Literature DB >> 8439581

Time comparison of intensive care units with and without digital viewing systems.

L M Humphrey1, K Fitzpatrick, N Atallah, C E Ravin.   

Abstract

As hospital radiology departments and intensive care units (ICUs) make plans to use or expand the usage of digital data outside of the radiology department, the need to assess the requirements of the potential recipients in the ICUs has become more important. The present operations in an ICU that uses digital viewing instead of film has been compared with a unit that does not. The difference in time between x-ray exposure and final image viewing was determined in both settings and compared. In this preliminary study, significant differences were found between the two units. The odds of having examination results actually accessed by the ordering physician in an hour or less were 9.5 times greater for the unit with digital viewing capability than for the one without it.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8439581     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Initial experience with automatic image transmission to an intensive care unit using Picture Archiving and Communications System technology.

Authors:  C E Ravin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Electronic imaging in a teaching hospital intensive care unit: evaluation of the clinical review system.

Authors:  T Gillespy; E V Staab; E Lawrence
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study.

Authors:  E A Franken; W L Smith; K S Berbaum; S C Kao; Y Sato
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

4.  Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  D N De Simone; H L Kundel; R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; I S Brikman; S S Khalsa; M J Davey; N E Brisbon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Initial experience with a radiology imaging network to newborn and intensive care units.

Authors:  R M Witt; M D Cohen; C R Appledorn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images.

Authors:  R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; H L Kundel; D DeSimone; F Van der Voorde; W B Gefter; D M Epstein; W T Miller; J M Aronchick; M B Simson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.959

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Impact of a diagnostic workstation on workflow in the emergency department at a level I trauma center.

Authors:  D S Hirschorn; C R Hinrichs; D M Gor; K Shah; G Visvikis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A General Framework for Monitoring Image Acquisition Workflow in the Radiology Environment: Timeliness for Acute Stroke CT Imaging.

Authors:  Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Christina L Brunnquell; Gregory D Avey; Carrie Bartels; Daryn S Belden; Richard J Bruce; Aaron S Field; Walter W Peppler; Peter Wasmund; Gary Wendt
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Combining fast response and low cost in an intensive care unit viewing station.

Authors:  E Bellon; W Houtput; B Bijnens; P Suetens; G Marchal; P Lauwers
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Modifying clinicians use of PACS imaging.

Authors:  Madusha Chandratilleke; Stepfen Honeybul
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Isla M Hains; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.