Literature DB >> 23682343

Stereotactic surgery for eating disorders.

Bomin Sun1, Wei Liu.   

Abstract

EATING DISORDERS (EDS) ARE A GROUP OF SEVERELY IMPAIRED EATING BEHAVIORS, WHICH INCLUDE THREE SUBGROUPS: anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and ED not otherwise specified (EDNOS). The precise mechanism of EDs is still unclear and the disorders cause remarkable agony for the patients and their families. Although there are many available treatment methods for EDs today, such as family therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, medication, psychotherapy, and so on, almost half of the patients are refractory to all current medical treatment and never fully recover. For treatment-refractory EDs, stereotactic surgery may be an alternative therapy. This review discusses the history of stereotactic surgery, the modern procedures, and the mostly used targets of stereotactic surgery in EDs. In spite of the limited application of stereotactic surgery in ED nowadays, stereotactic lesion and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are promising treatments with the development of modern functional imaging techniques and the increasing understanding of its mechanism in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorexia nervosa; eating disorders; stereotactic neurosurgery; surgical treatment

Year:  2013        PMID: 23682343      PMCID: PMC3654774          DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.110668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Eating disorders (EDs), which are characterized by severely impaired eating behavior, are one of the most common health problems afflicting female adolescents and young women and have been reported worldwide both in developed countries and emerging economies such as Brazil and China.[121624] EDs are divided into three subgroups: Anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and ED not otherwise specified (EDNOS) according to the Diagnostic Criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). The most common symptoms in EDs are restrictive food intake, binge eating, excessive exercise, and body image disturbance. In addition, psychiatric comorbidity, such as obsessive and compulsive disorders (OCDs), affective disorders, and anxiety disorders, could be found in most of the ED patients. Lifetime prevalence of EDs (including the three major EDs) worldwide is estimated at about 4-6%.[2445] The lifetime prevalence was about 1.75-3 times higher among women than men and the age of onset of AN and BN has decreased in younger generations.[1824] EDs, which have one of the highest excessive mortality rates of all psychiatric disorders, cause remarkable agony for the patients and their families. Suicide or medical complications are the major causes of mortality for those with EDs.[619] Risk factors such as genetic, environmental, and developmental factors have been well established. The interaction between genetic factors and environmental factors play a key role in the etiology of the disease.[92744] Twin and family studies indicate that EDs including AN, BN, and EDNOS are complex genetic diseases, and the genetic factors contribute 50-83% of the variance in AN, BN, and EDNOS.[10132538] Besides, linkage studies further confirmed that about a third of genetic risk for EDs and depression, anxiety disorders, and addictive disorders are shared.[202848] The neurocircuitry underlying food intake is complex and the precise mechanism of EDs is still unclear. However, it is believed that the reward system and hypothalamus play critical roles in the progression of the disease. The hypothalamus has projections directly to the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). The NAcc is of interest because of its indication in the reward of natural behaviors, such as exercise, sex, and feeding.[5254] Besides the NAcc, there are other brain regions engaged in EDs such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, and striatum.[22] Although there are many available treatment methods for EDs today, such as family therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, medication, psychotherapy, and so on, almost 50% of the patients are refractory to all current medical treatment and never fully recover. The standardized mortality ratio over the first 10 years is about 10%.[33] For treatment-refractory EDs, stereotactic surgery may be an alternative therapy.

STEREOTACTIC SURGERY FOR EATING DISORDERS

Early in the 1960s, White Le et al. found that lesions in the lateral hypothalamus could produce a variety of levels of feeding response, which indicates the close relationship between EDs and the hypothalamus.[50] This finding was confirmed by many reports from different medical centers over the next 30 years.[152223294046] In particular, Barbier et al. reported an interesting case with comorbid AN and OCD. They suggested that bilateral anterior capsulotomy can be a therapeutic option for patients with comorbid AN and OCD.[4] All these findings expanded the knowledge of the neurocircuit associated with EDs and provided the potential targets for stereotactic surgery. Before the application of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the target of stereotactic surgery for EDs was mainly based on the empirical findings on brain lesions. At first, limited by the understanding of neural circuit for EDs and the stereotactic surgery method, lobotomy was the most common surgical intervention for the treatment of EDs. For example, Sifneos presented a successful treatment of one case of AN by a unilateral lower quadrant leucotomy in 1952.[41] In that same year, Carmody et al. reported a refractory case of AN treated by prefrontal lobotomy.[11] Zamboni et al. described two patients suffering from an extremely severe, chronic, and refractory anorectic syndrome. Both patients underwent bilateral stereotactic thalamotomy and subsequently regained weight.[55] In spite of the fact that the leucotomy and thalamotomy were successful in these sporadic cases, considering the complication and irreversible invasive procedure, it was believed that such operations should be considered only after other forms of treatment had failed.

MODERN PROCEDURES

The modern psychosurgery consisted of lesions and deep brain stimulation (DBS), which were guided by either CT or MRI. The most common lesions were the anterior capsulotomy, anterior cingulotomy, subcaudate tractotomy, and limbic leucotomy.[8] As neuroimaging methods became widely applied (e.g., CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, (PET-CT), and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)), modern psychosurgery became more accurate and minimally invasive. In particular, the DBS was accepted worldwide because of its reversibility. In recent decades, DBS has had great success in treatment of movement disorders and some psychiatric disorders such as OCD and depression. Hence, a resurgence of psychosurgery has been recognized in the treatment of many psychiatric disorders. Sun reported on DBS of NAcc for medical treatment of AN. (13th North American Neuromodulation Congress, Las Vegas 2006.12) In 2011, Barbier et al. reported an interesting case with comorbid AN and OCD treated with capsulotomy.[4] In 2012, Wu et al. showed that the use of DBS to treat AN may be a valuable option for weight restoration in otherwise-refractory cases.[53] Moreover, Sun et al. reported a long-term follow-up results of surgical treatment and a grading for AN that indicated DBS being only helpful for patients without bulimia, otherwise patients with severe AN could get excellent results after bilateral capsulotomies (American society for stereotactic and functional neurosurgery (ASSFN), San Francisco, 2012.6). These studies lead the way in exploiting the potential role of stereotactic surgery in the treatment of EDs.

THE TARGETS FOR EATING DISORDERS

The target of the stereotactic surgery for psychiatric disorders has been discussed in the literature. For lesion sites, cingulate gyrus and anterior limb of internal capsule are the most important targets according to the proposal of an anatomic basis of emotions in 1937 by Papez.[35] Anterior cingulotomy and anterior capsulotomy showed acceptable results in the treatment of mental disorders.[5] Compared with lesions, DBS has more flexible targets because of its reversibility and adaptability.[5] The most commonly used targets for DBS are the Globus Pallidus Internus (GPi), Subthalamic Nucleus (STN), Anterior Hypothalamus, and NAcc. Although little published data are yet available in EDs, all of these potential targets have been suggested based on preliminary evidence in animal tests and clinical case reports.

Globus pallidus internus

The globus pallidus, also known as paleostriatum, is a sub-cortical structure of the brain. It is located just inside the putamen, with an outer part and an inner part. GPi was mainly used as the target for the treatment of movement disorders. However, there are some reports indicating that GPi is related with the weight changes.[313443] For example, Ondo et al. showed significant weight gain in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have undergone unilateral pallidotomy in their study.[34]

Subthalamic nucleus

This is currently the preferred target because of its effectiveness on the treatment of dopaminergic symptoms of PD. At the same time, the body weight gain in PD patients who underwent DBS sparked researcher interest.[3243] Walker et al. studied the weight changes in 39 patients with PD undergoing unilateral STN DBS and found a significant weight gain after the surgery.[49] Bannier et al. also reported that, 16 months after the surgery, 82% of DBS patients followed were overweight.[3]

Anterior hypothalamus

It is believed that the neural structures in the anterior hypothalamic area are involved in the control of feeding behavior and metabolism of food. Lacan et al. found that total food consumption increased after the 3-month bilateral implant of electrodes and subsequent periods of high-frequency ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) stimulation.[30]

Nucleus accumbens

NAcc, as part of the reward center, is thought to play an important role in reward, pleasure, addition, and placebo effect. Animal experimental data have suggested that the NAcc might be a potential target for AN either alone or combined with anterior capsulotomy.[264247] Van der Plasse et al. examined the effect of DBS-NAcc on food-directed behavior. Their data revealed a functional dissociation between the Lateral Shell (lShell) and Medial Shell (mShell). On one hand, DBS of the lShell reduced motivation to respond for sucrose under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, while on the other hand, mShell DBS profoundly and selectively increased the intake of food, which indicates that the intake of food and motivation to get palatable food can be independently modulated by DBS in subregions of the NAcc shell.[47] In 2012, Sun et al. reported a NAcc targeted DBS study of four patients with refractory AN [Figure 1]. This is the first study targeting the NAcc for EDs in humans.[53]
Figure 1

Notice the decrease in fluro-deoxy-glucose uptake after DBS of the nucleus accumbens in a patient with nervous anorexia

Notice the decrease in fluro-deoxy-glucose uptake after DBS of the nucleus accumbens in a patient with nervous anorexia

Anterior capsule

Many publications have shown excellent effects using lesion or DBS in the anterior capsule in patients with OCD and other psychiatric disorders. Because AN belongs to obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, it is reasonable that the anterior capsule also is affected in AN. Sun et al. reported perfect long-term follow-up results in patients with severe anorexia patients who underwent bilateral anterior capsulotomy (ASSFN 2001).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Minimal invasion of the brain and maximal efficacy are the principles of stereotactic neurosurgery. With rapid advancements made in functional neuroimaging methods, the lesions have become more accurate and less invasive. Anterior capsulotomy and anterior cingulotomy are currently the most commonly employed neurosurgical procedures for psychiatric disease. Despite the lack of research for capsulotomy and cingulotomy focused on the EDs, these two safe procedures are still potential surgical techniques.

ANTERIOR CAPSULOTOMY

Anterior capsulotomy was first performed by Tailarach in the late 1940s and further developed by Lars Leksell.[21] In this procedure, lesions are placed within the anterior limb of the internal capsule to cut the connective fibers between prefrontal cortex and subcortical nuclei (dorsomedial thalamus included). The lesions are made using thermocoagulation through stereotactic burr holes in the skull guided by CT or MRI. Because there is a large individual difference in anterior capsule, MRI targeting became the best modality to ensure accuracy when making lesions or implant DBS electrodes in the anterior capsule target.

ANTERIOR CINGULOTOMY

The procedure was first performed in the early 1950s and was subsequently made popular in America.[51] Ballantine et al. subsequently showed the safety of anterior cingulotomy and studied its efficacy for a broad range of psychiatric indications.[2] The functional and stereotactic neurosurgery group in Massachusetts General Hospital has had rich experience with anterior cingulotomy and is still engaged in this procedure. Lesions are made on each side by thermocoagulation with MRI.

DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION

Comparing to the lesions, DBS offers the prospect of a reversible method for effective neuromodulation to relieve suffering in severe and treatment-refractory EDs. In 1954, Pool et al. attempted to treat a woman with anorexia and depression by stimulating the caudate nucleus.[39] In the next 50 years, DBS was mostly used in the animals to explore the possible mechanism of EDs and later observed in a study of four patients with refractory AN by Sun et al.,[34] but the good surgical results of DBS were found only in patients with anorexia who did not exhibit bulimia and vomiting (ASSFN 2012).

EFFECTS OF STEREOTACTIC SURGERY FOR EATING DISORDERS

Most of the studies about the effects of stereotactic surgery for EDs are based on the animal experiments and sporadic case reports. Montaurier et al. explored the weight changes in PD patients treated with DBS-STN implantation and they found that the stimulation of STN area might favor body weight gain in PD patients.[32] The same phenomena were found in other targets of DBS treatment. In 2012, Sun et al. reported a NAcc targeted DBS study of four patients with refractory AN. They reported an average of 65% increase in body weight in four severe and refractory patients with AN after the DBS procedure in a 3 years follow-up. Compared with BMI improvement, comorbidities such as body image disturbance and personality disorders had less improvement after surgical treatment. In spite of abundant findings of the weight gain in clinical reports, the exact effect of the stereotactic surgery in EDs is still equivocal due to the lack of controlled and well-designed studies in large samples.

COMPLICATIONS AND SIDE EFFECTS OF STEREOTACTIC SURGERY FOR ANOREXIA NERVOSA

Very few publications of surgical treatment for anorexia are available. In general, the complications of psychosurgery include serious complications such as coma, hemorrhage in the brain, paralysis, seizures, and infection. Some of these may be fatal for the patients. However, the incidence of these complications is very low. Cosgrove and Rauch reported on more than 800 cingulotomies performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital over a 40-year period. There were no deaths and only two infections.[14] Side effects, no matter short-term or long-term, are usually not lethal. Short-term side effects include incontinence, disorientation, sleep-disorder, and headache. These symptoms usually disappeared in one month after the operation. A few patients experienced the long-term side effects including memory loss, fatigue, and personality changes.[83653] DBS has hardware-related problems besides the surgical complications such as lead or wire fracture, skin infection, malfunction of IPG, and lead migration.[137] Bhatia et al. reviewed a total of 191 patients who received 330 electrode implants and found that overall incidence of hardware-related problems were 4.2% based on the total number of systems implanted. The mean duration between implantation and complication was 1.8 years.[7] Doshi reported similar results in their study.[17]

CONCLUSION

EDs are complex and severe, sometimes life-threatening, psychiatric disorders with high relapse rates under standard treatments. In spite of the limited application of stereotactic surgery in ED nowadays, stereotactic lesion and DBS are promising treatments awaiting further controlled studies in larger samples. There are several concerns to address in order to spread the application of stereotactic surgery in EDs. First, precise targeting confirmed with the help of modern functional imaging techniques await definition based on functional imaging such as PET-CT, fMRI. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of the exact etiology and pathogenesis of ED must be researched. Second, the continuing evolution of stereotactic and functional techniques should be made to reduce the damage to the brain as much as possible. And last, more specific psychometric testing methods could be used to better define positive and negative ED outcomes.
  54 in total

1.  Weight changes in subthalamic nucleus vs globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation: results from the COMPARE Parkinson disease deep brain stimulation cohort.

Authors:  Maren C Locke; Samuel S Wu; Kelly D Foote; Marco Sassi; Charles E Jacobson; Ramon L Rodriguez; Hubert H Fernandez; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  A case of anorexia nervosa treated successfully by leucotomy.

Authors:  P E SIFNEOS
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Electrode dysfunctions in patients with deep brain stimulation: a clinical retrospective study.

Authors:  Niels Allert; Markella Markou; Anna Antonina Miskiewicz; Lars Nolden; Hans Karbe
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Stereotactic limbic leucotomy--a follow-up study of thirty patients.

Authors:  D Kelly; N Mitchell-Heggs
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  A putaminal lesion in an adolescent with obsessive-compulsive disorder and atypical anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  J Hebebrand; P Siemon; A Lutcke; G MariB; H Remschmidt
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Suicide attempts in anorexia nervosa subtypes.

Authors:  Laura Forcano; Eva Alvarez; Juan J Santamaría; Susana Jimenez-Murcia; Roser Granero; Eva Penelo; Pino Alonso; Isabel Sánchez; Jose M Menchón; Frances Ulman; Cynthia M Bulik; Fernando Fernández-Aranda
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 7.  Modern neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  D K Binder; B J Iskandar
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Brain lesions and eating disorders.

Authors:  R Uher; J Treasure
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Weight changes associated with unilateral STN DBS and advanced PD.

Authors:  Harrison C Walker; Michael Lyerly; Gary Cutter; Johnson Hagood; Natividad P Stover; Stephanie L Guthrie; Barton L Guthrie; Ray L Watts
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 10.  Stereotactic cingulotomy.

Authors:  G Rees Cosgrove; Scott L Rauch
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation hardware-related infections: 10-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Royce W Woodroffe; Brian Park; Francis J Jareczek; Yasunori Nagahama; Nolan Winslow; Loreen A Herwaldt; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  The present indication and future of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Kenji Sugiyama; Takao Nozaki; Tetsuya Asakawa; Shinichiro Koizumi; Osamu Saitoh; Hiroki Namba
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 3.  Brain Stimulation in Eating Disorders: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Philibert Duriez; Rami Bou Khalil; Yara Chamoun; Redwan Maatoug; Robertas Strumila; Maude Seneque; Philip Gorwood; Philippe Courtet; Sébastien Guillaume
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.