Literature DB >> 23682907

Measuring the impacts of seclusion on psychiatry inpatients and the effectiveness of a pilot single-session post-seclusion counselling intervention.

Fiona Whitecross1, Amy Seeary, Stuart Lee.   

Abstract

Despite the accumulation of evidence demonstrating patients' accounts of trauma associated with seclusion, the use of evidence-based post-seclusion debriefing is not apparent in the published work. This study aimed to identify the impacts seclusion has on an individual using the Impact of Events - Revised (IES-R), a standardized and widely used measure of trauma symptoms, and measure the effectiveness of a post-seclusion counselling intervention in mitigating the experience of seclusion-related trauma and reducing time spent in seclusion. The study design involved a comparison of the seclusion-related trauma and time in seclusion that was experienced by consenting patients managed on the two inpatient wards of Alfred Psychiatry. To investigate the efficacy of post-seclusion counselling to reduce event-related trauma as well as the use of seclusion, a brief single-session intervention was piloted comparing outcomes for patients treated on a ward implementing semistructured post-seclusion counselling and patients treated on a ward continuing with post-seclusion support as usual. A total of 31 patients consented to participate, with approximately 47% reporting trauma symptoms consistent with 'probable post-traumatic stress disorder' (IES-R total score, >33), although there was no difference in trauma experience between groups. Significantly fewer hours were spent in seclusion for patients treated on the ward piloting the post-seclusion counselling intervention. Findings, therefore, highlight not only the potential for significant trauma stemming from a seclusion event, but also the capacity for the implementation of such interventions as post-seclusion counselling to raise awareness of the need to minimize time spent in seclusion for patients.
© 2013 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  post-seclusion counselling; practice change; seclusion; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23682907     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  6 in total

1.  Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.

Authors:  Sophie Hirsch; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilera-Serrano; Jose Guzman-Parra; Juan A Garcia-Sanchez; Berta Moreno-Küstner; Fermin Mayoral-Cleries
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Samia Hurst; Stefan Kaiser; Othman Sentissi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Thibaut; Lindsay Helen Dewa; Sonny Christian Ramtale; Danielle D'Lima; Sheila Adam; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Stephanie Archer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Aims to Reduce Coercive Measures in Forensic Inpatient Treatment: A 9-Year Observational Study.

Authors:  Steffen Lau; Nathalie Brackmann; Andreas Mokros; Elmar Habermeyer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christiane Montag; Lieselotte Mahler; Alexandre Wullschleger; Angelika Vandamme; Juliane Mielau; Lara Renner; Felix Bermpohl; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.270

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.