Literature DB >> 1987953

The relationship of visual acuity, refractive error, and pupil size after radial keratotomy.

J T Holladay1, M J Lynn, G O Waring, M Gemmill, G C Keehn, B Fielding.   

Abstract

To better define the relationship between residual refractive error, uncorrected visual acuity, and pupil diameter, we compared 42 eyes that had an eight-incision radial keratotomy according to the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study protocol with 42 matched control eyes. The parameters measured were best corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity, and the change in cycloplegic refraction with enlarging pupil diameter. The best corrected visual acuity was 20/16 in both the radial keratotomy and control groups, but the variability (SD) was higher in the radial keratotomy group. The average uncorrected visual acuity was 0.35 (35%) better in the radial keratotomy group, but the variability was 1.77 times higher. Change in refraction with dilation occurred in 9% of the controls and 36% of the radial keratotomy patients, indicating a significant difference (P = .002). The change in refraction with dilation in the eyes with radial keratotomy was almost equally split between a hyperopic change (17%) and a myopic change (18%), which was much different than in the control eyes, only 2% of which changed in a hyperopic direction and 7% in a myopic direction. The radial keratotomy patients with a myopic change had the best uncorrected visual acuity, indicating that positive spherical aberration yielded the best aspherical surface for uncorrected visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1987953     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080010072036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  24 in total

1.  Lamellar keratotomy to correct astigmatism in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Wirbelauer; Tiziana Böhm; Heike Häberle; Duy Thoai Pham
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Optical quality of the cornea following incisional correction of astigmatism].

Authors:  T Böhm; C Wirbelauer; D T Pham
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Relationship between anterior corneal asphericity and refractive variables.

Authors:  Amelia Nieto-Bona; Amalia Lorente-Velázquez; Robert Mòntes-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Calculating the error in refractive error.

Authors:  R H Taylor; R B Ellingham; S Subramaniam; L A Wakely
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Effect of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  M C Corbett; S Verma; D P O'Brart; K M Oliver; G Heacock; J Marshall
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Assessment of imaging with extended depth-of-field by means of the light sword lens in terms of visual acuity scale.

Authors:  Karol Kakarenko; Izabela Ducin; Krzysztof Grabowiecki; Zbigniew Jaroszewicz; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; Krzysztof Petelczyc; Aleksandra Składowska; Maciej Sypek
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  The influence of optical aberrations in refractive surgery.

Authors:  Badescu Silvia Valentina; Barac Ramona; Schmitzer Speranta; Tataru Calin
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

8.  Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Renfeng Xu; Larry Thibos; Gildas Marin; Martha Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Method for expressing clinical and statistical significance of ocular and corneal wave front error aberrations.

Authors:  Michael K Smolek
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.

Authors:  Renfeng Xu; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.