| Literature DB >> 23680501 |
Abstract
This study assessed the results of 90 one-component revisions for failed hip resurfacing due to adverse reaction to metal wear debris (76 acetabular, 14 femoral). Patients with a femoral head size 40-45 mm (n=33) received a two-piece titanium meshed shell with a cross-linked polyethylene liner and patients with femoral head size 46-54 mm (n=43) received metal-on-metal components. Patients with femoral head size>45 mm who wished a metal-polyethylene bearing received a dual mobility femoral prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 61 months and the procedure was successful in 97% of the patients. Three failures required re-revision; there was one deep infection. There were no dislocations. One-component revision is a reasonable alternative to revision to total hip arthroplasty.Entities:
Keywords: hip resurfacing; revision; total hip arthroplasty; wear debris
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23680501 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757