BACKGROUND: Age-related olfactory loss (presbyosmia) substantially decreases quality of life, presages neurodegenerative disease, impairs nutrition, and predicts mortality. We sought to determine how race is associated with olfactory loss in older American adults in order to inform both health care and policy. METHODS: The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project interviewed a cross-sectional nationally representative probability sample of older adults in the United States. African Americans and Hispanics were oversampled, providing power to detect disparities for these subgroups. As part of an omnibus survey of demographic, social, psychological, and biological measures, National Social Life, Health and Aging Project assessed the ability to verbally identify odors by presenting five odor pens. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression quantified racial differences in odor identification, and then tested potential confounders. RESULTS: African Americans and Hispanics had markedly worse olfactory function (controlling for gender and age) compared with whites (p < .001), twice the magnitude of gender differences, and comparable to aging 9 years. Cognition, household assets, and education accounted for the disparity found among Hispanics but not among African Americans. Moreover, other potential confounders, such as physical or mental health, including tobacco and alcohol use, did not account for the African American health disparity, which remained significant (p = .001) after including these factors. CONCLUSIONS: African Americans are more likely to suffer from presbyosmia, a health disparity not explained by gender, education, cognition, physical or mental health, and health behaviors. This novel health disparity may result from lifetime environmental exposures, diet, or genetic susceptibility. Dissecting the interactions among these putative mechanisms will provide insight into ameliorating this decline in critical human sensory function.
BACKGROUND: Age-related olfactory loss (presbyosmia) substantially decreases quality of life, presages neurodegenerative disease, impairs nutrition, and predicts mortality. We sought to determine how race is associated with olfactory loss in older American adults in order to inform both health care and policy. METHODS: The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project interviewed a cross-sectional nationally representative probability sample of older adults in the United States. African Americans and Hispanics were oversampled, providing power to detect disparities for these subgroups. As part of an omnibus survey of demographic, social, psychological, and biological measures, National Social Life, Health and Aging Project assessed the ability to verbally identify odors by presenting five odor pens. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression quantified racial differences in odor identification, and then tested potential confounders. RESULTS: African Americans and Hispanics had markedly worse olfactory function (controlling for gender and age) compared with whites (p < .001), twice the magnitude of gender differences, and comparable to aging 9 years. Cognition, household assets, and education accounted for the disparity found among Hispanics but not among African Americans. Moreover, other potential confounders, such as physical or mental health, including tobacco and alcohol use, did not account for the African American health disparity, which remained significant (p = .001) after including these factors. CONCLUSIONS: African Americans are more likely to suffer from presbyosmia, a health disparity not explained by gender, education, cognition, physical or mental health, and health behaviors. This novel health disparity may result from lifetime environmental exposures, diet, or genetic susceptibility. Dissecting the interactions among these putative mechanisms will provide insight into ameliorating this decline in critical human sensory function.
Authors: Jayant M Pinto; David W Kern; Kristen E Wroblewski; Rachel C Chen; L Philip Schumm; Martha K McClintock Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: David W Kern; Kristen E Wroblewski; L Philip Schumm; Jayant M Pinto; Rachel C Chen; Martha K McClintock Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Johnny Jarnagin; Yorghos Tripodis; Michael Platt; Brett Martin; Christine E Chaisson; Christine M Baugh; Nathan G Fritts; Robert C Cantu; Robert A Stern Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Jesse K Siegel; Kristen E Wroblewski; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Jing Dong; Annah Wyss; Jingyun Yang; T Ryan Price; Aude Nicolas; Michael Nalls; Greg Tranah; Nora Franceschini; Zongli Xu; Claudia Schulte; Alvaro Alonso; Steven R Cummings; Myriam Fornage; Dmitri Zaykin; Leping Li; Xuemei Huang; Stephen Kritchevsky; Yongmei Liu; Thomas Gasser; Robert S Wilson; Philip L De Jager; Andrew B Singleton; Jayant M Pinto; Tamara Harris; Thomas H Mosley; David A Bennett; Stephanie London; Lei Yu; Honglei Chen Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Eli P Darnell; Kristen E Wroblewski; Kristina L Pagel; David W Kern; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Gaurav S Ajmani; Helen H Suh; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; L Philip Schumm; Martha K McClintock; Jeff D Yanosky; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Dara R Adams; Gaurav S Ajmani; Vivian C Pun; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; L Philip Schumm; Martha K McClintock; Helen H Suh; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Jayant M Pinto; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; L Philip Schumm; Martha K McClintock Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 6.053