Literature DB >> 20229176

Efficacy of ixabepilone in ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer.

Edith A Perez1, Tejal Patel, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia.   

Abstract

Patients with ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple negative) breast cancer are not candidates for hormonal therapy or HER2-targeted agents. Ongoing research is aimed at identifying and understanding the benefit of established and emerging therapies in this disease setting. Triple-negative patients may achieve early responses to anthracyclines and taxanes, but novel strategies are also eagerly sought. The epothilone B analog ixabepilone acts to stabilize microtubules and demonstrates antitumor activity in recent breast cancer studies. Herein, we have analyzed efficacy and safety data of ixabepilone specifically for the treatment of women with triple-negative disease. A retrospective analysis was completed using activity and toxicity data in the triple-negative subsets from 5 phase II studies. In addition, a prospective pooled analysis of triple-negative patients from 2 phase III trials is also reviewed. Of 2,261 patients evaluated in these trials, 556 (24.5%) had triple-negative tumors. In the neoadjuvant setting, ixabepilone produced a pathologic complete response rate in the breast of 26% in triple-negative patients (vs. 15% in the non-triple-negative population). In patients with metastatic breast cancer whose pretreatment status ranged from no prior therapy to progression on several classes of agents, overall response rates (ORR) in the phase II ixabepilone monotherapy trials ranged from 6 to 55%, comparable to rates seen in patients with non-triple-negative tumors. The combination of ixabepilone and capecitabine in the phase II study resulted in an ORR of 23% in triple-negative patients. A similar ORR (31%) was observed for a preplanned pooled analysis of triple-negative patients in the phase III trials of ixabepilone plus capecitabine. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for triple-negative patients treated with ixabepilone plus capecitabine (4.2 months) compared with treatment with capecitabine alone (1.7 months). No increase in toxicity was noted in the triple-negative subgroup compared with other patients. Ixabepilone shows notable antitumor activity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer when used in a variety of settings. The addition of ixabepilone to capecitabine results in an approximately twofold increase in median PFS for triple-negative patients versus capecitabine alone and responses to ixabepilone in triple-negative disease are comparable to those seen in patients with non-triple-negative tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229176     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0824-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  25 in total

Review 1.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Recent developments in treatment stratification for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Barton; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Trop-2 Antibody Drug Conjugate Sacituzumab Govitecan (IMMU-132) in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; Ingrid A Mayer; Jennifer R Diamond; Rebecca L Moroose; Steven J Isakoff; Alexander N Starodub; Nikita C Shah; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Kevin Kalinsky; Michael Guarino; Vandana Abramson; Dejan Juric; Sara M Tolaney; Jordan Berlin; Wells A Messersmith; Allyson J Ocean; William A Wegener; Pius Maliakal; Robert M Sharkey; Serengulam V Govindan; David M Goldenberg; Linda T Vahdat
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Triple-negative breast cancer: are we making headway at least?

Authors:  Monica Arnedos; Celine Bihan; Suzette Delaloge; Fabrice Andre
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  Challenges in the Treatment of Triple Negative and HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer.

Authors:  L Alexis Hoeferlin; Charles E Chalfant; Margaret A Park
Journal:  J Surg Sci       Date:  2013-12

Review 6.  Breast-conserving therapy achieves locoregional outcomes comparable to mastectomy in women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Zachary S Zumsteg; Monica Morrow; Brittany Arnold; Junting Zheng; Zhigang Zhang; Mark Robson; Tiffany Traina; Beryl McCormick; Simon Powell; Alice Y Ho
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Relapsed triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Preclinical evaluation of the mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus, in combination with the epothilone B analog, ixabepilone in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christina A von Roemeling; Laura A Marlow; William P Kennedy; Gregory T Kennedy; John A Copland; Michael E Menefee
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Measuring Tumor Epichaperome Expression Using [124I] PU-H71 Positron Emission Tomography as a Biomarker of Response for PU-H71 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Komal L Jhaveri; Carlos H Dos Anjos; Tony Taldone; Rui Wang; Elizabeth Comen; Monica Fornier; Jacqueline F Bromberg; Weining Ma; Sujata Patil; Anna Rodina; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Susan Duggan; Sarhe Khoshi; Nathan Kadija; Gabriela Chiosis; Mark P Dunphy; Shanu Modi
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-17

10.  Ixabepilone administered weekly or every three weeks in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients; a randomized non-comparative phase II trial.

Authors:  George Fountzilas; Vassiliki Kotoula; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Kouvatseas; Eleni Timotheadou; Mattheos Bobos; Xanthipi Mavropoulou; Christos Papadimitriou; Eleni Vrettou; Georgia Raptou; Angelos Koutras; Evangelia Razis; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Epaminontas Samantas; George Pentheroudakis; Dimosthenis V Skarlos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.