Literature DB >> 21606433

Nodal status and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Leonel F Hernandez-Aya1, Mariana Chavez-Macgregor, Xiudong Lei, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Thomas A Buchholz, Limin Hsu, Aysegul A Sahin, Kim-Anh Do, Vicente Valero, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and relationship between tumor size, lymph node status, and prognosis in a large cohort of patients with confirmed triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1,711 patients with TNBC diagnosed between 1980 and 2009. Patients were categorized by tumor size and nodal status. Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). A Sidak adjustment was used for multiple group comparisons. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the association of tumor size and nodal status with survival outcomes after adjustment for other patient and disease characteristics.
RESULTS: Median age was 48 years (range, 21 to 87 years). At a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 0.7 to 317 months), there were 614 deaths and 747 recurrences. The 5-year OS was 80% for node-negative patients (N0), 65% for one to three positive lymph nodes (N1), 48% for four to nine positive lymph nodes (N2), and 44% for ≥ 10 positive lymph nodes (N3; P < .0001). The 5-year RFS rates were 67% for N0, 52% for N1, 36% for N2, and 33% for N3 (P < .0001). Pairwise comparison by nodal status showed that when comparing N0 with node-positive disease, there was a significant difference in OS and RFS (P < .001 all comparisons). However, when comparing N1 with N2 and N3 disease regardless of tumor size, there were no significant differences in OS or RFS.
CONCLUSION: In patients with TNBC, once there is evidence of lymph node metastasis, the prognosis may not be affected by the number of positive lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606433      PMCID: PMC3139370          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.1877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

1.  Nuclear structure in cancer tissues.

Authors:  M M BLACK; F D SPEER
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1957-07

2.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases.

Authors:  C L Carter; C Allen; D E Henson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The world Health Organization Histological Typing of Breast Tumors--Second Edition. The World Organization.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Tumor size and survival in breast cancer--a reappraisal.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Edward H Romond; Edith A Perez; John Bryant; Vera J Suman; Charles E Geyer; Nancy E Davidson; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Silvana Martino; Soonmyung Paik; Peter A Kaufman; Sandra M Swain; Thomas M Pisansky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Leila A Kutteh; Victor G Vogel; Daniel W Visscher; Greg Yothers; Robert B Jenkins; Ann M Brown; Shaker R Dakhil; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Wilma L Lingle; Pamela M Klein; James N Ingle; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Prognostic significance of basal-like phenotype and fascin expression in node-negative invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Socorro María Rodríguez-Pinilla; David Sarrió; Emiliano Honrado; David Hardisson; Francisco Calero; Javier Benitez; José Palacios
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary; Craig Allred; Pandora Ashley; Lawrence W Bassett; Donald Berry; Kirby I Bland; Patrick I Borgen; Gary M Clark; Stephen B Edge; Daniel F Hayes; Lorie L Hughes; Robert V P Hutter; Monica Morrow; David L Page; Abram Recht; Richard L Theriault; Ann Thor; Donald L Weaver; H Samuel Wieand; Frederick L Greene
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Imaging tumour heterogeneity of the consequences of a PKCα-substrate interaction in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Gregory Weitsman; Katherine Lawler; Muireann T Kelleher; James E Barrett; Paul R Barber; Eamon Shamil; Frederic Festy; Gargi Patel; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Lufei Huang; Iain D C Tullis; Natalie Woodman; Enyinnaya Ofo; Simon M Ameer-Beg; Sheeba Irshad; John Condeelis; Cheryl E Gillett; Paul A Ellis; Borivoj Vojnovic; Anthony C C Coolen; Tony Ng
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  Finding ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Hartge; James L Speyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Triple-negative breast cancer is not a contraindication for breast conservation.

Authors:  Farrell C Adkins; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Jennifer K Litton; Jamie Wagner; Kelly K Hunt; Wendy A Woodward; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Clinical efficacy of administering oxaliplatin combined with S-1 in the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Yang Xiao; Wei Wei; Jian-Xiong Guo; Yang-Chen Liu; Xiao-Hong Huang; Rong-Xia Zhang; Yi-Jia Wu; Juan Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Altered local and systemic immune profiles underlie lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Neta S Zuckerman; Hongxiang Yu; Diana L Simons; Nupur Bhattacharya; Valeria Carcamo-Cavazos; Ning Yan; Frederick M Dirbas; Denise L Johnson; Erich J Schwartz; Peter P Lee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Na Yuan; Min Meng; Caigang Liu; Lu Feng; Lei Hou; Qian Ning; Guohong Xin; Li Pei; Shanzhi Gu; Xiao Li; Xinhan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

7.  Prognostic Factors in Operated Stage IIIC, Pathological N3a Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ibrahim Turker; Ulku Y Arslan; Ozan Yazici; Ummugul Uyeturk; Berna Oksuzoglu; Burcin Budakoglu; Nuriye Özdemir; Ozlem U Sonmez; Kaan Helvaci; Onur Esbah; Oznur Bal; Ahmet S Ekinci; Nurullah Zengin
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The metastatic potential of triple-negative breast cancer is decreased via caloric restriction-mediated reduction of the miR-17~92 cluster.

Authors:  Lianjin Jin; Meng Lim; Shuping Zhao; Yuri Sano; Brittany A Simone; Jason E Savage; Eric Wickstrom; Kevin Camphausen; Richard G Pestell; Nicole L Simone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Breast-conserving therapy achieves locoregional outcomes comparable to mastectomy in women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Zachary S Zumsteg; Monica Morrow; Brittany Arnold; Junting Zheng; Zhigang Zhang; Mark Robson; Tiffany Traina; Beryl McCormick; Simon Powell; Alice Y Ho
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Effect of Lump Size and Nodal Status on Prognosis in Invasive Breast Cancer: Experience from Rural India.

Authors:  Monique Garg; Nitin Nagpal; Darshan Singh Sidhu; Amandeep Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.