Literature DB >> 23696076

High intratumor genetic heterogeneity is related to worse outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Edmund A Mroz1, Aaron D Tward, Curtis R Pickering, Jeffrey N Myers, Robert L Ferris, James W Rocco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the presence of genetic heterogeneity within the tumors of individual patients is established, it is unclear whether greater heterogeneity predicts a worse outcome. A quantitative measure of genetic heterogeneity based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH), was previously developed and applied to a data set on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Whether this measure correlates with clinical outcome was not previously assessed.
METHODS: The authors examined the association between MATH and clinical, pathologic, and overall survival data for 74 patients with HNSCC for whom exome sequencing was completed.
RESULTS: High MATH (a MATH value above the median) was found to be significantly associated with shorter overall survival (hazards ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.8). MATH was similarly found to be associated with adverse outcomes in clinically high-risk patients with an advanced stage of disease, and in those with tumors classified as high risk on the basis of validated biomarkers including those that were negative for human papillomavirus or having disruptive tumor protein p53 mutations. In patients who received chemotherapy, the hazards ratio for high MATH was 4.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.6-10.2).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel measure of tumor genetic heterogeneity is significantly associated with tumor progression and adverse treatment outcomes, thereby supporting the hypothesis that higher genetic heterogeneity portends a worse clinical outcome in patients with HNSCC. The prognostic value of some known biomarkers may be the result of their association with high genetic heterogeneity. MATH provides a useful measure of that heterogeneity to be prospectively validated as NGS data from homogeneously treated patient cohorts become available.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck cancer; intratumor genetic heterogeneity; next-generation DNA sequencing; overall survival; somatic mutations; tumor biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696076      PMCID: PMC3735618          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  On the presence within tumours of clones that differ in sensitivity to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  L Håkansson; C Tropé
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A       Date:  1974-01

2.  Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Clonal evolution in cancer.

Authors:  Mel Greaves; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Jude Kendall; Jennifer Troge; Peter Andrews; Linda Rodgers; Jeanne McIndoo; Kerry Cook; Asya Stepansky; Dan Levy; Diane Esposito; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; Alex Krasnitz; W Richard McCombie; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft.

Authors:  Li Ding; Matthew J Ellis; Shunqiang Li; David E Larson; Ken Chen; John W Wallis; Christopher C Harris; Michael D McLellan; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Rachel M Abbott; Jeremy Hoog; David J Dooling; Daniel C Koboldt; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki; Qunyuan Zhang; Lei Chen; Ling Lin; Michael C Wendl; Joshua F McMichael; Vincent J Magrini; Lisa Cook; Sean D McGrath; Tammi L Vickery; Elizabeth Appelbaum; Katherine Deschryver; Sherri Davies; Therese Guintoli; Li Lin; Robert Crowder; Yu Tao; Jacqueline E Snider; Scott M Smith; Adam F Dukes; Gabriel E Sanderson; Craig S Pohl; Kim D Delehaunty; Catrina C Fronick; Kimberley A Pape; Jerry S Reed; Jody S Robinson; Jennifer S Hodges; William Schierding; Nathan D Dees; Dong Shen; Devin P Locke; Madeline E Wiechert; James M Eldred; Josh B Peck; Benjamin J Oberkfell; Justin T Lolofie; Feiyu Du; Amy E Hawkins; Michelle D O'Laughlin; Kelly E Bernard; Mark Cunningham; Glendoria Elliott; Mark D Mason; Dominic M Thompson; Jennifer L Ivanovich; Paul J Goodfellow; Charles M Perou; George M Weinstock; Rebecca Aft; Mark Watson; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Wylie Burke; Isaac Kohane; Sharon E Plon; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  MATH, a novel measure of intratumor genetic heterogeneity, is high in poor-outcome classes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Edmund A Mroz; James W Rocco
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Carole Fakhry; William H Westra; Sigui Li; Anthony Cmelak; John A Ridge; Harlan Pinto; Arlene Forastiere; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Most multifocal papillary thyroid carcinomas acquire genetic and morphotype diversity through subclonal evolution following the intra-glandular spread of the initial neoplastic clone.

Authors:  L Jovanovic; B Delahunt; B McIver; N L Eberhardt; S K G Grebe
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Tumor heterogeneity in neoplasms of breast, colon, and skin.

Authors:  Jian Li; Kai Wang; Thomas Dyrsø Jensen; Shengting Li; Lars Bolund; Carsten Wiuf
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-11-25
View more
  96 in total

1.  An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival.

Authors:  Cheng Lu; James S Lewis; William D Dupont; W Dale Plummer; Andrew Janowczyk; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Histological intratumoral heterogeneity in pretreatment esophageal cancer biopsies predicts survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the UK MRC OE02 trial.

Authors:  Naser Davarzani; Lindsay C Hewitt; Matthew D Hale; Veerle Melotte; Matthew Nankivell; Gordon G A Hutchins; David Cunningham; William H Allum; Ruth E Langley; Shahab Jolani; Heike I Grabsch
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 3.  The influence of subclonal resistance mutations on targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Michael W Schmitt; Lawrence A Loeb; Jesse J Salk
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Tumor Heterogeneity as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alissa Greenbaum; David R Martin; Thèrése Bocklage; Ji-Hyun Lee; Scott A Ness; Ashwani Rajput
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 5.  Big Bang Tumor Growth and Clonal Evolution.

Authors:  Ruping Sun; Zheng Hu; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 6.  Leukaemia 'firsts' in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Mel Greaves
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Tumor evolution in response to chemotherapy: phenotype versus genotype.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Tumour heterogeneity and metastasis at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Devon A Lawson; Kai Kessenbrock; Ryan T Davis; Nicholas Pervolarakis; Zena Werb
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Functional Subclone Profiling for Prediction of Treatment-Induced Intratumor Population Shifts and Discovery of Rational Drug Combinations in Human Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Roman Reinartz; Shanshan Wang; Sied Kebir; Daniel J Silver; Anja Wieland; Tong Zheng; Marius Küpper; Laurèl Rauschenbach; Rolf Fimmers; Timothy M Shepherd; Daniel Trageser; Andreas Till; Niklas Schäfer; Martin Glas; Axel M Hillmer; Sven Cichon; Amy A Smith; Torsten Pietsch; Ying Liu; Brent A Reynolds; Anthony Yachnis; David W Pincus; Matthias Simon; Oliver Brüstle; Dennis A Steindler; Björn Scheffler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Inference of tumor evolution during chemotherapy by computational modeling and in situ analysis of genetic and phenotypic cellular diversity.

Authors:  Vanessa Almendro; Yu-Kang Cheng; Amanda Randles; Shalev Itzkovitz; Andriy Marusyk; Elisabet Ametller; Xavier Gonzalez-Farre; Montse Muñoz; Hege G Russnes; Aslaug Helland; Inga H Rye; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Reo Maruyama; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Mitchell Dowsett; Robin L Jones; Jorge Reis-Filho; Pere Gascon; Mithat Gönen; Franziska Michor; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.