Literature DB >> 23670588

Modifying clinicians use of PACS imaging.

Madusha Chandratilleke1, Stepfen Honeybul.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether it would be possible to minimise the delay that occurs between the time a radiological image becomes available for viewing on PACS and the time that it is actually seen by the requesting physician. The study was conducted at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital in Perth Western Australia. Participants in the study were all junior doctors. The first part of the study measured the current time delay between images being available on PACS and actually being viewed. In the second part of the study, the doctors were notified by a paging system when the images were available. The reduction in time delay was then compared. Following pager notification, the mean average time delay reduced from a mean of 180.02 min (95 % confidence interval (CI), 135.1 to 225 min) to a mean of 33.94 min (95 % CI, 24.1 to 43.8 min; P < 0.0001). The study has demonstrated that it is possible to modify clinicians' usage of PACS; however, there remain questions regarding the sustainability of such an intervention and the impact that this may have on overall patient outcome. There may be potential for integration of the rapidly expanding technologies such as tablets, iPads and iPhones in order to automate this type of notification and this may be a focus of future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670588      PMCID: PMC3824928          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9608-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  26 in total

1.  Picture archiving and communication systems: the users' view.

Authors:  J R Pilling
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Aligning business and information technology domains: strategic planning in hospitals.

Authors:  J C Henderson; J B Thomas
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1992

3.  PACS direct experiences: implementation, selection, benefits realized.

Authors:  Karen Ondo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A balanced evaluation perspective: picture archiving and communication system impacts on hospital workflow.

Authors:  Rogier van de Wetering; Ronald Batenburg; Johan Versendaal; Reeva Lederman; Lucy Firth
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Saving time, improving satisfaction: the impact of a digital radiology system on physician workflow and system efficiency.

Authors:  Malathi Srinivasan; Eric Liederman; Noralyn Baluyot; Robert Jacoby
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2006

6.  Work flow redesign: the key to success when using PACS. 2002.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel; Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  H L Kundel; S B Seshadri; C P Langlotz; P N Lanken; S C Horii; C F Nodine; M Polansky; E Feingold; I Brikman; M Bozzo; R Redfern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  D N De Simone; H L Kundel; R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; I S Brikman; S S Khalsa; M J Davey; N E Brisbon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Time comparison of intensive care units with and without digital viewing systems.

Authors:  L M Humphrey; K Fitzpatrick; N Atallah; C E Ravin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images.

Authors:  R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; H L Kundel; D DeSimone; F Van der Voorde; W B Gefter; D M Epstein; W T Miller; J M Aronchick; M B Simson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.