Literature DB >> 21293168

Long-term surgical and hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation.

Paresh K Doshi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of surgical and hardware-associated complications of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for a range of movement disorders.
METHODS: The study design is a retrospective analysis and review of surgical and hardware complications of DBS performed by a single surgeon from 1999 to 2009. A total of 153 cases of DBS (298 electrodes) for various movement disorders and a minimum follow-up of 1 year have been included. Two patients could not be implanted. A further 54 patients who underwent change of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) have been included for analysis of hardware-related complications.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 64 ± 36.15 (range = 12-129) months for the DBS group. Twenty-four (15.6%) patients developed complications. Confusion occurred in 3.9%, vasovagal attack in 1.9%, lead migration/misplaced lead in 2.5%, erosion and infection in 4.5% and IPG malfunction occurred in 1.4% of the patients. When calculated with respect to the number of electrodes and IPG replacements, the complication rate was lower (11.9%). Three patients had their system explanted, two of them being patients with dystonia who had inadvertently damaged their operative site.
CONCLUSION: DBS surgery is a relatively safe surgery, with most of the complications being minor, without long-term morbidity. The complication rate in elderly (age ≥65 years) is comparable to that in younger patients. However, confusion is more frequent in this age group, and patients and relatives can be prepared to accept this as a transient morbidity.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21293168     DOI: 10.1159/000323372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  21 in total

Review 1.  Deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  X L Chen; Y Y Xiong; G L Xu; X F Liu
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-09

2.  Deep brain stimulation hardware-related infections: 10-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Royce W Woodroffe; Brian Park; Francis J Jareczek; Yasunori Nagahama; Nolan Winslow; Loreen A Herwaldt; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  [Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: timing and patient selection].

Authors:  R Erasmi; G Deuschl; K Witt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Deep brain stimulation of the human reward system for major depression--rationale, outcomes and outlook.

Authors:  Thomas E Schlaepfer; Bettina H Bewernick; Sarah Kayser; Rene Hurlemann; Volker A Coenen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Deep brain stimulation in the central nucleus of the amygdala decreases 'wanting' and 'liking' of food rewards.

Authors:  Shani E Ross; Emily Lehmann Levin; Christy A Itoga; Chelsea B Schoen; Romeissa Selmane; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Morphological and chemical analysis of a deep brain stimulation electrode explanted from a dystonic patient.

Authors:  Carlo Marras; Michele Rizzi; Luca Ravagnan; Alessandro De Benedictis; Giovanna Zorzi; Gero Bongiorno; Davide Marchesi; Giuseppe Messina; Roberto Cordella; Angelo Franzini
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease prior to L-dopa treatment: A case report.

Authors:  Domenico Servello; Christian Saleh; Alberto R Bona; Edvin Zekaj; Carlotta Zanaboni; Mauro Porta
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-14

8.  Single-Stage Deep Brain Stimulator Placement for Movement Disorders: A Case Series.

Authors:  Arrin Brooks; Alastair T Hoyt
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-03

9.  Stereotactic surgery for eating disorders.

Authors:  Bomin Sun; Wei Liu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-04-17

10.  Long-Term Performance and User Satisfaction With Implanted Neuroprostheses for Upright Mobility After Paraplegia: 2- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Kevin M Foglyano; Rudi Kobetic; Lisa M Lombardo; Michael E Miller; Gilles Pinault
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.