Literature DB >> 2050073

A model-free approach to low-dose extrapolation.

D Krewski1, D Gaylor, M Szyszkowicz.   

Abstract

Estimates of risk associated with exposure to low levels of carcinogenic substances present in the environment are generally obtained by linear extrapolation from higher exposure levels at which risks can be estimated directly. In this paper, we examine the scientific basis for the assumption of low-dose linearity in carcinogenic risk assessment and the different statistical methods that have been proposed for linear extrapolation. A model-free approach to linear extrapolation is described and illustrated using epidemiological data on radiation carcinogenesis. The statistical properties of this method are empirically assessed using 572 selected sets of bioassay data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2050073      PMCID: PMC1519485          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  24 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic activation of aromatic amine carcinogens in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  F A Beland
Journal:  J UOEH       Date:  1989-03-20

2.  Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  K S Crump; H A Guess; K L Deal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Evaluation of safety for food additives: An illustration involving the influence of methyl salicylate on rat reproduction.

Authors:  M A Gross; O G Fitzhugh
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Carcinogenic risk assessment: a guide to the literature.

Authors:  D Krewski; C Brown
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Incorporation of background in dose-response models.

Authors:  D G Hoel
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1980-01

6.  Linear interpolation algorithm for low dose risk assessment of toxic substances.

Authors:  D W Gaylor; R L Kodell
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1980-11

7.  Quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  J Van Ryzin
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1980-05

8.  Implication of nonlinear kinetics on risk estimation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  D G Hoel; N L Kaplan; M W Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; A G Knudson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Carcinogenic effects of chronic exposure to very low levels of toxic substances.

Authors:  R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Lead, cadmium, arsenic and zinc in the ecosystem surrounding a lead smelter.

Authors:  W Pilgrim; R N Hughes
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Evaluation of health risks for contaminated aquifers.

Authors:  W T Piver; T L Jacobs; M A Medina
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Biological bases for cancer dose-response extrapolation procedures.

Authors:  J D Wilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Trends in quantitative cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S C Morris
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.