Literature DB >> 17016490

The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: reliability of data when applied to children and youths.

M J Mulcahey1, J Gaughan, R R Betz, K J Johansen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Intra-rater reliability study, cross-sectional design.
OBJECTIVES: To determine reliability of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI) motor and sensory exam in children.
SETTING: Nonprofit pediatric hospital.
METHODS: In all, 74 subjects had two trials of the motor and sensory exams. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated for total motor (TM), pin prick (PP) and light touch (LT) scores for the entire sample, four age groups, severity and type of injury. Coefficients >0.90=high reliability; 0.75-0.90=moderate reliability and <0.75=inadequate reliability.
RESULTS: Children <four years (N=7) were unable to participate in the exams. TM ICC, CI=0.888, 0.821-0.93 (N=73); PP ICC, CI=0.975, 0.96-0.98 (N=67) and LT ICC, CI=0.974, 0.974-0.985 (N=68). When age was considered, 4-5 year: TM ICC, CI=0.917, 0.69-0.98 (N=11), PP=0.912, 0.49-0.985 (N=7), LT=0.948, 0.63-0.993 (N=6); for 6-11 year: TM ICC, CI=0.711, 0.226-0.892 (N=18), PP=0.952, 0.867-0.983 (M=17), LT=0.952, 0.867-0.983 (N=17); for 12-15 year: TM ICC, CI=0.893, 0.723-0.959 (N=19), PP=0.982, 0.953-0.993 (N=19), LT=0.982, 0.953-0.993 (N=19); for 16-21 year: TM ICC, CI=0.912, 0.80-0.961 (N=25), PP=0.98, 0.954-0.991 (N=25), LT=0.98, 0.954-0.991 (N=25). ICC for severity and type of injury >0.90 except for TM in complete injuries (0.808).
CONCLUSION: The ISCSCI exams may have poor utility in children under 4 years. While reliability values for the motor and sensory exams met or exceeded recommended values, wide CI suggest poor precision of the motor exam in children under 15 years of age and sensory exams in children under 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016490     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  35 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal pediatric spinal cord using an inner field of view echo-planar imaging sequence.

Authors:  N Barakat; F B Mohamed; L N Hunter; P Shah; S H Faro; A F Samdani; J Finsterbusch; R Betz; J Gaughan; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Imaging of spinal injury in abusive head trauma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Arabinda K Choudhary; Ramsay Ishak; Thomas T Zacharia; Mark S Dias
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  Rater agreement on the ISCSCI motor and sensory scores obtained before and after formal training in testing technique.

Authors:  Mary Jane Mulcahey; John Gaughan; Randal R Betz; Lawrence C Vogel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Pediatric intramedullary spinal cord tumor outcomes using the WeeFIM scale.

Authors:  Thomas Noh; Manuel S Vogt; David W Pruitt; Trent R Hummel; Francesco T Mangano
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Ongoing walking recovery 2 years after locomotor training in a child with severe incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Emily J Fox; Nicole J Tester; Chetan P Phadke; Preeti M Nair; Claudia R Senesac; Dena R Howland; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-03-18

6.  The international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: intra-rater agreement of total motor and sensory scores in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Ross S Chafetz; John P Gaughan; Lawrence C Vogel; Randal Betz; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Ambulation in children and youth with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Lawrence C Vogel; Melissa M Mendoza; Jennifer C Schottler; Kathleen M Chlan; Caroline J Anderson
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: classification skills of clinicians versus computational algorithms.

Authors:  C Schuld; S Franz; H J A van Hedel; J Moosburger; D Maier; R Abel; H van de Meent; A Curt; N Weidner; R Rupp
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Psychosocial outcomes among youth with spinal cord injury and their primary caregivers.

Authors:  Erin H Kelly; Mary Jane Mulcahey; Sara J Klaas; Heather F Russell; Caroline J Anderson; Lawrence C Vogel
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Imaging techniques in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Noriko Salamon; Langston T Holly
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.