Literature DB >> 2700978

Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites.

D C Crumpler, S C Bayne, S Sockwell, D Brunson, T M Roberson.   

Abstract

Despite significant improvements in the wear resistance of posterior composite restorations, they still undergo occlusal wear, color change, and surface staining with time. One method of repairing these restorations is re-surfacing the old composite. This study investigated the bonding of new composite to the corresponding old composite material by several different mechanical conditioning steps, chemical conditioning steps, primer conditioning steps, and four posterior composites. Aged composite surfaces were conditioned, re-bonded to new composite, stored in artificial saliva for seven days at 37 degrees C, and tested in shear. The mean shear strength for unrepaired composites was 27 MPa. Optimal re-bond strengths were 88% (Estilux), 77% (Ful-Fil), 92% (Occlusin), and 102% (P-10) of original bulk shear strengths. General linear modeling revealed that the best combination tested was roughening with a D830 diamond bur, conditioning the surface with water, and priming with Scotchbond-1 dentin bonding agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2700978     DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  9 in total

1.  Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites.

Authors:  M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos; Santiago González-López
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength.

Authors:  Andreas Rathke; Yana Tymina; Bernd Haller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Microtensile Repair Bond Strength of a Composite After Accelerated Artificial Aging: Effect of the Air Abrasion, Bur, Er:YAG Laser, Two-Step Self-etch Bonding, and Universal Bonding Repair System.

Authors:  Marie Rashidi; Simin Berangi; Nasim Chiniforush; Elham Ahmadi; Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Effect of resin application time on bond strength of polymer substrate repaired with particulate filler composite.

Authors:  T T Kallio; T M Lastumäki; P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth.

Authors:  Camillo D'Arcangelo; Maciej Zarow; Francesco De Angelis; Mirco Vadini; Michele Paolantonio; Mario Giannoni; Maurizio D'Amario
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Composite Restorations Using Universal Adhesive.

Authors:  Soodeh Tahmasbi; Mohammadreza Badiee; Maryam Modarresi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-06

7.  Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  M Hemadri; G Saritha; V Rajasekhar; K Amit Pachlag; R Purushotham; Veera Kishore Kumar Reddy
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

8.  The effect of surface roughness on repair bond strength of light-curing composite resin to polymer composite substrate.

Authors:  Timo T Kallio; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Ahmadizenouz; Behnaz Esmaeili; Arnica Taghvaei; Zahra Jamali; Toloo Jafari; Farshid Amiri Daneshvar; Soraya Khafri
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.