Literature DB >> 23680627

Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser platforms in contralateral eyes.

Mohamad Rosman1, Reece C Hall, Cordelia Chan, Andy Ang, Jane Koh, Hla Myint Htoon, Donald T H Tan, Jodhbir S Mehta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, predictability, and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using 2 femtosecond platforms for flap creation.
SETTING: Multisurgeon single center.
DESIGN: Clinical trial.
METHODS: Bilateral femtosecond LASIK was performed using the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser system. The Visumax femtosecond platform (Group 1) was used to create the LASIK flap in 1 eye, while the Intralase femtosecond platform (Group 2) was used to create the LASIK flap in the contralateral eye. The preoperative, 1-month, and 3-month postoperative visual acuities, refraction, and contrast sensitivity in the 2 groups were compared.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 45 patients. Three months after femtosecond LASIK, 79.5% of eyes in Group 1 and 82.1% in Group 2 achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 (P=.808). The mean efficacy index was 0.97 in Group 1 and 0.98 in Group 2 at 3 months (P=.735); 89.7% of eyes in Group 1 and 84.6% of eyes in Group 2 were within ± 0.50 diopter of emmetropia at 3 months (P=.498). No eye in either group lost more than 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The mean safety index at 3 months was 1.11 in Group 1 and 1.10 in Group 2 (P=.570).
CONCLUSION: The results of LASIK with both femtosecond lasers were similar, and both platforms produced efficacious and predictable LASIK outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23680627     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  11 in total

1.  [LenSx® femto-LASIK, FEMTO LDV Z4® femto-LASIK, and PRK : Comparison of refractive results and an analysis of complications].

Authors:  T Pahlitzsch; M-L Pahlitzsch; U Sumarni; M Pahlitzsch
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Comparison of visual performance recovery after thin-flap LASIK with 4 femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Yan Zheng; Qian Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Long-term safety of laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with thin corneas: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yao-Wen Song; Rui He; Jack X Ma; Douglas D Koch; Li Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparison of efficacy, safety, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis using two laser suites.

Authors:  Alexandra Meidani; Chara Tzavara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-24

5.  Visumax femtolasik versus Moria M2 microkeratome in mild to moderate myopia: efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrometric changes and flap thickness predictability.

Authors:  Magda A Torky; Yousif A Al Zafiri; Abeer M Khattab; Rania K Farag; Eman A Awad
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Predictive Factors for Successful High Myopia Treatment Using High-Frequency Laser-In-Situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Widya Artini; Setyo B Riyanto; Johan A Hutauruk; Tjahjono D Gondhowiardjo; Aria Kekalih
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2018-07-23

7.  Comparison of corneal sensitivity, tear function and corneal staining following laser in situ keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms.

Authors:  Andrea Petznick; Annabel Chew; Reece C Hall; Cordelia Ml Chan; Mohamad Rosman; Donald Tan; Louis Tong; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-24

8.  Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties modification after small incision lenticule extraction using Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua; Roberta Calienno; Manuela Lanzini; Martina Colasante; Alessandra Mastropasqua; Peter A Mattei; Mario Nubile
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zeren Shen; Keda Shi; Yinhui Yu; Xiaoning Yu; Yuchen Lin; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Huhtala; Juhani Pietilä; Petri Mäkinen; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.