BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding optimum local therapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We examined outcomes according to local treatment type in a large cohort of node-negative TNBC patients. METHODS: A total of 1,242 consecutive patients with TNBC treated at a single institution from 1999 to 2008 were identified. Of these, 646 with pathologic stage T1-2N0 TNBC underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) (N = 448) or total mastectomy (TM) without postmastectomy radiation (N = 198) and comprised the study population. Locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall recurrence were investigated with a competing risk analysis using Gray's test and multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk regression. Overall survival was assessed using standard Kaplan-Meier methods and a Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 78.3 months (range 1-156). Eight-one percent of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. TM patients were younger, were more likely to have lymphovascular invasion, and had larger tumors than patients undergoing BCT (all P ≤ 0.05). The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 4.2 and 5.4 % for patients undergoing BCT and TM, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRR, DM, overall recurrence, disease free survival, or overall survival between groups on univariate analysis, or after adjusting for other variables in multivariate models. Lack of chemotherapy and high tumor stage independently predicted for decreased overall survival (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A low, 5-year risk of LRR (4.7 %) was achieved in a large group of women with T1-2N0 TNBC treated with multimodality therapy. BCT was as equally effective as TM for local and distant control.
BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding optimum local therapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We examined outcomes according to local treatment type in a large cohort of node-negative TNBC patients. METHODS: A total of 1,242 consecutive patients with TNBC treated at a single institution from 1999 to 2008 were identified. Of these, 646 with pathologic stage T1-2N0 TNBC underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) (N = 448) or total mastectomy (TM) without postmastectomy radiation (N = 198) and comprised the study population. Locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall recurrence were investigated with a competing risk analysis using Gray's test and multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk regression. Overall survival was assessed using standard Kaplan-Meier methods and a Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 78.3 months (range 1-156). Eight-one percent of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. TM patients were younger, were more likely to have lymphovascular invasion, and had larger tumors than patients undergoing BCT (all P ≤ 0.05). The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 4.2 and 5.4 % for patients undergoing BCT and TM, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRR, DM, overall recurrence, disease free survival, or overall survival between groups on univariate analysis, or after adjusting for other variables in multivariate models. Lack of chemotherapy and high tumor stage independently predicted for decreased overall survival (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A low, 5-year risk of LRR (4.7 %) was achieved in a large group of women with T1-2N0 TNBC treated with multimodality therapy. BCT was as equally effective as TM for local and distant control.
Authors: Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Soley Bayraktar; Angelica M Gutierrez-Barrera; Diane Liu; Tunc Tasbas; Ugur Akar; Jennifer K Litton; E Lin; Constance T Albarracin; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: T A Buchholz; S L Tucker; J Erwin; D Mathur; E A Strom; M D McNeese; G N Hortobagyi; M Cristofanilli; F J Esteva; L Newman; S E Singletary; A U Buzdar; K K Hunt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Xiudong Lei; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Thomas A Buchholz; Limin Hsu; Aysegul A Sahin; Kim-Anh Do; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Otto Metzger-Filho; Andrew Tutt; Evandro de Azambuja; Kamal S Saini; Giuseppe Viale; Sherene Loi; Ian Bradbury; Judith M Bliss; Hatem A Azim; Paul Ellis; Angelo Di Leo; José Baselga; Christos Sotiriou; Martine Piccart-Gebhart Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nils D Arvold; Alphonse G Taghian; Andrzej Niemierko; Rita F Abi Raad; Meera Sreedhara; Paul L Nguyen; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: A Kümmel; S Kümmel; J Barinoff; F Heitz; J Holtschmidt; W Weikel; F Lorenz-Salehi; A du Bois; P Harter; A Traut; J U Blohmer; B Ataseven Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.915