| Literature DB >> 23687506 |
Joakim Hertze1, Sebastian Palmqvist, Lennart Minthon, Oskar Hansson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: White matter lesions (WMLs) are a common finding in patients with dementia. This study investigates the relationship between WMLs, hyperphosphorylated tau (P-tau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype in prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Cerebrospinal fluid; Dementia; Follow-up studies; White matter lesions
Year: 2013 PMID: 23687506 PMCID: PMC3656673 DOI: 10.1159/000348353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra ISSN: 1664-5464
Demograpic data, with CSF levels of P-tau and WML assessments
| Controls | Stable MCI | Prodromal AD | MCI-other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females/males | 27/11 | 39/36 | 40/18 | 10/16 |
| Age, years | 77 ± 8 | 69 ± 7 | 76 ± 7 | 73 ± 7 |
| Carrier of APOE ε4 | 10 (26) | 33 (44) | 44 (76) | 12 (46) |
| MMSE score at baseline | 28.3 ± 1.8 | 28.2 ± 1.3 | 26.1 ± 1.6 | 27.0 ± 1.9 |
| CSF P-tau, ng/ml | 31 ± 17 | 30 ± 15 | 52 ± 22 | 30 ± 12 |
| CSF tau, ng/ml | 91 ± 49 | 80 ± 48 | 141 ± 68 | 80 ± 38 |
| CSF Aβ, ng/ml | 265 ± 74 | 252 ± 61 | 154 ± 55 | 226 ± 77 |
| Left frontal WMLs | 0.34 ± 0.63 | 0.36 ± 0.63 | 0.62 ± 0.77 | 0.96 ± 1.1 |
| Right frontal WMLs | 0.29 ± 0.52 | 0.39 ± 0.72 | 0.59 ± 0.75 | 0.96 ± 1.1 |
| Left parietal WMLs | 0.21 ± 0.62 | 0.31 ± 0.66 | 0.53 ± 0.75 | 0.88 ± 1.2 |
| Right parietal WMLs | 0.32 ± 0.62 | 0.29 ± 0.63 | 0.59 ± 0.82 | 0.96 ± 1.1 |
| Sum frontal WMLs | 0.63 ± 1.2 | 0.75 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 1.5 | 1.9 ± 2.1 |
| Sum parietal WMLs | 0.53 ± 1.2 | 0.6 ± 1.3 | 1.1 ± 1.5 | 1.8 ± 2.3 |
| Total sum frontoparietal WMLs | 1.2 ± 2.0 | 1.3 ± 2.4 | 2.3 ± 2.7 | 3.8 ± 4.0 |
| Left basal ganglia infarcts | 0.08 ± 0.27 | 0.16 ± 0.37 | 0.17 ± 0.48 | 0.58 ± 0.81 |
| Right basal ganglia infarcts | 0.05 ± 0.23 | 0.18 ± 0.51 | 0.26 ± 0.58 | 0.19 ± 0.40 |
| Sum basal ganglia infarcts | 0.13 ± 0.34 | 0.34 ± 0.73 | 0.45 ± 0.88 | 0.77 ± 0.95 |
| Total sum WMLs (including BG) | 1.3 ± 2.0 | 1.6 ± 2.7 | 2.8 ± 3.0 | 4.5 ± 4.4 |
Data are means ± SD or number (%). Stable MCI = MCI patients with stable cognitive functions during a follow-up period of 3.0 – 9.6 years; prodromal AD = MCI patients who developed AD during follow-up; WML = white matter lesions in subcortical brain matter; BG = basal ganglia.
p < 0.05
p < 0.005 vs. controls
p < 0.05
p < 0.005 stable MCI
p < 0.05,
p < 0.005 vs. MCI-other. Correction for multiple analyses has not been performed.
Fig. 1CSF levels of P-tau in prodromal AD patients with or without WMLs. The P-tau levels are significantly lower in patients with WMLs in the parietal lobes (a), but not in patients with WMLs in the frontal lobes (b) or in patients with infarctions in the basal ganglia (c). Error bars represent ± 1 SE.
Fig. 2a There are significantly more WMLs in the parietal lobes, shown as a mean sum, in prodromal AD patients without pathological levels of P-tau, defined as P-tau >51 ng/l. b There are also more WMLs in the parietal lobes in patients carrying no APOE ε4 allele. Error bars represent ± 1 SE.
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rate of progression to AD in subjects with MCI in relation to the levels of CSF P-tau and/or presence of WMLs in the parietal lobes at baseline. MCI cases with both pathological levels of P-tau and/or WMLs in the parietal lobes at baseline progress more rapidly towards AD. One individual was removed from this analysis due to missing data regarding levels of P-tau.
Cox proportional hazards regression models examining the relation between baseline P-tau and WMLs, and the risk of converting to AD in patients with MCI
| Unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Normal P-tau and no parietal WMLs | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Normal P-tau and presence of parietal WMLs | 3.2 (1.5–6.6) | 2.3 (1.1–4.8) |
| Pathological P-tau and no parietal WMLs | 7.0 (3.4–14.3) | 4.9 (2.4–10.2) |
| Both pathological P-tau and presence of parietal WMLs | 10.3 (4.0–26.4) | 6.6 (2.5–17.6) |
All data were collected at baseline.
p < 0.05
p = 0.002
p < 0.0001.
Adjusted (if applicable) for the baseline demographic variables: age, sex and APOE ε4 carrier status.