Literature DB >> 23686478

The percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome study.

Lyndon W Mason1, Iqroop Chopra, Khitish Mohanty.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation as a treatment of sacroiliac joint pain has been reported to be successful. This study was a prospective single surgeon series to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous sacroiliac joint stabilisation.
METHODS: Between July 2004 and February 2011, 73 patients underwent percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion in our unit. All patients completed a short form (SF)-36 questionnaire, visual analogue pain score and Majeed scoring questionnaire prior to treatment and at last follow-up.
RESULTS: 55 patients (9 male and 46 female) completed follow-up. The average follow-up period was for 36.18 months (range 12-84). The mean preoperative SF-36 scores were 26.59 for physical health and 40.38 for mental health. The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 42.93 for physical health and 52.77 for mental health. The mean visual analogue pain scores were 8.1 preoperative and 4.5 postoperative. The mean pelvic specific scoring were 36.9 preoperative and 64.78 postoperative. We noted that patients who had previous instrumented spinal surgery did significantly worse than those who had not. We had two nerve root-related complications.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that in selected patient group who respond positively to CT-guided injection, a percutaneous SI joint stabilisation is beneficial in effecting pain relief and functional improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23686478      PMCID: PMC3804714          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2825-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain.

Authors:  H Albert; M Godskesen; J Westergaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions.

Authors:  Thomas T Simopoulos; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Sanjeeva Gupta; Haroon Hameed; Sudhir Diwan; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  S A Majeed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-03

5.  Multivariable analyses of the relationships between age, gender, and body mass index and the source of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Michael J DePalma; Jessica M Ketchum; Thomas R Saullo
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 6.  General principles of diagnostic testing as related to painful lumbar spine disorders: a critical appraisal of current diagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Joel S Saal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  An analysis of reasons for failed back surgery syndrome and partial results after different types of surgical lumbar nerve root decompression.

Authors:  Andrey Bokov; Alexey Isrelov; Alexander Skorodumov; Alexander Aleynik; Alexander Simonov; Sergey Mlyavykh
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  The sacroiliac joint: a potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrum.

Authors:  Victor Katz; Jerome Schofferman; James Reynolds
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-02

9.  [Neurological damage in pelvic injuries: a continuous prospective series of 50 pelvic injuries treated with an iliosacral lag screw].

Authors:  J Tonetti; C Cazal; A Eid; A Badulescu; T Martinez; H Vouaillat; P Merloz
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2004-04

10.  Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation: early treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions.

Authors:  T E Shuler; D C Boone; G S Gruen; A B Peitzman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1995-03
View more
  29 in total

1.  A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Authors:  Jake Heiney; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-22

2.  Physiological in vitro sacroiliac joint motion: a study on three-dimensional posterior pelvic ring kinematics.

Authors:  Niels Hammer; Mario Scholze; Thomas Kibsgård; Stefan Klima; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Ronny Grunert
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.

Authors:  Katie Spain; Timothy Holt
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-19

5.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Psychometric properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Majeed pelvic score in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  Stefan Bajada; Khitish Mohanty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region.

Authors:  Roberto Postacchini; Guido Trasimeni; Francesca Ripani; Pasquale Sessa; Stefano Perotti; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 8.  Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Lingutla; Raymond Pollock; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23

10.  Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Lucas Haase; Paul A Lender; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.