Literature DB >> 23695612

Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth.

Camillo D'Arcangelo1, Maciej Zarow, Francesco De Angelis, Mirco Vadini, Michele Paolantonio, Mario Giannoni, Maurizio D'Amario.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of indirect composite onlays-overlays bonded with a light-cured composite on vital molars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were restored with 79 indirect composite restorations. The restorations were studied for an observation time of 5 years. Marginal adaptation, marginal discolouration, secondary caries, colour match and anatomic form were clinically examined following modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Each restoration was also examined for fractures and debonding. Endodontic complications were registered. Survival rate, based just on failures that required a replacement, and success rate that included also failures that required a repair intervention were statistically determined using a restoration and a patient-related analysis.
RESULTS: After 5 years, using each restoration as a statistical unit, the survival rate was 91.1% and the success rate 84.8%, with a high Kaplan-Meier estimated success probability of 0.852. Using the patient as the statistical unit, the survival rate was 90.2% and the success rate 85.4%, corresponding to a Kaplan-Meier estimated success probability of 0.857. On the basis of the criteria used, most of the restorations rated Alpha. Regarding marginal adaptation and marginal discolouration, 5 and 10.1% of the restorations, respectively, revealed Bravo ratings
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect composite restorations offer a predictable and successful treatment modality giving an optimal preservation of sound tooth tissue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The preparation, cementation and finishing procedures are considered key factors for the long-term success of the indirect composite restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23695612     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1001-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  37 in total

Review 1.  Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports.

Authors:  I A Mjör; F Toffenetti
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.677

Review 2.  Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials.

Authors:  W Geurtsen
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  2000

3.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto; Paulo Sérgio Quagliatto; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Christian F J Stappert
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam--results up to 6 years.

Authors:  J F Roulet
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief.

Authors:  R M Carvalho; J C Pereira; M Yoshiyama; D H Pashley
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  Influence of Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser surface treatment on microtensile bond strength of indirect resin composites to resin cement. Lasers surface treatment of indirect resin composites.

Authors:  T M F Caneppele; A C Oliveira de Souza; G R Batista; A B Borges; C R G Torres
Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent       Date:  2012-09

9.  Surface treatment of indirect resin composite surfaces before cementation.

Authors:  S K Hummel; V Marker; L Pace; M Goldfogle
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites.

Authors:  D C Crumpler; S C Bayne; S Sockwell; D Brunson; T M Roberson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  8 in total

1.  Direct and semi-direct resin composite restoration in large cavity preparations: analysis of dentin bond strength stability and bottom/top microhardness ratio in a cavity model.

Authors:  Andressa Eveline de Lima Ribeiro; Joselúcia da Nóbrega Dias; Ana Margarida Dos Santos Melo; Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges; Isauremi Vieira de Assunção
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.885

2.  Dentin anti-demineralization potential of surface reaction-type pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler containing self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  SoeKayThwe ThanNaing; Ahmed Abdou; Mahmoud Sayed; Yasunori Sumi; Junji Tagami; Noriko Hiraishi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Digital planning of composite customized veneers using Digital Smile Design: Evaluation of its accuracy and manufacturing.

Authors:  Luca Ortensi; Giancarlo Sigari; Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa; Agnese Ferri; Francesco Grande; Eugenio Pedullà
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 4.  Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review.

Authors:  Grace De Souza; Roberto Ruggiero Braga; Paulo Francisco Cesar; Guilherme Carpena Lopes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Microleakage of two self-adhesive cements in the enamel and dentin after 24 hours and two months.

Authors:  Zahra Jaberi Ansari; Mojdeh Kalantar Motamedi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-07-31

6.  Mechanical Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Comparison.

Authors:  Dino Re; Francesco De Angelis; Gabriele Augusti; Davide Augusti; Sergio Caputi; Maurizio D'Amario; Camillo D'Arcangelo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-11-26

7.  Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Félix Mañes-Ferrer; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ján Staněk; Abanoub Riad; Adam Le; Matěj Bernát; Milad Hammal; Basel Azar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.