Naim Jerjir1, Luk Bruyneel2, Marc Haspeslagh3, Sarah Quenet4, Kenneth Coenegrachts1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, AZ St.-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Bruges, Belgium. 2. 2 Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3. 3 Hospital Administration and Statistics, AZ St.-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Bruges, Belgium. 4. 4 Olea Medical, La Ciotat, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine if intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) can be used as new and supplemental MRI techniques to differentiate hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) from focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) and analyse if diffusion parameter apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameter true diffusion coefficient (D) differ in doing so. METHODS: This prospective study included 21 patients (8 HCAs and 13 FNHs) who underwent a specifically designed MRI scanning protocol, including series for analysis of IVIM (four b-values 0, 10, 150 and 800 s mm-2) and DCE-MRI. On a dedicated workstation, identical regions of interest were placed in parametric maps of Ktrans, Ve, D and ADC in each lesion for quantification. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were classified in different types. RESULTS: HCAs had significantly lower values for Ktrans (mean 1.45 vs 2.68 min-1; p = 0.029) and D (mean 1.02 × 10-3 vs 1.22 × 10-3 mm2 s-1; p = 0.033). Both parameters showed good diagnostic accuracy of 76%. TIC analysis could not differentiate between HCAs and FNHs. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, Ktrans and D were able to differentiate HCAs from FNHs in most cases, whereas Ve, ADC and TIC analysis were not. Advances in knowledge: Histological differences between HCAs and FNHs can be quantified on MRI using Ktrans and D.
OBJECTIVE: To examine if intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) can be used as new and supplemental MRI techniques to differentiate hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) from focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) and analyse if diffusion parameter apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameter true diffusion coefficient (D) differ in doing so. METHODS: This prospective study included 21 patients (8 HCAs and 13 FNHs) who underwent a specifically designed MRI scanning protocol, including series for analysis of IVIM (four b-values 0, 10, 150 and 800 s mm-2) and DCE-MRI. On a dedicated workstation, identical regions of interest were placed in parametric maps of Ktrans, Ve, D and ADC in each lesion for quantification. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were classified in different types. RESULTS: HCAs had significantly lower values for Ktrans (mean 1.45 vs 2.68 min-1; p = 0.029) and D (mean 1.02 × 10-3 vs 1.22 × 10-3 mm2 s-1; p = 0.033). Both parameters showed good diagnostic accuracy of 76%. TIC analysis could not differentiate between HCAs and FNHs. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, Ktrans and D were able to differentiate HCAs from FNHs in most cases, whereas Ve, ADC and TIC analysis were not. Advances in knowledge: Histological differences between HCAs and FNHs can be quantified on MRI using Ktrans and D.
Authors: Shahid M Hussain; Türkan Terkivatan; Pieter E Zondervan; Esmée Lanjouw; Sjoerd de Rave; Jan N M Ijzermans; Rob A de Man Journal: Radiographics Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Matthanja Bieze; Jacomina W van den Esschert; C Yung Nio; Joanne Verheij; Johannes B Reitsma; Valeska Terpstra; Thomas M van Gulik; Saffire S K S Phoa Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: M O Leach; K M Brindle; J L Evelhoch; J R Griffiths; M R Horsman; A Jackson; G C Jayson; I R Judson; M V Knopp; R J Maxwell; D McIntyre; A R Padhani; P Price; R Rathbone; G J Rustin; P S Tofts; G M Tozer; W Vennart; J C Waterton; S R Williams; P Workman Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-05-09 Impact factor: 7.640