. Spontaneous membrane binding and insertion of the
globular domain of CYP3A4, independent of the transmembrane helix
of the protein, have been successfully captured in multiple independent,
unbiased simulations by taking advantage of a novel membrane representation
(HMMM) with enhanced lipid diffusion that allows for more efficient
description and sampling of membrane-associated phenomena without
compromising atomic details.The simulations resulted in a convergent
model for the membrane-bound
state of CYP3A4, characterized by the depth of insertion and orientation
of the globular domain on the surface of the membrane. These results
indicate that CYP3A4 does not interact with the membrane merely through
nonspecific contacts and adsorption to the surface but rather through
specific lipid–protein interactions that closely control the
pose of the protein on the surface of the membrane. The protein is
anchored into the membrane primarily through a hydrophobic anchor
located between helices A″ and A, which inserts deeply into
the membrane, and helix G′, which partitions mainly within
the headgroup region. In parallel to the simulations, experimental
linear dichroism measurements of CYP3A4 bound to POPC Nanodiscs have
been used to determine the orientation of the globular domain of CYP3A4
with regard to the membrane. These measurements also demonstrate a
specific orientation of the globular domain of the enzyme in its membrane-bound
form, as opposed to nonspecific adhesion to the lipid bilayer. Remarkably,
the heme tilt angles obtained from the simulations and the experiments
are in close agreement, which further verifies the validity of the
structural model resulting from the simulations. Moreover, the resulting
model was further tested by use of simulations performed in a full
membrane environment, during which the insertion depth and orientation
of the protein on the membrane were largely preserved.We show
that membrane binding of CYP3A4 has significant structural
and dynamical impacts on its globular domain at the membrane interface.
The presence of the membrane induces local side-chain fluctuations
that initiates the opening of access tunnels to the active site that
are not observed in the crystal structures or in solution simulations,
suggesting that binding to the membrane might play a role in efficient
recruitment of lipophilic ligands from the membrane to the active
site. In particular, rearrangement of a Phe cluster induced by the
membrane is found to be among the structural changes that are directly
coupled to modulation of the access tunnels leading to the active
site. These attributes are of direct relevance to the mechanism and
pathway for recruitment and binding of amphiphilic substrates, including
both endogenous and drug molecules, directly from the membrane into
the active site of the enzyme.
Authors: Christopher G Mayne; Mark J Arcario; Paween Mahinthichaichan; Javier L Baylon; Josh V Vermaas; Latifeh Navidpour; Po-Chao Wen; Sundarapandian Thangapandian; Emad Tajkhorshid Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2016-05-06
Authors: Josh V Vermaas; Javier L Baylon; Mark J Arcario; Melanie P Muller; Zhe Wu; Taras V Pogorelov; Emad Tajkhorshid Journal: J Membr Biol Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 1.843
Authors: Elke Prade; Mukesh Mahajan; Sang-Choul Im; Meng Zhang; Katherine A Gentry; G M Anantharamaiah; Lucy Waskell; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 15.336