PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified. SETTING: Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Evaluation of a technique. METHODS: Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and -5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers). RESULTS: A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified. SETTING: Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Evaluation of a technique. METHODS:Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and -5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers). RESULTS: A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Authors: Fidel Vega; Maria S Millán; Nuria Garzón; Irene Altemir; Francisco Poyales; Jose Manuel Larrosa Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-Gonzalez; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Elizabeth M Law; Hetal D Buckhurst; Rajesh K Aggarwal; Hosam El-Kasaby; Jonathan Marsden; Gary L Shum; Phillip J Buckhurst Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 3.992