Literature DB >> 23679919

N-Aroyl indole thiobarbituric acids as inhibitors of DNA repair and replication stress response polymerases.

Grace E Coggins1, Leena Maddukuri, Narsima R Penthala, Jessica H Hartman, Sarah Eddy, Amit Ketkar, Peter A Crooks, Robert L Eoff.   

Abstract

Using a robust and quantitative assay, we have identified a novel class of DNA polymerase inhibitors that exhibits some specificity against an enzyme involved in resistance to anti-cancer drugs, namely, human DNA polymerase eta (hpol η). In our initial screen, we identified the indole thiobarbituric acid (ITBA) derivative 5-((1-(2-bromobenzoyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-2-thioxodihydropyrimidine-4,6(1H,5H)-dione (ITBA-12) as an inhibitor of the Y-family DNA member hpol η, an enzyme that has been associated with increased resistance to cisplatin and doxorubicin treatments. An additional seven DNA polymerases from different subfamilies were tested for inhibition by ITBA-12. Hpol η was the most potently inhibited enzyme (30 ± 3 μM), with hpol β, hpol γ, and hpol κ exhibiting comparable but higher IC50 values of 41 ± 24, 49 ± 6, and 59 ± 11 μM, respectively. The other polymerases tested had IC50 values closer to 80 μM. Steady-state kinetic analysis was used to investigate the mechanism of polymerase inhibition by ITBA-12. Based on changes in the Michaelis constant, it was determined that ITBA-12 acts as an allosteric (or partial) competitive inhibitor of dNTP binding. The parent ITBA scaffold was modified to produce 20 derivatives and establish structure-activity relationships by testing for inhibition of hpol η. Two compounds with N-naphthoyl Ar-substituents, ITBA-16 and ITBA-19, were both found to have improved potency against hpol η with IC50 values of 16 ± 3 μM and 17 ± 3 μM, respectively. Moreover, the specificity of ITBA-16 was improved relative to that of ITBA-12. The presence of a chloro substituent at position 5 on the indole ring appears to be crucial for effective inhibition of hpol η, with the indole N-1-naphthoyl and N-2-naphthoyl analogues being the most potent inhibitors of hpol η. These results provide a framework from which second-generation ITBA derivatives may be developed against specialized polymerases that are involved in mechanisms of radio- and chemo-resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23679919      PMCID: PMC3746001          DOI: 10.1021/cb400305r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Biol        ISSN: 1554-8929            Impact factor:   5.100


  45 in total

1.  Altered DNA polymerase iota expression in breast cancer cells leads to a reduction in DNA replication fidelity and a higher rate of mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Zhiwen Chen; Yang Liu; Robert J Hickey; Linda H Malkas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  DNA replication fidelity.

Authors:  Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  DNA adduct bypass polymerization by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4: analysis and crystal structures of multiple base pair substitution and frameshift products with the adduct 1,N2-ethenoguanine.

Authors:  Hong Zang; Angela K Goodenough; Jeong-Yun Choi; Adriana Irimia; Lioudmila V Loukachevitch; Ivan D Kozekov; Karen C Angel; Carmelo J Rizzo; Martin Egli; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Characterization of promoter regulatory elements involved in downexpression of the DNA polymerase kappa in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Lemée; C Bavoux; M J Pillaire; A Bieth; C R Machado; S D Pena; R Guimbaud; J Selves; J S Hoffmann; C Cazaux
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Induction of MGMT expression is associated with temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenografts.

Authors:  Gaspar J Kitange; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Patrick T Grogan; Jeff D Lamont; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  DNA damage tolerance: when it's OK to make mistakes.

Authors:  Debbie J Chang; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  The Werner's Syndrome protein collaborates with REV1 to promote replication fork progression on damaged DNA.

Authors:  Lara G Phillips; Julian E Sale
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-08-05

8.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor MK886 impedes DNA polymerase activity.

Authors:  Amit Ketkar; Maroof K Zafar; Leena Maddukuri; Kinrin Yamanaka; Surajit Banerjee; Martin Egli; Jeong-Yun Choi; R Stephen Lloyd; Robert L Eoff
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Translesion DNA polymerases and cancer.

Authors:  Nick M Makridakis; Juergen K V Reichardt
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  10 in total

1.  N-Naphthoyl-substituted indole thio-barbituric acid analogs inhibit the helicase activity of the hepatitis C virus NS3.

Authors:  John C Marecki; Suja Aarattuthodiyil; Alicia K Byrd; Narsimha R Penthala; Peter A Crooks; Kevin D Raney
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Translesion DNA Synthesis in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Maroof K Zafar; Robert L Eoff
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Synthesis and evaluation of a series of resveratrol analogues as potent anti-cancer agents that target tubulin.

Authors:  Nikhil R Madadi; Hongliang Zong; Amit Ketkar; Chen Zheng; Narsimha R Penthala; Venumadhav Janganati; Shobanbabu Bommagani; Robert L Eoff; Monica L Guzman; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.597

4.  Synthesis and anti-proliferative activity of aromatic substituted 5-((1-benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-1,3-dimethylpyrimidine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione analogs against human tumor cell lines.

Authors:  Nikhil Reddy Madadi; Narsimha Reddy Penthala; Venumadhav Janganati; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  Fluorescent Probes of DNA Repair.

Authors:  David L Wilson; Eric T Kool
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  A Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Human DNA Polymerase η Potentiates the Effects of Cisplatin in Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Maroof K Zafar; Leena Maddukuri; Amit Ketkar; Narsimha R Penthala; Megan R Reed; Sarah Eddy; Peter A Crooks; Robert L Eoff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  A Facile Semisynthesis and Evaluation of Garcinoic Acid and Its Analogs for the Inhibition of Human DNA Polymerase β.

Authors:  Satheesh Gujarathi; Maroof Khan Zafar; Xingui Liu; Robert L Eoff; Guangrong Zheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Early Drug Discovery and Development of Novel Cancer Therapeutics Targeting DNA Polymerase Eta (POLH).

Authors:  David M Wilson; Matthew A J Duncton; Caleb Chang; Christie Lee Luo; Taxiarchis M Georgiadis; Patricia Pellicena; Ashley M Deacon; Yang Gao; Debanu Das
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 9.  DNA Damage Tolerance Pathways in Human Cells: A Potential Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Ashlynn Ai Li Ler; Michael P Carty
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Translesion synthesis inhibitors as a new class of cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Seema M Patel; Radha Charan Dash; M Kyle Hadden
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.206

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.