Literature DB >> 23686686

Use of fecal immunochemical tests in the Iowa Research Network.

Jeanette M Daly1, Camden Bay, Barcey T Levy.   

Abstract

Although the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has recently emerged as an effective and affordable colorectal cancer screening option, many family physician offices continue to use guaiac-based tests. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of FITs in the Iowa Research Network and to assess physicians' knowledge about FITs. A cover letter and questionnaire were faxed twice to the 291 physician members followed up by a mailing. One hundred and seven (37%) questionnaires were returned. Participants' mean age was 55 years with 78 male responders. Fifty-two (49%) of the physician's offices were in a nonmetro area. Fifty-one (49%) reported using guaiac-based tests and 39 (39%) reported using FITs. Many physicians were unsure of the answers for the FIT knowledge questions. FIT use is not widespread in Iowa Research Network physician offices, and not all physicians are aware of the type of fecal occult blood test being conducted in their office.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23686686      PMCID: PMC3755054          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0439-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  9 in total

Review 1.  ROUTINE CHEMICAL TESTS OF THE STOOL FOR OCCULT BLOOD: AN EVALUATION.

Authors:  G V IRONS; J B KIRSNER
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Dong Il Park; Seungho Ryu; Young-Ho Kim; Suck-Ho Lee; Chang Kyun Lee; Chang Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Janneke A Wilschut; Lieke Hol; Evelien Dekker; Jan B Jansen; Monique E Van Leerdam; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ernst J Kuipers; J Dik F Habbema; Marjolein Van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test.

Authors:  Shlomo Birkenfeld; Rachel Gingold Belfer; Miri Chared; Alex Vilkin; Micha Barchana; Irena Lifshitz; Dana Fruchter; Dina Aronski; Ran Balicer; Yaron Niv; Zohar Levi
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Marion R Nadel; Caroline McLeod; Gigi Yuan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  Marion R Nadel; Zahava Berkowitz; Carrie N Klabunde; Robert A Smith; Steven S Coughlin; Mary C White
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.

Authors:  James E Allison; Lori C Sakoda; Theodore R Levin; Jo P Tucker; Irene S Tekawa; Thomas Cuff; Mary Pat Pauly; Lyle Shlager; Albert M Palitz; Wei K Zhao; J Sanford Schwartz; David F Ransohoff; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood--the fecal smear punch-disc test: a new non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C L Songster; G H Barrows; D D Jarrett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Jeanette M Daly; Zsolt J Nagykaldi; Cheryl B Aspy; Rowena J Dolor; Lyle J Fagnan; Barcey T Levy; Hannah L Palac; LeAnn Michaels; V Beth Patterson; Miria Kano; Paul D Smith; Andrew L Sussman; Robert Williams; Pamela Sterling; Maeve O'Beirne; Anne Victoria Neale
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.689

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.