Literature DB >> 23684268

Assessment and longitudinal analysis of health impacts and stressors perceived to result from unconventional shale gas development in the Marcellus Shale region.

Kyle J Ferrar1, Jill Kriesky, Charles L Christen, Lynne P Marshall, Samantha L Malone, Ravi K Sharma, Drew R Michanowicz, Bernard D Goldstein.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Concerns for health and social impacts have arisen as a result of Marcellus Shale unconventional natural gas development. Our goal was to document the self-reported health impacts and mental and physical health stressors perceived to result from Marcellus Shale development.
METHODS: Two sets of interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of community members living proximal to Marcellus Shale development, session 1 March-September 2010 (n = 33) and session 2 January-April 2012 (n = 20). Symptoms of health impacts and sources of psychological stress were coded. Symptom and stressor counts were quantified for each interview. The counts for each participant were compared longitudinally.
RESULTS: Participants attributed 59 unique health impacts and 13 stressors to Marcellus Shale development. Stress was the most frequently-reported symptom. Over time, perceived health impacts increased (P = 0·042), while stressors remained constant (P = 0·855). DISCUSSION: Exposure-based epidemiological studies are needed to address identified health impacts and those that may develop as unconventional natural gas extraction continues. Many of the stressors can be addressed immediately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23684268     DOI: 10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 1077-3525


  30 in total

1.  The importance of public health agency independence: Marcellus shale gas drilling in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Popular epidemiology and "fracking": citizens' concerns regarding the economic, environmental, health and social impacts of unconventional natural gas drilling operations.

Authors:  Martha Powers; Poune Saberi; Richard Pepino; Emily Strupp; Eva Bugos; Carolyn C Cannuscio
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-06

3.  Unconventional natural gas development and adverse birth outcomes in Pennsylvania: The potential mediating role of antenatal anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Dana E Goin; Kara E Rudolph; Brian S Schwartz; Dione Mercer; Holly Elser; Ellen A Eisen; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 4.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Unconventional natural gas development and hospitalizations: evidence from Pennsylvania, United States, 2003-2014.

Authors:  A Denham; M Willis; A Zavez; E Hill
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  The role of toxicological science in meeting the challenges and opportunities of hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein; Bryan W Brooks; Steven D Cohen; Alexander E Gates; Michael E Honeycutt; John B Morris; Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta; Trevor M Penning; John Snawder
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Shale gas development in Canada: what are the potential health effects?

Authors:  Lalita Bharadwaj; Bernard D Goldstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Community Members.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2020-02-06

9.  Fracked ecology: Response of aquatic trophic structure and mercury biomagnification dynamics in the Marcellus Shale Formation.

Authors:  Christopher James Grant; Allison K Lutz; Aaron D Kulig; Mitchell R Stanton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  A systematic evaluation of chemicals in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and wastewater for reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Adrienne S Ettinger; Brian P Leaderer; Michael B Bracken; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.