Literature DB >> 23680501

One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris.

James W Pritchett1.   

Abstract

This study assessed the results of 90 one-component revisions for failed hip resurfacing due to adverse reaction to metal wear debris (76 acetabular, 14 femoral). Patients with a femoral head size 40-45 mm (n=33) received a two-piece titanium meshed shell with a cross-linked polyethylene liner and patients with femoral head size 46-54 mm (n=43) received metal-on-metal components. Patients with femoral head size>45 mm who wished a metal-polyethylene bearing received a dual mobility femoral prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 61 months and the procedure was successful in 97% of the patients. Three failures required re-revision; there was one deep infection. There were no dislocations. One-component revision is a reasonable alternative to revision to total hip arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hip resurfacing; revision; total hip arthroplasty; wear debris

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23680501     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.

Authors:  James Min-Leong Wong; Yen-Liang Liu; Stephen Graves; Richard de Steiger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Henry Ho; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Letter to the Editor: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Adventure sports and sexual freedom hip replacement: the tripolar hip.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-28

Review 5.  Revision total hip arthroplasty for metal-on-metal failure.

Authors:  Justin S Chang; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-04

6.  Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations.

Authors:  Olli Lainiala; Aleksi Reito; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Timo Puolakka; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Salvage of a monoblock metal-on-metal cup using a dual mobility liner: a two-year MRI follow-up study.

Authors:  Maximilian F Kasparek; Lisa Renner; Martin Faschingbauer; Wenzel Waldstein; Kilian Rueckl; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jacob A Haynes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

9.  Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty with Well Fixed and Positioned Acetabular Component Using a Dual-mobility Head and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Guillem Figueras; Ramón Vives Planell; Ramón Serra Fernàndez; Joan Camí Biayna
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-10-31

10.  Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.