Literature DB >> 23677918

Accuracy of Doppler-echocardiographic parameters for the detection of aortic bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction.

Othman Smadi1, Julio Garcia, Philippe Pibarot, Emmanuel Gaillard, Ibrahim Hassan, Lyes Kadem.   

Abstract

AIMS: In vitro and in vivo studies were performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different Doppler-echocardiographic parameters proposed in the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines to identify dysfunction of bileaflet mechanical valves (BMV) in the aortic position. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Two models of BMV (St Jude HP, MCRI On-X) of different sizes (21;23;25;27 mm) were tested in vitro under a wide range of cardiac outputs (3-7 L/min). The motion of one or both leaflets was restricted to induce a mild (25% restriction in total valve orifice area) and moderate-to-severe (50% restriction in total valve area). Doppler-echocardiographic parameters of valve function were also measured in 17 patients with BMV of whom 4 had valve dysfunction confirmed by cinefluoroscopy. The specificity of all the parameters was high (in vitro: 83-100%; in vivo: 69-100%), but the sensitivity was low (range: 0-83% and 25-100%, respectively). A higher cut-off value for the ratio of peak left ventricular outflow tract velocity to peak aortic velocity or Doppler velocity index (DVI) (<0.35 instead of 0.3 or 0.25) improved the sensitivity (>90%) for the detection of moderate-to-severe dysfunction but remained low for mild dysfunction (50%). Furthermore, a difference of normal reference effective orifice area (EOA) minus measured EOA (EOA-D) >1 standard deviation identified mild and moderate-to-severe dysfunction with sensitivity of 61 and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The Doppler-echocardiographic parameters and criteria proposed in the guidelines lack sensitivity for the detection of BMV dysfunction. The utilization of a DVI < 0.35 or an EOA-D > 1 SD improved the sensitivity (>90%) for the detection of moderate-to-severe dysfunction, but the sensitivity remained suboptimal (<65%) for detection of mild dysfunction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Doppler echocardiography; Prosthetic heart valve

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23677918     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  5 in total

1.  The significance of the analysis on scalographic pattern for detecting malfunctioning bileaflet valve with the wavelet analysis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sugiki; Kenji Sugiki; Tomonori Ooka; Satoru Wakasa; Yasushige Shingu; Tsuyoshi Tachibana; Yoshiro Matsui
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot; Jean-Gaston Dumesnil
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit.

Authors:  Eric J Keller; S Chris Malaisrie; Jane Kruse; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-30

4.  A reoperation of thrombosed On-X valve detected by multidetector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  Hideki Teshima; Masahiko Ikebuchi; Toshikazu Sano; Yusuke Kinugasa; Ryuta Tai; Hiroyuki Irie
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Dysfunction and the Non-Newtonian Blood Model Approach.

Authors:  Aolin Chen; Adi Azriff Bin Basri; Norzian Bin Ismail; Masaaki Tamagawa; Di Zhu; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.664

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.