Literature DB >> 11021634

Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials.

W Geurtsen1.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of resin-based dental restorations have been placed over the past decade. During this same period, the public interest in the local and especially systemic adverse effects caused by dental materials has increased significantly. It has been found that each resin-based material releases several components into the oral environment. In particular, the comonomer, triethyleneglycol di-methacrylate (TEGDMA), and the 'hydrophilic' monomer, 2-hydroxy-ethyl-methacrylate (HEMA), are leached out from various composite resins and 'adhesive' materials (e.g., resin-modified glass-ionomer cements [GICs] and dentin adhesives) in considerable amounts during the first 24 hours after polymerization. Numerous unbound resin components may leach into saliva during the initial phase after polymerization, and later, due to degradation or erosion of the resinous restoration. Those substances may be systemically distributed and could potentially cause adverse systemic effects in patients. In addition, absorption of organic substances from unpolymerized material, through unprotected skin, due to manual contact may pose a special risk for dental personnel. This is borne out by the increasing numbers of dental nurses, technicians, and dentists who present with allergic reactions to one or more resin components, like HEMA, glutaraldehyde, ethyleneglycol di-methacrylate (EGDMA), and dibenzoyl peroxide (DPO). However, it must be emphasized that, except for conventional composite resins, data reported on the release of substances from resin-based materials are scarce. There is very little reliable information with respect to the biological interactions between resin components and various tissues. Those interactions may be either protective, like absorption to dentin, or detrimental, e.g., inflammatory reactions of soft tissues. Microbial effects have also been observed which may contribute indirectly to caries and irritation of the pulp. Therefore, it is critical, both for our patients and for the profession, that the biological effects of resin-based filling materials be clarified in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021634     DOI: 10.1177/10454411000110030401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med        ISSN: 1045-4411


  64 in total

Review 1.  All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing?

Authors:  Peter Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Investigation on synthesis and properties of isosorbide based bis-GMA analogue.

Authors:  Jan Łukaszczyk; Bartosz Janicki; Achim Frick
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Resin-modified glass-ionomer setting reaction competition.

Authors:  D W Berzins; S Abey; M C Costache; C A Wilkie; H W Roberts
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Can interaction of materials with the dentin-pulp complex contribute to dentin regeneration?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane; Paul R Cooper; Anthony J Smith
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  In vitro studies on the cytotoxic potential of surface sealants.

Authors:  S Zingler; B Matthei; A Kohl; D Saure; B Ludwig; K Diercke; C J Lux; R Erber
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Effects of two low-shrinkage composites on dental stem cells (viability, cell damaged or apoptosis and mesenchymal markers expression).

Authors:  F J Rodríguez-Lozano; I Serrano-Belmonte; J C Pérez Calvo; M T Coronado-Parra; A Bernabeu-Esclapez; J M Moraleda
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 7.  Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update.

Authors:  Payal Saxena; Saurabh Kumar Gupta; Vilas Newaskar
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-08-23

8.  Translationally controlled tumor protein against apoptosis from 2-hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate in human dental pulp cells.

Authors:  Nattaporn Wanachottrakul; Wilaiwan Chotigeat; Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Hydrophilicity of dentin bonding systems influences in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation.

Authors:  Eugenio Brambilla; Andrei Ionescu; Annalisa Mazzoni; Milena Cadenaro; Massimo Gagliani; Monica Ferraroni; Franklin Tay; David Pashley; Lorenzo Breschi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Design and development of self-healing dental composites.

Authors:  George Huyang; Anne E Debertin; Jirun Sun
Journal:  Mater Des       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 7.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.