Literature DB >> 23669588

Determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived measurements.

Sabrina Doblas1, Mathilde Wagner, Helena S Leitao, Jean-Luc Daire, Ralph Sinkus, Valérie Vilgrain, Bernard E Van Beers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) determined with 3 b values and the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters in the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with 86 solid hepatic lesions, including 8 hemangiomas, 20 lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia, 9 adenomas, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas, 13 metastases, and 6 cholangiocarcinomas, were assessed in this prospective study. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 11 b values to measure the ADCs (with b = 0, 150, and 500 s/mm) and the IVIM-derived parameters, namely, the pure diffusion coefficient and the perfusion-related diffusion fraction and coefficient. The diffusion parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors and between tumor types, and their diagnostic value in identifying tumor malignancy was assessed.
RESULTS: The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients were significantly higher in benign than in malignant tumors (benign: 2.32 [0.87] × 10 mm/s and 1.42 [0.37] × 10 mm/s vs malignant: 1.64 [0.51] × 10 mm/s and 1.14 [0.28] × 10 mm/s, respectively; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005), whereas the perfusion-related diffusion parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients provided similar accuracy in assessing tumor malignancy (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.770 and 0.723, respectively). In the multigroup analysis, the ADC was found to be significantly higher in hemangiomas than in hepatocellular carcinomas, metastases, and cholangiocarcinomas. In the same manner, it was higher in lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia than in metastases and cholangiocarcinomas. However, the pure diffusion coefficient was significantly higher only in hemangiomas versus hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the ADC, the diffusion parameters derived from the IVIM model did not improve the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669588     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182915912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hennedige; James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan; Fiona P Leung; Lynette Li San Teo; Sridhar Iyer; Gang Wang; Stephen Chang; Krishna Kumar Madhavan; Aileen Wee; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Use of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessment of treatment response to invasive fungal infection in the lung.

Authors:  Chenggong Yan; Jun Xu; Wei Xiong; Qi Wei; Ru Feng; Yuankui Wu; Qifa Liu; Caixia Li; Queenie Chan; Yikai Xu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Intravoxel incoherent motion: application in differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Ling Zhang; Xin Hua Jiang; Wei Dong Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Accurate IVIM model-based liver lesion characterisation can be achieved with only three b-value DWI.

Authors:  P Mürtz; A M Sprinkart; M Reick; C C Pieper; A-H Schievelkamp; R König; H H Schild; W A Willinek; G M Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiation between hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Authors:  Naim Jerjir; Luk Bruyneel; Marc Haspeslagh; Sarah Quenet; Kenneth Coenegrachts
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Can diffusion-weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant pediatric liver tumors?

Authors:  Pablo Caro-Domínguez; Abha A Gupta; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 7.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of abdominal organs: computation of reference parameters in a large cohort of C57Bl/6 mice and correlation to microvessel density.

Authors:  Christian Eberhardt; Moritz C Wurnig; Andrea Wirsching; Cristina Rossi; Markus Rottmar; Pinar S Özbay; Lukas Filli; Mickael Lesurtel; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lung lesions: repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement.

Authors:  L Bernardin; N H M Douglas; D J Collins; S L Giles; E A M O'Flynn; M Orton; N M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of breast cancer xenograft models: texture analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Bo La Yun; Nariya Cho; Mulan Li; Min Hye Jang; So Yeon Park; Ho Chul Kang; Bohyoung Kim; In Chan Song; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.