BACKGROUND: Nonampullary sporadic duodenal adenomas (NSDAs) are uncommon mucosal neoplasms with malignant potential. Recently, endoscopic treatment is used for NSDA with increasing frequency. AIMS: This study therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment for NSDA. METHODS: A total of 36 NSDAs in 35 consecutive patients were endoscopically eradicated at Samsung Medical Center between October 1994 and May 2011. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and endoscopic treatment outcomes were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of all patients, 19 (52.8 %) were male. The mean age was 56.0 ± 12.2 (SD) years. Of the 36 NSDAs, 23 lesions were removed by endoscopic resection (ER) including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, n = 20) and snare polypectomy (n = 3). In the 23 cases treated with ER, en bloc resection was achieved in 20 (87.0 %). All cases undergoing en bloc resection showed tumor-free resection margins. Thirteen lesions were ablated by argon plasma coagulation (APC). During EMR, bleeding occurred in two cases and perforation occurred in one case. One patient bled during APC. All complications were successfully managed with endoscopic treatment without surgical intervention. During a median follow-up period of 11.4 months (range, 1.8-182.4 months), local recurrence occurred in one patient treated with APC (1/10, 10.0 %). Among patients undergoing ER, no local recurrence occurred but one patient treated with EMR experienced metachronous recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment, including EMR, snare polypectomy, and APC, was an effective and safe treatment for NSDA. Further multi-center large prospective studies are warranted to establish appropriate treatment guidelines for NSDA.
BACKGROUND: Nonampullary sporadic duodenal adenomas (NSDAs) are uncommon mucosal neoplasms with malignant potential. Recently, endoscopic treatment is used for NSDA with increasing frequency. AIMS: This study therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment for NSDA. METHODS: A total of 36 NSDAs in 35 consecutive patients were endoscopically eradicated at Samsung Medical Center between October 1994 and May 2011. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and endoscopic treatment outcomes were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of all patients, 19 (52.8 %) were male. The mean age was 56.0 ± 12.2 (SD) years. Of the 36 NSDAs, 23 lesions were removed by endoscopic resection (ER) including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, n = 20) and snare polypectomy (n = 3). In the 23 cases treated with ER, en bloc resection was achieved in 20 (87.0 %). All cases undergoing en bloc resection showed tumor-free resection margins. Thirteen lesions were ablated by argon plasma coagulation (APC). During EMR, bleeding occurred in two cases and perforation occurred in one case. One patient bled during APC. All complications were successfully managed with endoscopic treatment without surgical intervention. During a median follow-up period of 11.4 months (range, 1.8-182.4 months), local recurrence occurred in one patient treated with APC (1/10, 10.0 %). Among patients undergoing ER, no local recurrence occurred but one patient treated with EMR experienced metachronous recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment, including EMR, snare polypectomy, and APC, was an effective and safe treatment for NSDA. Further multi-center large prospective studies are warranted to establish appropriate treatment guidelines for NSDA.
Authors: Douglas G Adler; Waqar Qureshi; Raquel Davila; S Ian Gan; David Lichtenstein; Elizabeth Rajan; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Robert D Fanelli; Trina Van Guilder; Todd H Baron Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: J M Jepsen; M Persson; N O Jakobsen; T Christiansen; E Skoubo-Kristensen; P Funch-Jensen; A Kruse; P Thommesen Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; William B Long; Emma E Furth; Gregory G Ginsberg Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Sina Alexander; Michael J Bourke; Stephen J Williams; Adam Bailey; Jonard Co Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Raf Bisschops; Miguel Areia; Emmanuel Coron; Daniela Dobru; Bernd Kaskas; Roman Kuvaev; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas Weusten; Pietro Familiari; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Michal F Kaminski; Cristiano Spada; Michael Bretthauer; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-08-21 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Stephanie Downs-Canner; Wald J Van der Vliet; Stijn J J Thoolen; Brian A Boone; Amer H Zureikat; Melissa E Hogg; David L Bartlett; Mark P Callery; Tara S Kent; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michael J Bartel; Ruchir Puri; Bhaumik Brahmbhatt; Wei-Chung Chen; Daniel Kim; Carlos Roberto Simons-Linares; John A Stauffer; Mauricia A Buchanan; Steven P Bowers; Timothy A Woodward; Michael B Wallace; Massimo Raimondo; Horacio J Asbun Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.584