Literature DB >> 23671381

Using a limited number of dermatomes as a predictor of the 56-dermatome test of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury in the pediatric population.

Laura Krisa1, M J Mulcahey, John P Gaughan, Brian Smith, Lawrence C Vogel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For young children with spinal cord injury (SCI), the sensory exam of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is long and arduous, often making it impossible to complete.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we determine whether an abbreviated sensory exam provides comparable information to the full 56-dermatome exam.
METHOD: A total of 726 56-dermatome sensory exams were completed with 190 children and youth with SCI ranging in age from 3 to 21 years. The cohort was randomly split into test and validation groups. For the test group, a principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out separately for pin prick (PP) and light touch (LT) scores. From the PCA, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify the most influential set of 4, 8, 12, and 16 dermatomes. From the sensory exam data obtained from the validation group, a linear regression was performed to compare the limited-dermatome composite scores to the total 56-dermatome scores.
RESULTS: For both LT and PP, the 16-dermatome test resulted in the best fit (0.86 and 0.87, respectively) with the 56-dermatome test and was comprised of dermatomes from both the left (7 dermatomes) and right (9 dermatomes) sides and at least 1 dermatome from each vertebral region bilaterally (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral).
CONCLUSION: A 16-dermatome sensory exam provided a good correlation to the 56-dermatome exam. The shortened exam may be useful for evaluating children with SCI who cannot tolerate the full examination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neurologic evaluation; pediatrics; spinal cord injury

Year:  2013        PMID: 23671381      PMCID: PMC3641913          DOI: 10.1310/sci1902-114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil        ISSN: 1082-0744


  10 in total

1.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ralph J Marino; Tarcisio Barros; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stephen P Burns; William H Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Michael Haak; Lesley M Hudson; Michael M Priebe
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Rater agreement on the ISCSCI motor and sensory scores obtained before and after formal training in testing technique.

Authors:  Mary Jane Mulcahey; John Gaughan; Randal R Betz; Lawrence C Vogel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: reliability of data when applied to children and youths.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; J Gaughan; R R Betz; K J Johansen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Computerized classification of neurologic injury based on the international standards for classification of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ross S Chafetz; Seyla Prak; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Michael J DeVivo; Lawrence C Vogel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Inter-rater reliability of the 1992 international standards for neurological and functional classification of incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M Jonsson; A Tollbäck; H Gonzales; J Borg
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association standards.

Authors:  G Savic; E M K Bergström; H L Frankel; M A Jamous; P W Jones
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  A test of the 1992 International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  M E Cohen; J F Ditunno; W H Donovan; F M Maynard
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: training effect on accurate classification.

Authors:  Ross S Chafetz; Lawrence C Vogel; Randal R Betz; John P Gaughan; Mary Jane Mulcahey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Agreement of repeated motor and sensory scores at individual myotomes and dermatomes in young persons with complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; J Gaughan; R R Betz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.772

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Pediatric Spina Bifida and Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Joslyn Gober; Sruthi P Thomas; David R Gater
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.