Literature DB >> 16763932

A balanced evaluation perspective: picture archiving and communication system impacts on hospital workflow.

Rogier van de Wetering1, Ronald Batenburg, Johan Versendaal, Reeva Lederman, Lucy Firth.   

Abstract

Around the world, hospitals are faced with both budget and regulatory pressures, forcing them to re-examine the way clinical practice is carried out. Proposed technologies that provide workflow enhancements include Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS); however, is PACS really effective in improving hospital workflow and the flow onto patient care, and how should this be evaluated? An acknowledged and successful approach for organizational evaluation is the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), providing the fundamental features for assessing organizations from various perspectives. In this research, the impact of PACS on the workflow of a large public hospital in Melbourne, Australia, is examined using an adapted version of the BSC. Empirically, this model was applied as an evaluation instrument through a series of in-depth interviews with PACS users. Results show that PACS did improve hospital workflow considerably and that the organizational alignment of PACS in hospitals is an important critical success factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763932      PMCID: PMC3045172          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0628-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Workflow in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  G D Laet; J Naudts; J Vandevivere
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital.

Authors:  J Watkins
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  The balanced scorecard in healthcare organizations: a performance measurement and strategic planning methodology.

Authors:  K E Voelker; J S Rakich; G R French
Journal:  Hosp Top       Date:  2001

4.  Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel; Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Trends in PACS image storage and archive.

Authors:  B J Liu; F Cao; M Z Zhou; G Mogel; L Documet
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 6.  Enterprise PACS and image distribution.

Authors:  H K Huang
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations.

Authors:  Noorein Inamdar; Robert S Kaplan; Marvin Bower
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2002 May-Jun

Review 8.  Formulating hospital strategy: moving beyond a market mentality.

Authors:  J M Liedtka
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1992

9.  The effect of PACS on the time required for technologists to produce radiographic images in the emergency department radiology suite.

Authors:  R O Redfern; C P Langlotz; S B Abbuhl; M Polansky; S C Horii; H L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  The impact of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) upon an intensive care unit.

Authors:  J Watkins; G Weatherburn; S Bryan
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  16 in total

1.  Empirical investigation of radiologists' priorities for PACS selection: an analytical hierarchy process approach.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson; Vamsi R Narra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Picture, archiving and communication system in the Italian NHS: a primer on diffusion and evaluation analysis.

Authors:  Luca Buccoliero; Stefano Calciolari; Marta Marsilio; Elisa Mattavelli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Monitoring the PACS implementation process in a large university hospital--discrepancies between radiologists and physicians.

Authors:  Philippe Duyck; Bram Pynoo; Pieter Devolder; Tony Voet; Luc Adang; Dries Ovaere; Jan Vercruysse
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Virtual organization of hospital medical imaging: a user satisfaction survey.

Authors:  Claude Sicotte; Guy Paré; Kobena Kra Bini; Marie-Pierre Moreault; Guy Laverdure
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Towards a theory of PACS deployment: an integrative PACS maturity framework.

Authors:  Rogier van de Wetering; Ronald Batenburg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Modifying clinicians use of PACS imaging.

Authors:  Madusha Chandratilleke; Stepfen Honeybul
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The Impact of a Health IT Changeover on Medical Imaging Department Work Processes and Turnaround Times: A mixed method study.

Authors:  A Georgiou; M Prgomet; S Lymer; A Hordern; L Ridley; J Westbrook
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in a Saudi Arabian hospital radiology department.

Authors:  Bakheet Aldosari
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Isla M Hains; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray; Joanne Burns; Carl May; Tracy Finch; Catherine O'Donnell; Paul Wallace; Frances Mair
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.